Cited by 177Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Early smoking onset and risk for subsequent nicotine dependence: a monozygotic co-twin control study

Open access
Kendler, Kenneth S., Myers, John, Damaj, M. Imad, Chen, Xianging·2013·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Early onset of regular smoking is associated with an elevated risk for later nicotine dependence. Whether or not this association is causal is unknown and has substantial public policy implications. METHOD: The authors used a monozygotic co-twin control study design. Pairs were selected from the Virginia Adult Twin Study of Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders for discordance in age at onset of regular smoking. Nicotine dependence was measured by the Fagerström test for nicotine dependence and level of craving. RESULTS: The authors identified 175 male-male and 69 female-female monozygotic twin pairs who differed by at least 2 years in age at onset of regular smoking. During their period of heaviest smoking, the twin who began smoking earlier had significantly higher Fagerström test scores in both the male-male (Cohen's d=0.20) and female-female twin pairs (d=0.26). Craving for cigarettes when unable to smoke was also higher in the early-onset member in both groups (male pairs, d=0.38; female pairs, d=0.25). The early-onset smoking twin did not differ from the later-onset twin in symptoms of alcohol or cannabis abuse or dependence, current alcohol use, or maximal level of cannabis, sedative, stimulant, or cocaine use. CONCLUSIONS: Controlling for genetic and familial-environmental effects, age at onset of regular smoking predicted level of nicotine dependence. Consistent with the animal literature, these findings suggest that in humans, early nicotine exposure directly increases level of later nicotine dependence. These results should be interpreted in the context of the methodological strengths and limitations of the monozygotic co-twin design.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12030321

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This also provides a biological basis for the clinical observation that the age of first cigarette use is a critical determinant of tobacco dependence, with those who begin in their early teens having the greatest difficulty quitting.

    “This also provides a biological basis for the clinical observation that the age of first cigarette use is a critical determinant of tobacco dependence, with those who begin in their early teens having the greatest difficulty quitting [157,158].”

    From Nicotine on the developing brain. (2023) · cites this paper as [158]

    The Results report that twins who began regular smoking earlier had higher later nicotine-dependence scores, and the Discussion says the findings suggest—but do not prove—a causal link. The study measured onset of regular smoking, not age at first cigarette use, and the cited passages do not establish that early-teen starters have the greatest difficulty quitting. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kendler, K. S., Myers, J., Damaj, M. I., & Chen, X.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2013-04
Volume
170
Issue
4
Pages
408-413
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2117546511
Cited by
177
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH040828, MH 40828, R01MH049492)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (/DA-49492, R01DA011287, K01DA019498, DA-019498, DA011287)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR031990)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
early smoking onset, nicotine dependence, monozygotic twin discordance, nicotine craving, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence, tobacco use, alcohol and cannabis use
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Sex Characteristics, Smoking, Tobacco Use Disorder, Twins, Monozygotic, Virginia, Behavior, Addictive, Age of Onset, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review