The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can Good Principals Keep Teachers in Disadvantaged Schools? Linking Principal Effectiveness to Teacher Satisfaction and Turnover in Hard-to-Staff Environments
Abstract
Background: High rates of teacher turnover likely mean greater school instability, disruption of curricular cohesiveness, and a continual need to hire inexperienced teachers, who typically are less effective, as replacements for teachers who leave. Unfortunately, research consistently finds that teachers who work in schools with large numbers of poor students and students of color feel less satisfied and are more likely to turn over, meaning that turnover is concentrated in the very schools that would benefit most from a stable staff of experienced teachers. Despite the potential challenge that this turnover disparity poses for equity of educational opportunity and student performance gaps across schools, little research has examined the reasons for elevated teacher turnover in schools with large numbers of traditionally disadvantaged students. Purpose: This study hypothesizes that school working conditions help explain both teacher satisfaction and turnover. In particular, it focuses on the role of effective principals in retaining teachers, particularly in disadvantaged schools with the greatest staffing challenges. Research Design: The study conducts quantitative analyses of national data from the 2003-04 Schools and Staffing Survey and the 2004-05 Teacher Follow-up Survey. Regression analyses combat the potential for bias from omitted variables by utilizing an extensive set of control variables and employing a school district fixed effects approach that implicitly makes comparisons among principals and teachers within the same local context. Conclusions: Descriptive analyses confirm that observable measures of teachers’ work environments, including ratings of the effectiveness of the principal, are generally less positive in schools with large numbers of disadvantaged students. Regression results show that principal effectiveness is associated with greater teacher satisfaction and a lower probability that the teacher leaves the school within a year. Moreover, the positive impacts of principal effectiveness on these teacher outcomes are even greater in disadvantaged schools. These findings suggest that policies focused on getting the best principals into the most challenging school environments may be effective strategies for lowering perpetually high teacher turnover rates in those schools.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x · Cited by 4,501
Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational Analysis
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038003499 · Cited by 2,989 · cited 10×
“Note that these numbers are substantially lower than those calculated by Ingersoll (2001), who looked at data from a previous iteration of TFS and who based his calculations on whether or not teachers cited staffing decisions as one of the top three contributors to the turnover decision, not just…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSpillane, J. P. (2004) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737026002169 · Cited by 2,536
Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover.
Mobley, W. H. (1977) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.62.2.237 · Cited by 2,483
Sayre, P. L. (1927) · Indiana Magazine of History (Indiana University) · Cited by 1,759
Exploring the Principal's Contribution to School Effectiveness: 1980‐1995∗
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/0924345980090203 · Cited by 1,569
Teacher Sorting and the Plight of Urban Schools: A Descriptive Analysis
Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737024001037 · Cited by 1,454
Teacher Recruitment and Retention: A Review of the Recent Empirical Literature
Guarino, C. M., Santibañez, L., & Daley, G. A. (2006) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543076002173 · Cited by 1,328
Teacher Attrition and Retention: A Meta-Analytic and Narrative Review of the Research
Borman, G. D., & Dowling, N. M. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308321455 · Cited by 1,189
Pursuing a “Sense of Success”: New Teachers Explain Their Career Decisions
Johnson, S. M., & Birkeland, S. E. (2003) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312040003581 · Cited by 932
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Alliance for Excellent Education., 2005, Tapping the potential: Retaining and developing high-quality new teachers.
- Farkas S., 2000, A sense of calling: Who teaches and why.
- Ingersoll R., 2003, Is there really a teacher shortage?.
- Johnson S. M., 2005, Who stays in teaching and why: A review of the literature on teacher retention.
- Johnson S. M., 2003, Educational Leadership, 60, 20
- 10.1037/0021-9010.62.2.237 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.62.2.237 · Paper page
Cited by
A Coming Crisis in Teaching? Teacher Supply, Demand, and Shortages in the U.S.
Sutcher, L., Darling-Hammond, L., & Carver-Thomas, D. (2016) · doi:10.54300/247.242 · Cited by 718
The Influence of School Administrators on Teacher Retention Decisions
Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Ing, M., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2011) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831210380788 · Cited by 710
Teacher Turnover in High-Poverty Schools: What We Know and Can Do
Simon, N., & Johnson, S. M. (2015) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811511700305 · Cited by 554
Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2014) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373713519496 · Cited by 517
Grissom, J. A., & Loeb, S. (2011) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831211402663 · Cited by 386
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Grissom, J. A.
- Venue
- Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2552-2585
- ISSN
- 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0161-4681
- 1467-9620
- OpenAlex
- W94267534
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 53.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can Good Principals Keep Teachers in Disadvantaged Schools? Linking Principal Effectiveness to Teacher Satisfaction and Turnover in Hard-to-Staff Environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/016146811111301102
- The paper
- Grissom, J. A. (2011). Can Good Principals Keep Teachers in Disadvantaged Schools? Linking Principal Effectiveness to Teacher Satisfaction and Turnover in Hard-to-Staff Environments. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111301102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.