Cited by 67Treatment of Major DepressionStress Responses and CortisolNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Prefrontal cortical GABA abnormalities are associated with reduced hippocampal volume in major depressive disorder

Open access
Abdallah, Chadi G., Jackowski, Andrea, Sato, João R., Mao, Xiangling, Kang, Guoxin, Cheema, Raminder, Coplan, Jeremy D., Mathew, Sanjay J. +1 more·2015·European Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Hippocampal volume reduction has been related to treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and is hypothesized to reflect impaired amino-acid neurotransmission. To better understand the role of amino acid neurotransmission in hippocampal volume deficits, and subsequent resistance to treatment, this study investigated the relationship between hippocampal volumes and GABA levels in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), previously associated with TRD. Thirty-three medication-free major depressive disorder (MDD; 14 TRD and 19 non-TRD) and 26 healthy controls (HC) subjects were studied. Participants underwent high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to estimate hippocampal volume and proton MR spectroscopy ((1)H MRS) to measure ACC GABA levels. MDD patients, with known ACC GABA levels, were divided into two groups: MDD Low GABA and MDD High GABA. We found a significant reduction in hippocampal volume in the MDD Low GABA group compared to MDD High GABA (p<0.001) and HC (p=0.01). The relationship between hippocampal volume and cortical GABA was population (i.e. MDD group) and region specific (i.e. prefrontal cortex). Comparing TRD, non-TRD and HC groups, there was a main effect of group on hippocampal volume (p=0.04), which post hoc analysis revealed as smaller hippocampal volume in TRD subjects than in non-TRD (p=0.05) and HC groups (p=0.03). No hippocampal volume differences between non-TRD and HC groups. The data provides insight into the role of prefrontal neurochemical deficits in the limbic structural abnormalities observed in MDD. In addition, it replicates the relationship between TRD and smaller hippocampal volumes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.04.025

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First M Spitzer R Gibbon M Williams J 1995 Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders: Patient Edition (SCIDI/P. Version 2.0 Biometric Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdallah, C. G., Jackowski, A., Sato, J. R., Mao, X., Kang, G., Cheema, R., Coplan, J. D., Mathew, S. J., & Shungu, D. C.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do ABC (BR)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US)
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Abdallah, Chadi G.
Venue
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
1082-1090
ISSN
0924-977X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1560836719
Cited by
67
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01-MH07895 (DCS), K23-MH-069656, MO1-RR-00071 (SJM))
  • CFIDS Association of America, Inc (DCS)
  • Weill Cornell Medical College New Faculty Development Funds (DCS)
  • NIDA (T32 DA022975)
  • Clinical Neurosciences Division of the VA National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation (NARSAD New Investigator Award—Vital Projects Fund Inc. Investigator) (NIMH K23 MH-101498 (CGA))
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
major depressive disorder, treatment-resistant depression, hippocampal volume, GABA, anterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, amino acid neurotransmission, 1H NMR
MeSH terms
Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Gyrus Cinguli, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Organ Size, Prefrontal Cortex, Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review