Cited by 223Treatment of Major DepressionMental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Can Phase III Trial Results of Antidepressant Medications Be Generalized to Clinical Practice? A STAR*D Report

Wisniewski, Stephen R., Rush, A. John, Nierenberg, Andrew A., Gaynes, Bradley N., Warden, Diane, Luther, James F., McGrath, Patrick J., Lavori, Philip W. +3 more·2009·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Phase III clinical trials for depression enroll participants with major depressive disorder according to stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. These patients may not be representative of typical depressed patients seeking treatment. This analysis used data from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) project--which used broad inclusion and minimal exclusion criteria--to evaluate whether phase III clinical trials recruit representative depressed outpatients. METHOD: Of 2,855 participants, 22.2% met typical entry criteria for phase III clinical trials (efficacy sample) and 77.8% did not (nonefficacy sample). These groups were compared regarding baseline sociodemographic and clinical features and the characteristics and outcomes of acute-phase treatment. RESULTS: The efficacy sample had a shorter average duration of illness and lower rates of family history of substance abuse, prior suicide attempts, and anxious and atypical symptom features. Despite similar medication dosing and time at exit dose, the efficacy participants tolerated citalopram better. They also had higher rates of response (51.6% versus 39.1%) and remission (34.4% versus 24.7%). These differences persisted even after adjustments for baseline differences. CONCLUSIONS: Phase III trials do not recruit representative treatment-seeking depressed patients. Broader phase III inclusion criteria would increase the generalizability of results to practice, potentially reducing placebo response and remission rates (reducing the risk of failed trials) but at the risk of some increase in adverse events.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08071027

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the STAR*D trial, 77.8% of the patients would have been excluded in conventional clinical trials.

    “Results from a large trial conducted in a clinical setting (the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial) showed that 77.8% of the patients in the STAR*D trial would have been excluded in conventional clinical trials.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wisniewski, S. R., Rush, A. J., Nierenberg, A. A., Gaynes, B. N., Warden, D., Luther, J. F., McGrath, P. J., Lavori, P. W., Thase, M. E., Fava, M., & Trivedi, M. H.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2009-05
Volume
166
Issue
5
Pages
599-607
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2124136543
Cited by
223
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 27
FWCI
17.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01mh90003-26-0-0)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (N01‐MH‐90003)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
major depressive disorder, antidepressants, citalopram, STAR*D, trial representativeness, placebo response, remission, response rate, outpatients
MeSH terms
Adult, Demography, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Surveys and Questionnaires, Remission Induction, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Citalopram, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review