Cited by 67Treatment of Major DepressionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Medial prefrontal aberrations in major depressive disorder revealed by cytoarchitectonically informed voxel-based morphometry

Open access
Bludau, Sebastian, Bzdok, Danilo, Gruber, Oliver, Kohn, Nils, Riedl, Valentin, Sorg, Christian, Palomero-Gallagher, Nicola, Müller, Veronika I. +3 more·2016·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The heterogeneous human frontal pole has been identified as a node in the dysfunctional network of major depressive disorder. The contribution of the medial (socio-affective) versus lateral (cognitive) frontal pole to major depression pathogenesis is currently unclear. The authors performed morphometric comparison of the microstructurally informed subdivisions of human frontal pole between depressed patients and comparison subjects using both uni- and multivariate statistics. METHOD: Multisite voxel- and region-based morphometric MRI analysis was conducted in 73 depressed patients and 73 matched comparison subjects without psychiatric history. Frontal pole volume was first compared between depressed patients and comparison subjects by subdivision-wise classical morphometric analysis. In a second approach, frontal pole volume was compared by subdivision-naive multivariate searchlight analysis based on support vector machines. RESULTS: Subdivision-wise morphometric analysis found a significantly smaller medial frontal pole in depressed patients, with a negative correlation of disease severity and duration. Histologically uninformed multivariate voxel-wise statistics provided converging evidence for structural aberrations specific to the microstructurally defined medial area of the frontal pole in depressed patients. CONCLUSIONS: Across disparate methods, subregion specificity in the left medial frontal pole volume in depressed patients was demonstrated. Indeed, the frontal pole was shown to structurally and functionally connect to other key regions in major depression pathology, such as the anterior cingulate cortex and the amygdala via the uncinate fasciculus. Present and previous findings consolidate the left medial portion of the frontal pole as particularly altered in major depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15030349

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bludau, S., Bzdok, D., Gruber, O., Kohn, N., Riedl, V., Sorg, C., Palomero-Gallagher, N., Müller, V. I., Hoffstaedter, F., Amunts, K., & Eickhoff, S. B.
Affiliations
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
  • From the Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany; the Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany; the Center for Translational Research in Systems Neuroscience and Psychiatry, Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; the Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of...
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2016-03-01
Volume
173
Issue
3
Pages
291-298
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2175558603
Cited by
67
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (604102, 2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, FP7/2007)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (, EI 816/6-1, LA 3071/3‐1, 816/4-1, 3071/3-1, FP7/2007–2013, EI 816/4–1)
  • Servier
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH074457, EI 816/6-, MH074457)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
major depressive disorder, brain structural changes, medial prefrontal cortex, disease severity, disease duration, anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, uncinate fasciculus, searchlight analysis, support vector machine, cytoarchitecture
MeSH terms
Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Organ Size, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review