Cited by 12Emotions and Moral BehaviorResilience and Mental HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Self-conscious affects: their adaptive functions and relationship to depressive mood

Uji, Masayo, Kitamura, Toshinori, Nagata, Toshiaki·2011·American Journal of Psychotherapy

Abstract

This study used a structural equation model to examine the influence of resilience on the four self-conscious affects (guilt-proneness, shame-proneness, externalization, and detachment) assessed in the Test of Self-Conscious Affect-3 (TOSCA-3) and their impact on depressive mood. Our subject population consisted of 447 Japanese university students. The first analysis explored which TOSCA-3 affects help an individual adapt to stressful situations. The concept of "resilience" was used as an indicator to evaluate the adaptive functions. We based this on the assumption that an individual with higher resilience is able to use more adaptive affects. In the second analysis, taking the above relationship between resilience and the self-conscious affects into consideration, we examined how those variables as well as a negative life event are related to depressive mood. To assess the resilience level and depressive mood, we adopted the Resilience Scale (RS) and Self-rating Depressive Scale (SDS), respectively. The first analysis showed that the more resilient an individual was, the more prone they were to "detachment" and the less "shame" they experienced. The level of resilience did not have a significant effect on "guilt" or "externalization." In the second analysis we found that "resilience" had a direct inverse effect on depressive mood that was also mediated by "shame" and "detachment." We discuss how the particular self-conscious affects comprising each adaptive function are related to depressive mood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2011.65.1.27

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uji, M., Kitamura, T., & Nagata, T.
Affiliations
  • Kumamoto University (JP)
  • Kyushu University of Nursing and Social Welfare (JP)
Venue
American Journal of Psychotherapy
Published
2011-01
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
27-46
ISSN
  • 0002-9564 (ISSN-L)
  • 2575-6559
OpenAlex
W228417220
Cited by
12
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
self-conscious emotions, resilience, depressive mood, guilt proneness, shame proneness, externalization, detachment, adaptive function, negative life events, university students, Japanese students
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Depression, Female, Guilt, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Models, Psychological, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review