Cited by 116Psychedelics and Drug StudiesForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The varieties of ecstatic experience: an exploration of the subjective experiences of ecstasy

Sumnall, Harry R., Cole, Jon C., Jerome, Lisa·2006·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Previous investigations of the subjective effects of MDMA (material sold as ecstasy) have conducted interviews and surveys of various groups of ecstasy users within particular sub-populations. This study examined subjective drug effects reported by different sub-populations of ecstasy users and explored whether the function or purpose served by using ecstasy influenced the nature of the drug experience. Drawing on previous measures of alterations in consciousness, psychedelic drugs and cannabis, and informal interviews with ecstasy users and MDMA researchers, a 130-item survey assessing subjective effects of ecstasy/MDMA was developed. Principal components analysis of responses of ecstasy users revealed six components; perceptual alterations, entactogenic effects, prosocial effects, aesthetic effects, negative effects and sexual effects. The derived scale was used to predict ecstasy use behaviours, and functions and experiences of use. A variety of component scores were related to ecstasy use parameters; in particular, heavier users expected fewer negative, perceptual and aesthetic effects from taking the drug. The reasons given for using ecstasy (use function) also influenced reported drug effects. Abstainers expected greater negative, perceptual, aesthetic and sexual effects than users. These data indicate that the subjective ecstasy experience is influenced by a variety of extra-psychopharmacological factors. Drug intervention strategies may be made more effective by targeting particular user groups defined by reasons given for substance use, as it is likely that their experiences of ecstasy effects will differ. Future research into ecstasy may be improved by recognizing user diversity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881106060764

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sumnall, H. R., Cole, J. C., & Jerome, L.
Affiliations
  • Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (US)
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2006-09
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
670-682
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2013498451
Cited by
116
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Anhui University of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
MDMA, ecstasy, subjective drug effects, perceptual alterations, prosocial effects, aesthetic effect, adverse outcomes, user heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Aged, Drug Interactions, Esthetics, Female, Hallucinogens, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Perception, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Sex Characteristics, Social Behavior, Social Environment, N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, Substance-Related Disorders, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review