Cited by 50Medication Adherence and ComplianceMental Health Treatment and AccessFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Effects of Caregivers' Perceived Stigma and Causal Beliefs on Patients' Adherence to Antidepressant Treatment

Sher, Iris, McGinn, Lata, Sirey, Jo Anne, Meyers, Barnett·2005·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Nonadherence to prescribed medications is a significant problem in the treatment of mood disorders. Previously proposed adherence models have not been sufficiently accurate in identifying patients who do not adhere to treatment. This study evaluated the importance of the social context in adherence by using a prospective, longitudinal analysis. Specifically, this study evaluated the effects of caregivers' causal beliefs about depression and their perceptions of stigma on three-month treatment adherence among patients with depression. METHODS: Fifty patients with major depressive disorder and their primary caregivers were identified at a psychiatric hospital's outpatient clinic. Attributions for the causes of depression (either cognitive and attitudinal or medical and biological) and perceived stigma were assessed among caregivers at baseline, and patients' adherence was evaluated three-months after treatment began. RESULTS: Data were available for 47 patients at follow-up. Caregivers' attribution of depression to cognitive and attitudinal problems significantly predicted patients' decreased adherence. However, the degree of patients' adherence was not predicted by caregivers' attributions to medical and biological causes and caregivers' perceived stigma. CONCLUSIONS: The findings stress the importance of patients' social environment in determining treatment adherence and the necessity of educating caregivers about the impact that their causal attributions have on patients' behavior. Involving caregivers in treatment may improve their attitude toward patients with depression and, in doing so, enhance patients' adherence and outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.56.5.564

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sher, I., McGinn, L., Sirey, J. A., & Meyers, B.
Affiliations
Yeshiva University (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2005-05
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
564-569
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2099567712
Cited by
50
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH066381)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
medication adherence, antidepressants, major depressive disorder, caregiver stigma, causal beliefs, attribution theory, caregiver involvement, mood disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New York, Patient Compliance, Prejudice, Caregivers, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review