Cited by 96Psychedelics and Drug StudiesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsTreatment of Major Depression

How could MDMA (ecstasy) help anxiety disorders? A neurobiological rationale

Johansen, PØ, Krebs, TS·2009·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Abstract Exposure therapy is known to be an effective treatment for anxiety disorders. Nevertheless, exposure is not used as much as it should be, and instead patients are often given supportive medications such as serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and benzodiazepines, which may even interfere with the extinction learning that is the aim of treatment. Given that randomized controlled trials are now investigating a few doses of ±3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ‘ecstasy’) in combination with psychotherapy for treatment-resistant anxiety disorders, we would like to suggest the following three mechanisms for this potentially important new approach: 1) MDMA increases oxytocin levels, which may strengthen the therapeutic alliance; 2) MDMA increases ventromedial prefrontal activity and decreases amygdala activity, which may improve emotional regulation and decrease avoidance and 3) MDMA increases norepinephrine release and circulating cortisol levels, which may facilitate emotional engagement and enhance extinction of learned fear associations. Thus, MDMA has a combination of pharmacological effects that, in a therapeutic setting, could provide a balance of activating emotions while feeling safe and in control, as described in case reports of MDMA-augmented psychotherapy. Further clinical and preclinical studies of the therapeutic value of MDMA are indicated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881109102787

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johansen, P., & Krebs, T.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway,
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2009-03-09
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
389-391
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2105541798
Cited by
96
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
MDMA, ecstasy, anxiety disorders, MDMA-assisted psychotherapy, exposure therapy, fear extinction, oxytocin, therapeutic relationship, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, norepinephrine, cortisol, emotion regulation, avoidance, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, benzodiazepines
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Avoidance Learning, Brain, Empathy, Fear, Humans, Psychotherapy, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review