The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Face–Time Continuum: Lifespan Changes in Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Impact Aging-Associated Perceptions
Abstract
Aging influences how a person is perceived on multiple dimensions (e.g., physical power). Here we examined how facial structure informs these evolving social perceptions. Recent work examining young adults’ faces has revealed the impact of the facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) on perceived traits, such that individuals with taller, thinner faces are perceived to be less aggressive, less physically powerful, and friendlier. These perceptions are similar to those stereotypically associated with older adults. Examining whether fWHR might contribute to these changing perceptions over the life span, we found that age provides a shifting context through which fWHR differentially impacts aging-related social perceptions (Study 1). In addition, archival analyses (Study 2) established that fWHR decreases across age, and a subsequent study found that fWHR mediated the relationship between target age and multiple aging-related perceptions (Study 3). The findings provide evidence that fWHR decreases across age and influences stereotypical perceptions that change with age.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our results do not confirm a decreasing mid-facial width-to-height ratio as claimed by Hehman, Leitner, and Freeman (2014).
“However, our results do not seem to confirm a decreasing mid‐facial width‐to‐height ratio as claimed by Hehman, Leitner, and Freeman (2014).”
From Facial aging trajectories: A common shape pattern in male and female faces is disrupted after menopause (2019) · cites this paper as Hehman, Leitner, and Freeman (2014)
Citations
Cites
Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review.
Pascoe, E. A., & Smart Richman, L. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0016059 · Cited by 4,427
Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap
Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285346 · Cited by 2,799
Cumming, G. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00079.x · Cited by 451
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 69
- Adams R. B., 2011, The science of social vision, 90
- Allport G., 1954, The nature of prejudice
- 10.2165/00007256-199214060-00005 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022022112466941 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008814 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.5 · DOI
- 10.1145/311535.311556 · DOI
- Bonnie R. J., 2003, Elder mistreatment: Abuse, neglect, and exploitation in an aging America
- Brewer M. B., 1988, Advances in social cognition, 1, 1
- 10.1037//0022-3514.41.4.656 · DOI
- 10.1177/1745691610393980 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0271-5309(86)90009-1 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2008.0873 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02423.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.885 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00405.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.005 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2002.2034 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10508-007-9266-0 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-3514.56.1.5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-9280.00262 · DOI
- 10.2307/1269918 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1089134 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0022327 · DOI
- 10.3389/fnint.2012.00081 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0030366 · DOI
- Grainger K., 1990, Communication health and the elderly, 192
- 10.1016/0005-2795(71)90226-1 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2011.1193 · DOI
- 10.1177/0956797612451467 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.015 · DOI
- 10.2165/00002018-200629050-00005 · DOI
- 10.1037/0882-7974.3.3.233 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.129 · DOI
- 10.1152/jappl.1979.46.3.451 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.03.005 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.93 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2006.24.5.540 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0538 · DOI
- 10.1037//0033-295X.90.3.215 · DOI
- Nussbaum J. F., 2012, Journal of Language and Social Psychology
- 10.1073/pnas.0805664105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S1930297500002205 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.04.003 · DOI
- 10.3102/10769986031004437 · DOI
- 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/FGR.2006.78 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/geront/17.3.210 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2008.1177 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.07.002 · DOI
- 10.1177/0049124189018002003 · DOI
- 10.1177/0956797610362647 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.evolhum-behav.2012.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.260 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0140 · DOI
- 10.1093/ejo/21.2.137 · DOI
- 10.1093/geronb/gbs121 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0000710 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajhb.21219 · DOI
- 10.1117/1.JBO.18.3.031108 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1300 · DOI
- 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0703_01 · DOI
- 10.1080/17470910701676236 · DOI
- 10.1037//0012-1649.28.6.1143 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2011.29.4.486 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Windhager, S., Mitteroecker, P., Rupić, I., Lauc, T., Polašek, O., & Schaefer, K. (2019) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.23878 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Hehman, E., Leitner, J. B., & Freeman, J. B.
- Affiliations
- New York University, New York, NY, USA
- University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-10-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1624-1636
- ISSN
- 0146-1672
- 1552-7433
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review