CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 327Cultural Differences and ValuesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The Measurement of Values and Individualism-Collectivism

Oishi, Shigehiro, Schimmack, Uhich, Diener, Ed, Suh, Eunkook M.·1998·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
DOI 10.1177/01461672982411005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study presents alternative measures of S. H. Schwartz's theory of values using pairwise comparisons and goal concepts. Not only did the three measures of values-the Schwartz Value Survey (SVS), the Pairwise Comparison Value Survey (PCVS), and the Personal Striving Value Survey (PSVS) -converge but they were also correlated in similar ways with the Individualism-Collectivism Scale (ICS). This provides evidence that the newly developed scales can be alternatives to the SVS, which allows future studies of values using multiple measures. Moreover, the findings provide support for Schwartz's conception of values as higher order goals. The present findings have several implications for the study of values and their linkage to the study of individualism-collectivism and the self-concept.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01461672982411005

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Collectivistic attitudes are generally associated with an unwillingness to contact or otherwise interact with out-group members.

    “Along with an emphasis on interdependence, collectivistic attitudes are generally associated with an unwillingness to contact or otherwise interact with out-group members”

    From Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity (2012) · cites this paper as Oishi et al. 1998

  • Collectivists emphasize the boundary between in-group and out-group and are distrusting of and unwilling to contact out-group members; individualists make less distinction between in- and out-groups, and are more trusting of and show more willingness to contact out-groups.

    “Collectivists emphasize the boundary between in-group and out-group and are distrusting of and unwilling to contact out-group members; individualists make less distinction between in- and out-groups, and are more trusting of and show more willingness to contact out-groups”

    From Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity (2012) · cites this paper as Oishi et al. 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Oishi, S., Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Suh, E. M.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Oishi, Shigehiro
ORCID
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1998-11
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
1177-1189
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
DOI
10.1177/01461672982411005
OpenAlex
W2020800668
Cited by
327
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 23
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
value measurement, individualism-collectivism, Schwartz value theory, Schwartz Value Survey, pairwise comparison, self-concept, value scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review