Cited by 11

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unfamiliar Face Matching With Driving Licence and Passport Photographs

Kramer, Robin S. S., Mohamed, Sophie, Hardy, Sarah C.·2019·Perception

Abstract

Matching two different images of an unfamiliar face is difficult, although we rely on this process every day when proving our identity. Although previous work with laboratory photosets has shown that performance is error-prone, few studies have focussed on how accurately people carry out this matching task using photographs taken from official forms of identification. In Experiment 1, participants matched high-resolution, colour face photos with current UK driving licence photos of the same group of people in a sorting task. Averaging 19 mistaken pairings out of 30, our results showed that this task was both difficult and error-prone. In Experiment 2, high-resolution photographs were paired with either driving licence or passport photographs in a typical pairwise matching paradigm. We found no difference in performance levels for the two types of ID image, with both producing unacceptable levels of accuracy (around 75%–79% correct). The current work benefits from increased ecological validity and provides a clear demonstration that these forms of official identification are ineffective and alternatives should be considered.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0301006619826495

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Facial comparison accuracy and data quality are directly correlated.

    “Facial comparison accuracy and data quality are, thus, directly correlated [95,96], especially in terms of individual accuracy variation across multiple analysts [97] and individual analyst ability overestimation [98].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1002/acp.2970 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/a0021893 · DOI
  3. 10.1371/journal.pone.0148148 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.339 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.3758/BRM.42.1.286 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1068/p5789 · DOI
  7. 10.1068/i0669 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/bjop.12260 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.patrec.2015.12.013 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199706)11:3<211::AID-ACP430>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  11. 10.1002/acp.3261 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/acp.3281 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1068/p6385 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.3758/BF03193433 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1002/acp.2965 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1080/17470218.2011.575228 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1080/13506285.2013.832451 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.001 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.109 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/bjop.12141 · DOI
  22. 10.1037/xap0000114 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kramer, R. S. S., Mohamed, S., & Hardy, S. C.
Affiliations
  • School of Psychology, University of Lincoln, UK
  • School of Psychology/Lincoln Institute for Health, University of Lincoln, UK
Venue
Perception
Published
2019-02
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
175-184
ISSN
  • 0301-0066
  • 1468-4233
Cited by
11
References
2
Language
en
Funders
experimental psychology society (Small Grant)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review