CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,077Employer Branding and e-HRMCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingCorporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Corporate Social Performance As a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce

Open access
Greening, Daniel W., Turban, Daniel B.·2000·Business & Society
DOI 10.1177/000765030003900302
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Several researchers have suggested that a talented, quality workforce will become a more important source of competitive advantage for firms in the future. Drawing on social identity theory and signaling theory, the authors hypothesize that firms can use their corporate social performance (CSP) activities to attract job applicants. Specifically, signaling theory suggests that a firm’s CSP sends signals to prospective job applicants about what it would be like to work for a firm. Social identity theory suggests that job applicants have higher self-images whenworking for socially responsive firms over their less responsive counterparts. The authors conducted an experiment in which they manipulated CSP and found that prospective job applicants are more likely to pursue jobs from socially responsible firms than from firms with poor social performance reputations. The implications of these findings for academicians and practitioners alike are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000765030003900302

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 76 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Allred, B. B., 1996, Academy of Management Executive, 10, 17
  2. Brenner, S. N., Proceedings of the International Association of Business and Society
  3. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2000, Economy at a glance
  4. 10.5465/amr.1979.4498296 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Gatewood, R. D., annual meeting of the Academy of Management
  7. 10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Shelton, K., 1999, The College of Business and Public Administration
  9. Snell, S., 1996, Research and Human Resources Management, 14, 61
  10. Thurow, L. C., 1992, Sloan Management Review, 33, 5
  11. 1996, Business & Society, 35, 216

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,001

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Venue
Business & Society
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2000-09
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
254-280
ISSN
  • 0007-6503 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4205
DOI
10.1177/000765030003900302
OpenAlex
W2117735303
Semantic Scholar
f598e2010b9b3a5ac67a5db26889bd18517c6a23
Cited by
2,077
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 151 · 2022: 145 · 2021: 143 · 2020: 134 · 2019: 152 · 2018: 123 · 2017: 107 · 2016: 109 · 2015: 131 · 2014: 130 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 94
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Business & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
Keywords
corporate social performance, competitive advantage, talent attraction, job applicants, social identity theory, signaling theory, corporate social responsibility, candidate recruitment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review