Cited by 77Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMental Health Treatment and Access

Developing a roadmap for the translation of e-mental health services for depression

Open access
Batterham, Philip J, Sunderland, Matthew, Calear, Alison L, Davey, Christopher G, Christensen, Helen, Teesson, Maree, Kay-Lambkin, Frances, Andrews, Gavin +4 more·2015·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: e-Mental health services have been shown to be effective and cost-effective for the treatment of depression. However, to have optimal impact in reducing the burden of depression, strategies for wider reach and uptake are needed. Method: A review was conducted to assess the evidence supporting use of e-mental health programmes for treating depression. From the review, models of dissemination and gaps in translation were identified, with a specific focus on characterising barriers and facilitators to uptake within the Australian healthcare context. Finally, recommendations for promoting the translation of e-mental health services in Australia were developed. Results: There are a number of effective and cost-effective e-health applications available for treating depression in community and clinical settings. Four primary models of dissemination were identified: unguided, health service–supported, private ownership and clinically guided. Barriers to translation include clinician reluctance, consumer awareness, structural barriers such as funding and gaps in the translational evidence base. Conclusion: Key strategies for increasing use of e-mental health programmes include endorsement of e-mental health services by government entities, education for clinicians and consumers, adequate funding of e-mental health services, development of an accreditation system, development of translation-focused activities and support for further translational research. The impact of these implementation strategies is likely to include economic gains, reductions in disease burden and greater availability of more interventions for prevention and treatment of mental ill-health complementary to existing health and efficient evidence-based mental health services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004867415582054

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Batterham, P. J., Sunderland, M., Calear, A. L., Davey, C. G., Christensen, H., Teesson, M., Kay-Lambkin, F., Andrews, G., Mitchell, P. B., Herrman, H., Butow, P. N., & Krouskos, D.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Black Dog Institute (AU)
  • NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Centre for Culture, Ethnicity & Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2015-04-23
Volume
49
Issue
9
Pages
776-784
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2167898569
Cited by
77
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
  • National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China
  • National Mental Health Commission
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
e-mental health, depression, digital mental health interventions, implementation barriers and facilitators, dissemination model, clinical translation, consumer awareness, accreditation
MeSH terms
Australia, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depression, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Mental Health Services, Telemedicine, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review