Cited by 128Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Deficit of cognitive inhibition in depressed elderly: a neurocognitive marker of suicidal risk

Open access
Richard-Devantoy, S., Jollant, F., Kefi, Z., Turecki, G., J.P.Olié, Annweiler, C., Beauchet, O., Le Gall, D.·2012·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Cognitive deficits, in relation to ventral and dorsal prefrontal cortex dysfunctions, have been associated with a higher risk of suicidal acts in young adult patients. Although a public health concern, much less is known about the neurocognitive basis of suicidal behavior in elderly. Here, we aimed at assessing alterations in cognitive inhibition, a suspected major mechanism of the suicidal vulnerability, in suicidal depressed elderly.Methods We compared 20 currently depressed patients, aged 65 and older who recently attempted suicide to 20 elderly subjects with a current depression but no personal history of suicide attempt and 20 elderly controls. Using an extensive neuropsychological battery, we particularly examined different aspects of cognitive inhibition: access to relevant information (using the Reading with distraction task), suppression of no longer relevant information (Trail Making Test, Rule Shift Cards), and restraint of cognitive resources to relevant information (Stroop test, Hayling Sentence Completion test, Go/No-Go).Results After adjustment for age, intensity of depression, Mini-Mental State Examination score and speed of information processing, suicidal depressed elderly showed significant impairments in all 3 domains of cognitive inhibition in comparison to both control groups.Limitations Our results need replication in a larger sample size.Conclusions Our study suggests that the inability to inhibit neutral information access to working memory, restrain and delete irrelevant information may impair the patient's capacity to respond adequately to stressful situations subsequently leading to an increased risk of suicidal behavior during late-life depression. Interventions may be developed to specifically target cognitive impairment in the prevention of suicide in depressed elderly.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.006

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher false alarm rates in attempters (failure to inhibit responding to a No-Go target) are observed on the Go/No-Go Task.

    “Higher false alarm rates in attempters (i.e., failure to inhibit responding to a No-Go target) ( Richard-Devantoy et al., 2012 , 2016b ; Westheide et al., 2008 ).”

    From Toward objective characterizations of suicide risk: A narrative review of laboratory-based cognitive and behavioral tasks (2023) · cites this paper as Richard-Devantoy et al., 2012

    Section 3.2.3 (page unavailable) reports that depressed elderly suicide attempters made more Go/No-Go errors than both control groups, supporting the direction of the comparison. The paper does not identify those errors as false alarms to No-Go targets or report false-alarm rates specifically. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richard-Devantoy, S., Jollant, F., Kefi, Z., Turecki, G., J.P.Olié, Annweiler, C., Beauchet, O., & Le Gall, D.
Affiliations
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
  • Laboratoire de Psychologie des Pays de la Loire (FR)
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
140
Issue
2
Pages
193-199
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091687415
Cited by
128
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7
FWCI
10.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
cognitive inhibition, geriatric depression, suicide risk, suicide attempts, older adults, neurocognitive markers, prefrontal cortex dysfunction, Stroop task, go/no-go task, Trail Making Test, suicide prevention
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Risk Factors, Suicide, Attempted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review