Cited by 365Emotional Intelligence and PerformanceEmotions and Moral BehaviorGender Roles and Identity Studies

Sex Differences in Emotional Awareness

Barrett, Lisa Feldman, Lane, Richard D., Sechrest, Lee, Schwartz, Gary E.·2000·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

The present study examined sex differences in the complexity and differentiation of people’s representations of emotional experience. Female participants from seven different samples, ranging in age, scholastic performance, socioeconomic status, and culture, scored higher on a performance test of emotional awareness than did male participants. Women consistently displayed more complexity and dif ferentiation in their articulations of emotional experiences than did men, even when the effect of verbal intelligence was controlled. Together, the findings suggest that a sex difference in display of emotional awareness is a stable, highly generalizable effect. Implications of these findings are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01461672002611001

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women tend to represent their emotional experiences more complexly than men, including simultaneously appraising situations in both negative and positive ways.

    “Lastly, this idea fits with the fact that women tend to represent their emotional experiences more complexly than men, which includes simultaneously appraising situations in both negative and positive ways (Feldman Barrett, Lane, Sechrest, & Schwartz, 2000).”

    From Gender Differences in Emotion Regulation: An fMRI Study of Cognitive Reappraisal (2008) · cites this paper as Feldman Barrett, Lane, Sechrest, & Schwartz, 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrett, L. F., Lane, R. D., Sechrest, L., & Schwartz, G. E.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2000-11
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
1027-1035
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2058119571
Cited by
365
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
sex differences, emotional awareness, emotional experience, verbal intelligence, gender differences in emotion, emotion representation, cross-cultural generalizability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review