Cited by 86Treatment of Major DepressionDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Treatment Course With Antidepressant Therapy in Late-Life Depression

Open access
Sheline, Yvette I., Disabato, Brianne M., Hranilovich, Jennifer, Morris, Carrie, D’Angelo, Gina, Pieper, Carl, Toffanin, Tommaso, Taylor, Warren D. +7 more·2012·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In order to assess the effect of gray matter volumes and cortical thickness on antidepressant treatment response in late-life depression, the authors examined the relationship between brain regions identified a priori and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores over the course of an antidepressant treatment trial. METHOD: In a nonrandomized prospective trial, 168 patients who were at least 60 years of age and met DSM-IV criteria for major depression underwent MRI and were enrolled in a 12-week treatment study. Exclusion criteria included cognitive impairment or severe medical disorders. The volumes or cortical thicknesses of regions of interest that differed between the depressed group and a comparison group (N=50) were determined. These regions of interest were used in analyses of the depressed group to predict antidepressant treatment outcome. Mixed-model analyses adjusting for age, education, age at depression onset, race, baseline MADRS score, scanner, and interaction with time examined predictors of MADRS scores over time. RESULTS: Smaller hippocampal volumes predicted a slower response to treatment. With the inclusion of white matter hyper-intensity severity and neuropsychological factor scores, the best model included hippocampal volume and cognitive processing speed to predict rate of response over time. A secondary analysis showed that hippocampal volume and frontal pole thickness differed between patients who achieved remission and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: These data expand our understanding of the prediction of treatment course in late-life depression. The authors propose that the primary variables of hippocampal volume and cognitive processing speed, subsuming other contributing variables (episodic memory, executive function, language processing) predict antidepressant response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12010122

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In depression of older adults, treatment with a combination of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, especially learning-based forms such as cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT), has been shown to be effective.

    “In depression of older adults, treatment with a combination of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, especially learning‐based forms such as cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT), has been shown to be effective5, 6.”
  • Combined treatment (antidepressant medication plus depression-specific psychotherapy) may be more effective than either alone in some populations, but side effect risks and patient demands/burdens may be greater.

    “Combined treatment (antidepressant medication plus depression‐specific psychotherapy) may be more effective than either alone in some populations, but side effect risks and patient demands/burdens may be greater5, 6, 195, 217.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheline, Y. I., Disabato, B. M., Hranilovich, J., Morris, C., D’Angelo, G., Pieper, C., Toffanin, T., Taylor, W. D., MacFall, J. R., Wilkins, C., Barch, D. M., Welsh-Bohmer, K. A., Steffens, D. C., Krishnan, R. R., & Doraiswamy, P. M.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2012-11
Volume
169
Issue
11
Pages
1185-1193
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2121579891
Cited by
86
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K24 MH79510-09, R01 MH62158, R01-MH60697, R01MH074916, R01MH060697, K24MH079510, R01MH062158)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR.00036, M01RR000036)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
geriatric depression, antidepressant response, hippocampal volume, cortical thickness, white matter hyperintensities, processing speed, treatment response prediction, remission, gray matter volume
MeSH terms
Aged, Amygdala, Antidepressive Agents, Brain, Caudate Nucleus, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Frontal Lobe, Hippocampus, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Organ Size, Personality Inventory, Prospective Studies, Psychometrics, Reaction Time, Treatment Outcome, Sertraline, Parahippocampal Gyrus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review