Cited by 136Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

Suicide among Black Children: An Integrated Model of the Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicide and Intersectionality Theory for Researchers and Clinicians

Open access
Opara, Ijeoma, Assan, Maame Araba, Pierre, Kimberly, Gunn, John F., Metzger, Isha, Hamilton, Jahi, Arugu, Eileen·2020·Journal of Black Studies

Abstract

Recently, research has reported that the rates of suicide among Black children between the ages of 5 to 12-years-old are increasing as they are now more likely to commit suicide than White children. Yet, there are very few, if any, frameworks being used by researchers to explain the risks of suicide among Black children. Suicide research has overwhelmingly been focused on White youth thus leaving a critical gap in suicide research. This conceptual paper provides an integrated framework using the Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicide and Intersectionality theory, as a guide for researchers, clinicians, and practitioners to incorporate culturally appropriate techniques in their work as a way to prevent suicide among Black children. This framework highlights racial discrimination, mental health, socioeconomic status, and sexual/gender minority status to be the most preeminent, yet understudied factors leading to suicide risk among Black children in the United States.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0021934720935641

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bronfenbrenner U, & Morris PA (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In Lerner RM (Ed.), Handbook of child development: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 793– 828). Wiley.
  2. Joiner TE Jr. (2005). Why people die by suicide. Harvard University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Opara, I., Assan, M. A., Pierre, K., Gunn, J. F., Metzger, I., Hamilton, J., & Arugu, E.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Public Health Management Corporation (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Opara, Ijeoma
Venue
Journal of Black Studies
Published
2020-06-15
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
611-631
ISSN
  • 0021-9347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4566
OpenAlex
W3035132964
Cited by
136
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 1
FWCI
7.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Black Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R25MH087217)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
child suicide, Black children, interpersonal theory of suicide, intersectionality, suicide prevention, racial discrimination, socioeconomic status, sexual and gender minority youth, mental health, culturally sensitive interventions, suicide risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review