Cited by 111Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A neuropsychological comparison of depressed suicide attempters and nonattempters

King, Deborah A., Conwell, Yeates, Cox, Christopher, Henderson, Robin E., Denning, Diane G., Caine, Eric D.·2000·The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Abstract

The neuropsychological performance of 18 older inpatients with major depression who were admitted following a suicide attempt was compared with that of 29 older depressed inpatients who had never attempted suicide. There was an interactive effect of age and group on the Trail Making Test, part B, such that attempters showed greater performance declines with age. No other differences were detected between groups on a range of neuropsychological tasks. These findings are discussed in the context of the methodological limitations of previous studies and the need for future research to better elucidate the nature of the relationships between age, cognitive functioning, and suicidal behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/jnp.12.1.64

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Keilp and colleagues found that adult suicide attempters performed poorly on frontal executive tasks relative to controls, similar to King and colleagues' observation in older adult attempters.

    “Keilp and colleagues found that adult suicide attempters performed poorly on frontal executive tasks relative to controls (33), a similar observation to one made by King and colleagues in older adult attempters (34).”

    From Suicide in older adults (2011) · cites this paper as [34]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, D. A., Conwell, Y., Cox, C., Henderson, R. E., Denning, D. G., & Caine, E. D.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Published
2000-02
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
64-70
ISSN
  • 0895-0172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7222
OpenAlex
W2166778848
Cited by
111
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuropsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 40381, MH51201, R01MH051201)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
suicide attempters, major depressive disorder, older adults, neuropsychological performance, cognitive function, Trail Making Test, age differences, suicidal behavior, cognitive decline
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Risk Factors, Suicide, Attempted, Neurocognitive Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review