Cited by 411

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Don’t Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption

Bastian, Brock, Loughnan, Steve, Haslam, Nick, Radke, Helena R. M.·2012·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Many people like eating meat, but most are reluctant to harm things that have minds. The current three studies show that this dissonance motivates people to deny minds to animals. Study 1 demonstrates that animals considered appropriate for human consumption are ascribed diminished mental capacities. Study 2 shows that meat eaters are motivated to deny minds to food animals when they are reminded of the link between meat and animal suffering. Finally, Study 3 provides direct support for our dissonance hypothesis, showing that expectations regarding the immediate consumption of meat increase mind denial. Moreover, this mind denial in turn reduces negative affect associated with dissonance. The findings highlight the role of dissonance reduction in facilitating the practice of meat eating and protecting cultural commitments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167211424291

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1348/014466610X521383 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1992.tb00889.x · DOI
  5. Beardsworth A., 1997, Sociology on the menu: An invitation to the study of food and society
  6. 10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00119-3 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.appet.2004.10.003 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/ejsp.766 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.appet.2011.04.020 · DOI
  10. 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.804 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1177/1368430207071344 · DOI
  12. 10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.1105 · DOI
  13. 10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Fiddes N., 1991, Meat: A natural symbol
  15. Foer J. S., 2009, Eating animals
  16. 10.1037/a0013748 · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.1062872 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1177/01461672002612004 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/0146167202289001 · DOI
  20. 10.1024/0044-3514.38.1.7 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.1 · DOI
  22. 10.1037/10318-000 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.248 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.appet.2005.01.010 · DOI
  25. 10.1037/0033-2909.83.6.1014 · DOI
  26. 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.543 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.012 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.appet.2010.05.043 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1002/ejsp.755 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1136/jme.2005.013086 · DOI
  31. 10.1348/014466607X174356 · DOI
  32. 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.1 · DOI
  33. 10.1037/0022-3514.82.2.157 · DOI
  34. 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085555 · DOI
  35. Plous S., 2003, Understanding prejudice and discrimination, 509
  36. 10.1207/s15327019eb0702_2 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772690 · DOI
  38. Rozin P., 2004, Encyclopedia of food, 666
  39. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00685.x · DOI · Paper page
  40. Ryder R., 1971, Animals, men and morals, 41
  41. 10.1086/292273 · DOI
  42. 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.247 · DOI
  43. Singer P., 1990, Animal liberation
  44. 10.1037/0033-2909.127.5.629 · DOI
  45. Vialles N., 1994, Animal to edible
  46. Wennberg R. N., 2003, God, humans, and animals: An invitation to enlarge our moral universe

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 411

Metadata

Authors
Bastian, B., Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., & Radke, H. R. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
  • University of Kent, Kent, UK
  • University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2011-10-06
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
247-256
ISSN
  • 0146-1672
  • 1552-7433
Cited by
411
References
9
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review