Cited by 231Political Conflict and GovernancePost-Soviet Geopolitical DynamicsTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Shirts Today, Skins Tomorrow: Dual Contests and the Effects of Fragmentation in Self-Determination Disputes

Open access

Abstract

While theoretical models of conflict often treat actors as unitary, most self-determination groups are fragmented into a number of competing internal factions. This article presents a framework for understanding the “dual contests” that self-determination groups engage in—the first with their host state and the second between co-ethnic factions within groups. Using a new data set of the number of factions within a sample of self-determination groups from 1960 to 2008, the authors find that competition between co-ethnic factions is a key determinant of their conflict behavior. More competing factions are associated with higher instances of violence against the state as well as more factional fighting and attacks on co-ethnic civilians. More factions using violence increases the chances that other factions will do so, and the entry of a new faction prompts violence from existing factions in a within-group contest for political relevance. These findings have implications for both theory and policy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022002711429697

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.7551/mitpress/6261.001.0001 · DOI
  2. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014205.003.0009 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/2991857 · DOI
  4. 10.1017/CBO9780511613593 · DOI
  5. Bennett D. Scott., 2008, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11
  6. 10.1177/0022002703252368 · DOI
  7. 10.2307/20202305 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/S0020818304040251 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1017/CBO9780511755903.011 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/0022343310368336 · DOI
  11. Cederman Lars-Erik, 2009, “Ethnic Power Relations dataset,”
  12. 10.1093/oep/gpf064 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/0022002799043002005 · DOI
  14. 10.1017/S0003055411000013 · DOI
  15. 10.1017/CBO9780511510588 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/0022343304043770 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Filkins Dexter, 2008, The Forever War
  18. Findley Michael, British Journal of Political Science
  19. 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00222.x · DOI
  20. Gurr Ted R., 2000, Peoples Versus States
  21. Gurr Ted R., 2003, Peace and Conflict: A Global Survey of Armed Conflicts, Self-Determination Movements, and Democracy
  22. 10.1017/S0003055401000119 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/0022002706289303 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Horowitz Donald, 1985, Ethnic Groups in Conflict
  25. 10.1080/09636410801894191 · DOI
  26. 10.2307/525368 · DOI
  27. Judge Paramjit Singh, 2005, Religion, Identity and Nationhood: The Sikh Militant Movement
  28. 10.1017/S1537592703000355 · DOI
  29. 10.1017/CBO9780511818462 · DOI
  30. 10.1162/isec.21.2.108 · DOI
  31. 10.1353/wp.2004.0016 · DOI
  32. 10.2307/2669316 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.2307/2950687 · DOI
  34. 10.1017/S0003055409990323 · DOI
  35. 10.1017/S0003055404041401 · DOI
  36. Mann Michael, 2005, The Dark Side of Democracy Explaining Ethnic Cleansing
  37. 10.7551/mitpress/2660.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  38. MAR (Minorities at Risk Project), 2005, Minorities at Risk Dataset
  39. MAR (Minorities at Risk Project), 2008, Minorities at Risk Organizational Behavior Dataset
  40. Marshall Monty, 2008, Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2008
  41. 10.1162/isec.2009.33.3.79 · DOI
  42. Popkin Samuel, 1988, In Rationality and Revolution
  43. 10.1515/9780691213989 · DOI
  44. Rabushka Alvin, 1972, Politics in Plural Societies: A Theory of Democratic Instability
  45. 10.1177/0022002704273441 · DOI
  46. 10.7312/roth91044 · DOI
  47. Snyder Jack, 2000, From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict
  48. 10.1162/isec.22.2.5 · DOI
  49. Toft Monica Duffy, 2003, The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests, and the Indivisibility of Territory
  50. 10.1162/isec.2007.31.4.97 · DOI
  51. 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00308.x · DOI · Paper page
  52. Varshney Ashutosh, 2002, Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life
  53. 10.1177/0022002708315594 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00186.x · DOI
  55. 10.1162/002081802320005487 · DOI
  56. Weinstein Jeremy, 2007, Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence

Cited by

See all 231

Metadata

Authors
Cunningham, K. G., Bakke, K. M., & Seymour, L. J. M.
Affiliations
  • Peace Research Institute Oslo (NO)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Cunningham, Kathleen Gallagher
Venue
Journal of Conflict Resolution
Published
2012-02
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
67-93
ISSN
  • 0022-0027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8766
OpenAlex
W2598553948
Cited by
231
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
33.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Conflict Resolution (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Keywords
factional competition, conflict behavior, civilian targeting, ethnic conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review