Cited by 87Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and careMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

The effects of a group-based cognitive behavioral therapy on people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Graziano, Federica, Calandri, Emanuela, Borghi, Martina, Bonino, Silvia·2014·Clinical Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a cognitive behavioral group-based intervention aimed at reducing depression and fostering quality of life and psychological well-being of multiple sclerosis patients through the promotion of identity redefinition, sense of coherence, and self-efficacy. Design: A randomized controlled trial. Setting: Non-medical setting, external to the Multiple Sclerosis Clinic Centre. Subjects: Eighty-two patients: 64% women; mean age 40.5, SD = 9.4; 95% with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) between 1 and 5.5 were included in the study. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to an intervention group (five cognitive behavioral group-based sessions, n = 41) or to a control group (three informative sessions, n = 41). Main measures: Depression (CES-D), Quality of life (MSQOL revised), Psychological well-being (PANAS), Identity Motives Scale, Sense of Coherence (SOC), and Self Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis. Results: Quality of life increased in the intervention group compared with the control at 6-months follow-up (mean change 0.72 vs. −1.76, p < 0.05). Well-being in the intervention group increased for males and slightly decreased for females at 6-months follow-up (mean change 6.58 vs. −0.82, p < 0.05). Contrasts revealed an increase in self-efficacy in the intervention group at posttreatment compared with the control (mean change 2.95 vs. −0.11, p < 0.05). Depression tended to lower, while identity and coherence increased in the intervention group compared with the control, though the differences were not significant. Conclusions: Preliminary evidence suggests that intervention promotes patients’ quality of life and has an effect on psychological well-being and self-efficacy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269215513501525

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous investigations found improvements in self-efficacy after wellness programs, cognitive behavioral interventions, and fatigue management programs.

    “Previous investigations have found improvements in self- efficacy following involvement in wellness programs,73 cognitive behavioral interventions,74 and fatigue management programs75”
  • At follow-up, the intervention groups in Calandri et al and Graziano et al had experienced an increase in quality of life.

    “At follow-up, the intervention groups in both studies had experienced an increase in QoL.”
  • Interventions designed to reinforce protective factors, including identity redefinition, sense of coherence, self-efficacy, resilience training and emotional regulation, were all successful in improving quality of life.

    “Several of the interventions were designed to reinforce protective factors in patients with MS. Graziano et al115 focused on identity redefinition, sense of coherence and self-efficacy. Pakenham et al119 implemented a programme based on resilience training, and the programme by Blair et al113 focused on the improvement of emotional regulation. All of them were successful in improving QoL,”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [14]14. Irvine FI, Davidson C, Floy K, et al. Psychosocial adjust­ ment to multiple sclerosis: Exploration of identity redefini­ tion. Disabil Rehab 2009; 31(8): 599-606.
  2. [17]17. Bonino S. Vivre avec la maladie chronique: les questions fondamentales que le patient doit aborder. In: A A .W . Modèles et pratiques en éducation du patient: apporti internationaux. Paris: INPES, 2010, pp.64-71.
  3. [22]22. Pierfederici A, Fava GA, Munari F, et al. Vahdazione itahana del CES-D per la misurazione della depressione [Itahan valida­ tion of CES-D for depression measurement]. In: R Canestrari. (ed.) Nuovi Metodi in Psicometria [New Methods in Psycho­ metrics], Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciah, 1982, pp.95-103.
  4. [24]24. Bami D and Tagliabue S. Sense of Coherence Scale di Antonovsky: un contributo alla validazione italiana [Antonovsky's Sense of Coherence Scale: a contribution to the Italian validation]. Testing, Psicometria, Metodologia 2005; 12(3): 151-166,
  5. [29]29. 29, McCabe MP, McKern S and McDonald E, Coping and psy­ chological adjustment among people with multiple sclero­ sis, JPsychosom Res 2004; 56(3): 355-361,
  6. [31]31. 31, Tesar N, Baumhackl U, Kopp M, et al. Effect of psychologi­ cal group therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis, Acta Neurol Scand 2003; 107: 394-399,

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graziano, F., Calandri, E., Borghi, M., & Bonino, S.
Affiliations
  • Cosso Foundation, Pinerolo, Torino, Italy
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Ospedale San Luigi Gonzaga (IT)
Venue
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2013-09-06
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
264-274
ISSN
  • 0269-2155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0873
OpenAlex
W2165793645
Cited by
87
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, cognitive behavioral therapy, group therapy, depression, quality of life, psychological well-being, self-efficacy, sense of coherence, identity redefinition, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, psychological intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Depression, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Psychotherapy, Group, Quality of Life, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Self Efficacy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review