The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neosexism: Plus Ça Change, Plus C'est Pareil
Abstract
A scale designed to tap into a new type of gender prejudice, called neosexist beliefs, is proposed. Two studies investigating antecedents and consequences of neosexism were conducted. In the first study, a predictive model was tested with a sample of 130 male students. It was found, according to hypotheses, that considerations of collective interest (CI) and old-fashioned sexism had an impact on neosexism. However, only the latter and CI triggered opposition to affirmative action (AA). The second study evaluated the effects of CI and neosexism among a sample of 149 male workers employed in a firm where an exhaustive AA program was implemented. For example, it was found that support for the program in place and evaluations of women's qualifications were influenced both by neosexism and by CI. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Attitudes toward Desegregation
Hyman, H. H., & Sheatsley, P. B. (1956) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1256-35 · Cited by 195
Cited by
Intergroup Threat and Outgroup Attitudes: A Meta-Analytic Review
Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4 · Cited by 1,588
Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice.
Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33 · Cited by 1,086
Hostile and Benevolent Sexism: Measuring Ambivalent Sexist Attitudes Toward Women
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x · Cited by 905
Swim, J. K., & Cohen, L. L. (1997) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00103.x · Cited by 374
Harrison, D. A., Kravitz, D. A., Mayer, D. M., Leslie, L. M., & Lev-Arey, D. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1013 · Cited by 358
Understanding subtle sexism: detection and use of sexist language
Swim, J. K., Mallett, R., & Stangor, C. (2004) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1023/b:sers.0000037757.73192.06 · Cited by 169
Beyond Sexist Beliefs: How Do People Decide to Use Gender-Inclusive Language?
Sczesny, S., Moser, F., & Wood, W. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215585727 · Cited by 88
Gender-Blind Sexism and Rape Myth Acceptance’,
Stoll, L. C., Lilley, T. G., & Pinter, K. (2017) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801216636239 · Cited by 68
Attitudes toward women mediate the gender effect on attitudes toward sexist language
Parks, J. B., & Mary Ann, R. (2004) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00140.x · Cited by 62
Friedrich, M. C. G., & Heise, E. (2019) · Swiss Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1024/1421-0185/a000223 · Cited by 46
Formanowicz, M. M., Cisłak, A., Horvath, L. K., & Sczesny, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01617 · Cited by 38
Explaining age and gender effects on attitudes toward sexist language
Parks, J. B., & Roberton, M. A. (2005) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x05281427 · Cited by 23
Stoll, L. C., Lilley, T. G., & Block, R. (2021) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260518807912 · Cited by 14
What affects people’s use of and attitudes toward gender-inclusive language? A literature review
Lange, E., & von Stockhausen, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1657753 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 842-849
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2038537166
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
