Cited by 411Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Toward a comprehensive developmental model for major depression in men

Kendler, Kenneth S., Gardner, Charles O., Prescott, Carol A.·2006·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The multiple risk factors for major depression are interrelated through poorly understood developmental pathways. In 2002, the authors presented a developmental model for major depression in women. Based on similar methods, they here present an analogous model for men. METHOD: Using data from 2,935 adult male twins, interviewed twice over a 2–4-year period, the authors constructed, by means of structural equation modeling, an integrated etiologic model for major depression that predicts depressive episodes over 1 year from 18 risk factors conceptualized as five developmental “tiers” reflecting childhood, early adolescence, late adolescence, adulthood, and the last year. RESULTS: The best-fitting model, including six correlations and 76 paths, provided a good fit to the data, explaining 49% of the variance in the liability to depressive episodes. The overall results, similar to those seen in women, suggest that the development of major depression results from the action and interaction of three broad pathways of internalizing symptoms, externalizing symptoms, and adversity. Childhood parental loss and low self-esteem were more potent variables in the model in men than in women. Genetic risks for major depression had a broader spectrum of action in men than in women. The pathway to major depression through externalizing symptoms was not more prominent in men than in women. CONCLUSIONS: Major depression in men, as in women, is an etiologically complex disorder influenced by risk factors from multiple domains that act in developmental time. The similarities in etiologic pathways to major depression for men and women outweigh the modest differences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.115

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased rates of major depression follow dependent stressful life events and prior depressive episodes.

    “Increased rates of MD follow dSLEs7–9 and PDEs.10–12”
  • Because numerous risk factors for major depression, including genes and childhood adversities, have long-lasting effects, the tendency for major depression to recur could arise without one depressive episode having a causal effect on the next.

    “Because numerous risk factors for MD—including genes and childhood adversities—have long-lasting effects,11,12,22,23 the tendency for MD to recur could arise without one depressive episode having a causal effect on the next.”
  • The association of dSLEs with MD is typically stronger than that observed for independent SLEs.

    “We specifically studied dSLEs because their causal relationship with psychiatric illness is inherently unclear and their association with MD is typically stronger than that observed for independent SLEs.11,12”
  • Previous analyses in this and other samples found that, in the presence of many covariates, PDEs modestly predict risk for future depressive episodes.

    “This interpretation is consistent with previous analyses in this11,12 and other10 samples in which, in the presence of many covariates, PDEs modestly predict risk for future depressive episodes.”
  • Stress exposure is considered to be the main environmental cause associated with the development of depression.

    “Stress exposure is considered to be the main environmental cause associated with the development of depression.”

    From P2X7 Receptor Signaling in Stress and Depression (2019) · cites this paper as [1]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kendler, K. S., Gardner, C. O., & Prescott, C. A.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2006-01-01
Volume
163
Issue
1
Pages
115-124
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W4230784232
Cited by
411
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 29
FWCI
19.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA-09095, MH/AA/DA-49492, AA-00236)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 40828)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA11287)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
major depressive disorder, men, developmental model, etiology, risk factors, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, childhood adversity, parental loss, low self-esteem, genetic risk, gender differences, depressive episodes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review