The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploringthe Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness
Abstract
Building on existing studies suggesting that corporate social performance (CSP) is important in the job choice process, the authors investigate job seekers’perceptions of importance of CSP and explore effects of CSP dimensions on organizational attractiveness. Job seekers consider CSP important to assessment of firms and rate five specific CSP dimensions (environment, community relations, employee relations, diversity, and product issues) as more important than six other CSP dimensions. Using signaling theory and social identity theory, the authors hypothesize differences in effects of CSP data on ratings of employer attractiveness and find that environment, community relations, and diversity dimensions have the largest affect on attractiveness ratings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
(2001) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2001.s574 · Cited by 9,278
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949
Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2695870 · Cited by 4,464
Corporate Social Performance As a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce
Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/000765030003900302 · Cited by 2,077
Chaiken, S., & Stangor, C. (1987) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.003043 · Cited by 518
Cited by
Green Human Resource Management: A Review and Research Agenda*
Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x · Cited by 2,586
Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility
Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.50.1.51 · Cited by 1,116
Kramar, R. (2014) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2013.816863 · Cited by 960
The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment
Peterson, D. K. (2004) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650304268065 · Cited by 781
A systematic review on green human resource management: Implications for social sustainability
Amrutha, V. N., & Geetha, S. N. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119131 · Cited by 685
Corporate reputation: A combination of social responsibility and industry
Melo, T., & Garrido‐Morgado, A. (2012) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.260 · Cited by 476
Antecedents of CSR Practices in MNCs’ Subsidiaries: A Stakeholder and Institutional Perspective
Yang, X., & Rivers, C. (2009) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0191-0 · Cited by 371
Modeling corporate citizenship, organizational trust, and work engagement based on attachment theory
Lin, C.-P. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0279-6 · Cited by 237
Donia, M. B. L., Ronen, S., Tetrault Sirsly, C.-A., & Bonaccio, S. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3673-5 · Cited by 193
The impact of human resource management on corporate social performance strengths and concerns
Rothenberg, S., Hull, C. E., & Tang, Z. (2017) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650315586594 · Cited by 95
Improving global environmental management with standard corporate reporting
Kareiva, P. M., McNally, B. W., McCormick, S., Miller, T., & Ruckelshaus, M. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1408120111 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Backhaus, K. B., Stone, B. A., & Heiner, K.
- Venue
- Business & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 292-318
- ISSN
- 0007-6503 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4205
- OpenAlex
- W2068513234
- Cited by
- 722
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
