The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-language Perception of Non-native Tonal Contrasts: Effects of Native Phonological and Phonetic Influences
Open accessAbstract
This study examined the perception of the four Mandarin lexical tones by Mandarin-naïve Hong Kong Cantonese, Japanese, and Canadian English listener groups. Their performance on an identification task, following a brief familiarization task, was analyzed in terms of tonal sensitivities (A-prime scores on correct identifications) and tonal errors (confusions). The A-prime results revealed that the English listeners’ sensitivity to Tone 4 identifications specifically was significantly lower than that of the other two groups. The analysis of tonal errors revealed that all listener groups showed perceptual confusion of tone pairs with similar phonetic features (T1—T2, T1—T4 and T2—T3 pairs), but not of those with completely dissimilar features (T1—T3, T2—T4, and T3—T4). Language-specific errors were also observed in their performance, which may be explained within the framework of the Perceptual Assimilation Model (PAM: Best, 1995; Best & Tyler, 2007). The findings imply that linguistic experience with native tones does not necessarily facilitate non-native tone perception. Rather, the phonemic status and the phonetic features (similarities or dissimilarities) between the tonal systems of the target language and the listeners’ native languages play critical roles in the perception of non-native tones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Phonology of Standard Chinese
Duanmu, S. (2007) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199215782.001.0001 · Cited by 1,157
Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report
Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1894649 · Cited by 913
Tone perception in Far Eastern languages
Gandour, J. (1983) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30813-7 · Cited by 473
McCAWLEY, J. D. (1978) · Tone · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-267350-4.50009-1 · Cited by 181
Pitch accent in spoken-word recognition in Japanese.
Cutler, A., & Otake, T. (1999) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.426724 · Cited by 129
Cited by
What Can Lexical Tone Training Studies in Adults Tell Us about Tone Processing in Children?
Antoniou, M., & Chin, J. L. L. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00001 · Cited by 294
Beyond Segments: Towards a L2 Intonation Learning Theory
Mennen, I. (2015) · Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45168-7_9 · Cited by 117
BEYOND SEGMENTS: Prosody in SLA
Mennen, I., & de Leeuw, E. (2014) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263114000138 · Cited by 34
SECOND AND THIRD LANGUAGE LEARNERS’ SENSITIVITY TO JAPANESE PITCH ACCENT IS ADDITIVE
Wiener, S., & Goss, S. (2019) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263119000068 · Cited by 28
Shport, I. A. (2015) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4922468 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- So, C. K., & Best, C. T.
- Venue
- Language and Speech
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-05-17
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 273-293
- ISSN
- 0023-8309 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-6053
- OpenAlex
- W2126345904
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-language Perception of Non-native Tonal Contrasts: Effects of Native Phonological and Phonetic Influences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0023830909357156
- The paper
- So, C. K., & Best, C. T. (2010). Cross-language Perception of Non-native Tonal Contrasts: Effects of Native Phonological and Phonetic Influences. Language and Speech. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830909357156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.