Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 134

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Specialized psychotherapies for adults with borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Oud, Matthijs, Arntz, Arnoud, Hermens, Marleen LM, Verhoef, Rogier, Kendall, Tim·2018·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Borderline personality disorder affects up to 2% of the population and is associated with poor functioning, low quality of life and increased mortality. Psychotherapy is the treatment of choice, but it is unclear whether specialized psychotherapies (dialectical behavior therapy, mentalization-based treatment, transference-focused therapy and schema therapy) are more effective than non-specialized approaches (e.g. protocolized psychological treatment, general psychiatric management). The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of these psychotherapies. Methods: PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched from inception to November 2017. Included randomized controlled trials were assessed on risk of bias and outcomes were meta-analyzed. Confidence in the results was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method. The review has been reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: A total of 20 studies with 1375 participants were included. Specialized psychotherapies, when compared to treatment as usual or community treatment by experts, were associated with a medium effect based on moderate quality evidence on overall borderline personality disorder severity (standardized mean difference = –0.59 [95% confidence interval: –0.90, –0.28]), and dialectical behavior therapy, when compared to treatment as usual, with a small to medium effect on self-injury (standardized mean difference = –0.40 [95% confidence interval: –0.66, –0.13]). Other effect estimates were often inconclusive, mostly due to imprecision. Conclusion: There is moderate quality evidence that specialized psychotherapies are effective in reducing overall borderline personality disorder severity. However, further research should identify which patient groups profit most of the specialized therapies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004867418791257

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Study selection.
Figure 1. Study selection.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Risk of bias summary.
Figure 2. Risk of bias summary.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Forest plot of post hoc analysis on overall BPD severity at post-treatment.
Figure 3. Forest plot of post hoc analysis on overall BPD severity at post-treatment.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1136/bmj.319.7211.709a · DOI
  2. 10.1371/journal.pone.0107748 · DOI
  3. Cohen J, 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
  4. 10.1037/ccp0000115 · DOI
  5. 10.1001/archpsyc.63.6.649 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1176/ps.62.11.pss6211_1381 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/9780470712184 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2012.01923.x · DOI
  10. 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.062984 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16770-6 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Linehan MM, 1993, Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder
  13. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.3039 · DOI · Paper page
  14. NICE, 2009, Borderline Personality Disorder: Recognition and Management (Clinical Guideline [CG78])
  15. Nordic Cochrane Centre, 2014, Review Manager (Revman) Version 5.3
  16. 10.1159/000338897 · DOI
  17. 10.3109/09540261.2011.588200 · DOI
  18. Stoffers JM, 2012, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8
  19. Torgersen S, 2012, The Oxford Handbook of Personality Disorders, 186
  20. 10.1016/j.brat.2004.09.008 · DOI
  21. Zanarini MC, 2010, Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 22, 75

Cited by

See all 134

Metadata

Authors
Oud, M., Arntz, A., Hermens, M. L., Verhoef, R., & Kendall, T.
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2018-08-09
Volume
52
Issue
10
Pages
949-961
ISSN
  • 0004-8674
  • 1440-1614
Cited by
134
References
29
Language
en
Funders
Kwaliteitsontwikkeling GGz (PV130006)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.