Cited by 309Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The Development and Validation of the State Self-Compassion Scale (Long- and Short Form)

Neff, Kristin D., Tóth-Király, István, Knox, Marissa C., Kuchar, Ashley, Davidson, Oliver·2021·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-020-01505-4

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neff, K. D., Tóth-Király, I., Knox, M. C., Kuchar, A., & Davidson, O.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Neff, Kristin D.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2020-09-30
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
121-140
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W3091051561
Cited by
309
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 18
FWCI
10.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2018-0368)
  • Horizon Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Program
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
state self-compassion, Self-Compassion Scale, scale development, factor structure, bifactor model, positive and negative affect, psychometric validation, short-form scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review