Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 857

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeted disruption of the Chop gene delays endoplasmic reticulum stress–mediated diabetes

Open access
Seiichi Oyadomari, Akio Koizumi, Kiyoshi Takeda, Tomomi Gotoh, Shizuo Akira, Eiichi Araki, Masataka Mori·2002·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Overload of pancreatic beta cells in conditions such as hyperglycemia, obesity, and long-term treatment with sulfonylureas leads to beta cell exhaustion and type 2 diabetes. Because beta cell mass declines under these conditions, apparently as a result of apoptosis, we speculated that overload kills beta cells as a result of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. The Akita mouse, which carries a conformation-altering missense mutation (Cys96Tyr) in Insulin 2, likewise exhibits hyperglycemia and a reduced beta cell mass. In the development of diabetes in Akita mice, mRNAs for the ER chaperone Bip and the ER stress-associated apoptosis factor Chop were induced in the pancreas. Overexpression of the mutant insulin in mouse MIN6 beta cells induced Chop expression and led to apoptosis. Targeted disruption of the Chop gene delayed the onset of diabetes in heterozygous Akita mice by 8-10 weeks. We conclude that ER overload in beta cells causes ER stress and leads to apoptosis via Chop induction. Our findings suggest a new therapeutic approach for preventing the onset of diabetes by inhibiting Chop induction or by increasing chaperone capacity in the ER.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1172/jci14550

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.2337/diabetes.31.8.694 · DOI
  2. Rahier, 1983, Diabetologia, 24, 366, 10.1007/BF00251826 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1101/gad.13.10.1211 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80855-7 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80835-1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1101/gad.8.4.453 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/0014-5793(96)01016-2 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/47513 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00264-7 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00265-9 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1073/pnas.191207498 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1172/JCI1842 · DOI
  13. 10.2337/diabetes.46.5.887 · DOI
  14. 10.1172/JCI4431 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1006/niox.2001.0344 · DOI
  16. 10.2337/diabetes.44.1.104 · DOI
  17. 10.1073/pnas.220425597 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Batchvarova, 1995, EMBO J, 14, 4654, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00147.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81881-4 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.2337/diabetes.50.2007.S150 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/107710497174778 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00108-8 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1126/science.287.5453.664 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 857

Metadata

Authors
Oyadomari, S., Koizumi, A., Takeda, K., Gotoh, T., Akira, S., Araki, E., & Mori, M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2002-02-15
Volume
109
Issue
4
Pages
525-532
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058511356
Cited by
857
References
2
FWCI
10.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeted disruption of the Chop gene delays endoplasmic reticulum stress–mediated diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci14550
The paper
Oyadomari, S., Koizumi, A., Takeda, K., Gotoh, T., Akira, S., Araki, E., & Mori, M. (2002). Targeted disruption of the Chop gene delays endoplasmic reticulum stress–mediated diabetes. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci14550

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.