Cited by 27Digital Mental Health InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guided internet- and mobile-based depression intervention for individuals with chronic back pain: protocol of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial

Open access
Lin, Jiaxi, Sander, Lasse, Paganini, Sarah, Schlicker, Sandra, Ebert, David, Berking, Matthias, Bengel, Jürgen, Nobis, Stephanie +4 more·2017·BMJ Open

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Depression often co-occurs with chronic back pain (CBP). Internet and mobile-based interventions (IMIs) might be a promising approach for effectively treating depression in this patient group. In the present study, we will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guided depression IMI for individuals with CBP (eSano BackCare-D) integrated into orthopaedic healthcare. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this multicentre randomised controlled trial of parallel design, the groups eSano BackCare-D versus treatment as usual will be compared. 210 participants with CBP and diagnosed depression will be recruited subsequent to orthopaedic rehabilitation care. Assessments will be conducted prior to randomisation and 9 weeks (post-treatment) and 6 months after randomisation. The primary outcome is depression severity (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17). Secondary outcomes are depression remission and response, health-related quality of life, pain intensity, pain-related disability, self-efficacy and work capacity. Demographic and medical variables as well as internet affinity, intervention adherence, intervention satisfaction and negative effects will also be assessed. Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis with additional per-protocol analyses. Moreover, a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis will be conducted from a societal perspective after 6 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All procedures are approved by the ethics committee of the Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg and the data security committee of the German Pension Insurance (Deutsche Rentenversicherung). The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented on international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00009272; Pre-results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015226

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 106 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [94]Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, et al Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 2006; 10: 287 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009 16095934 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, J., Sander, L., Paganini, S., Schlicker, S., Ebert, D., Berking, M., Bengel, J., Nobis, S., Lehr, D., Mittag, O., Riper, H., & Baumeister, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • University of Vechta (DE)
  • Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
Corresponding author
Baumeister, Harald
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-12
Volume
7
Issue
12
Pages
e015226
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2775963546
Cited by
27
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • VU Research Portal (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (acceptedVersion)
  • OPen Access Repositorium der Universität Ulm (OPARU) (Ulm University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Universität Ulm, Kommunikations- und Informationszentrum (kiz)
Funders
Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
depression, chronic back pain, online intervention, mobile-based interventions, guided self-help, orthopedic rehabilitation, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility analysis, depression severity, health-related quality of life, pain-related disability, self-efficacy, work capacity
MeSH terms
Adult, Back Pain, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depression, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Research Design, Severity of Illness Index, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Internet, Suicidal Ideation, Chronic Pain, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review