The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Loafing on Group Projects: Structural Antecedents and Effect on Student Satisfaction
Abstract
To respond to the expectations of the industry and business school accreditation bodies, marketing faculty have been making extensive use of group projects in their curricula. A common problem with the use of student groups, however, is that of social loafing. In this study, we identify some easy-to-implement project set-up factors and examine their impact on reducing the incidence of social loafing. We find that the incidence of social loafing increases with the scope of the project and the size of the student group assigned to the project. We also find that having multiple peer evaluations during the course of the project reduces social loafing. We study the impact of social loafing on students' satisfaction with group members' contribution and the perceived fairness of the project grade. Recommendations for reducing social loafing and increasing students' satisfaction with group projects are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Research works printed but not linked: 53
- 10.1177/0273475304273350 · DOI
- Aronson, E., 1978, The jigsaw classroom
- Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business., 2007, Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation
- 10.1177/0273475304273459 · doi:10.1177/0273475304273459
- 10.1177/027347539701900204 · doi:10.1177/027347539701900204
- 10.1177/027347539601800203 · doi:10.1177/027347539601800203
- 10.1080/08832320309598613 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01806.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0273475301232005 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167296222003 · DOI
- 10.1177/027347538901100308 · doi:10.1177/027347538901100308
- Cohen, S.G. (1994). Designing effective self-managing work teams. Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Theories of self-managing work teams (Vol. 1., pp. 67-102). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
- 10.1177/001872679504800603 · DOI
- 10.1177/027347538100300114 · doi:10.1177/027347538100300114
- 10.1177/027347539802000202 · DOI
- 10.1177/0273475302242004 · DOI
- Dixon, A.L., 2003, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 23, 205
- 10.1177/0273475307302019 · DOI
- 10.1177/108056990106400412 · DOI
- 10.1177/105256290202600404 · DOI
- 10.1177/104687818001100405 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0036204 · DOI
- 10.2307/2392936 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/027347538500700310 · doi:10.1177/027347538500700310
- 10.1177/0273475302241004 · DOI
- 10.1177/027347538100300203 · doi:10.1177/027347538100300203
- Johnson, D.W., 1991, Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom
- 10.1080/0260293042000227272 · doi:10.1080/0260293042000227272
- 10.3200/CTCH.53.2.57-61 · DOI
- Kulik, J.A., 1979, College teaching. Research on teaching: Concepts, findings and implications
- 10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/105256299501900113 · doi:10.1177/105256299501900113
- Mahenthiran, S., 2000, International Journal of Educational Management, 14, 255
- 10.1177/0273475399212004 · DOI · Paper page
- Myers, D.G., 1990, Social psychology
- 10.1080/08832320309599708 · DOI
- 10.1177/0273475302250571 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3102/00346543065002129 · doi:10.3102/00346543065002129 · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.699 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.699 · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4899-3650-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/106689299264990 · doi:10.1080/106689299264990
- 10.1177/027347539001200208 · DOI
- Taylor, T.E., 1976, Journal of College Science Teaching, 320
- 10.1037/h0047169 · DOI · Paper page
- Treisman, P.U., 1985, PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 1
- 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00619.x · DOI
- 10.1177/108056990106400413 · DOI
- 10.2307/256731 · DOI · Paper page
- Wales, C.E., 1978, The guided design approach
- 10.1080/00405849709543770 · DOI
- 10.1177/027347539101300208 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781483328218 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Eddy, S. L., Converse, M., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2015) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.14-06-0095 · Cited by 182
The Role of Communication and Cohesion in Reducing Social Loafing in Group Projects
Lam, C. (2015) · Business and Professional Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/2329490615596417 · Cited by 68
Peñarroja, V., Orengo, V., & Zornoza, A. (2017) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12449 · Cited by 47
Exploring antecedents of social loafing in students’ group work: A mixed-methods approach
Luo, Z., Marnburg, E., Øgaard, T., & Okumus, F. (2021) · Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education · doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100314 · Cited by 32
Azad, A., Kovanovic, V., Korolkiewicz, M., Zamecnik, A., Joksimovic, S., & Cukurova, M. (2026) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102268 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Aggarwal, P., & O'Brien, C. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-05-19
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 255-264
- ISSN
- 0273-4753 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6550
- OpenAlex
- W2140236135
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
