Cited by 53Children's Physical and Motor DevelopmentOccupational Therapy Practice and ResearchCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using an innovative model of service delivery to identify children who are struggling in school

Open access

Abstract

Introduction: School-age children with motor coordination challenges typically require formal referral for occupational therapy services and often experience lengthy wait times for one-to-one intervention. In a new service delivery model called Partnering for Change, therapists work collaboratively with educators in classrooms to observe, identify, and support children. This study describes children identified through a traditional referral process and compares them with children identified by occupational therapists through classroom observation and dynamic performance analysis. Methods: Participants included 246 children enrolled in a 2-year evaluative study of the Partnering for Change service delivery. Parents completed a demographic questionnaire, the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire, and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Children’s educators completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the School Function Assessment. Children completed the Movement Assessment Battery for Children. Results: Children identified were significantly younger and more likely to be girls than those referred under the traditional model. Using observation and dynamic performance analysis, occupational therapists identified children who had equally marked difficulties as those who came from the waitlist. In the Partnering for Change model, waitlists for service were eliminated for all children. Conclusions: Occupational therapists can identify children who are experiencing significant challenges participating at school without the need for standardized assessment, formal referrals, and waitlists.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0308022616679852

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Deloitte & Touche LLP (2010) Review of school health support services: Final report. Report for the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, 10 July.
  2. IBM Corp, 2013, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 [Software]
  3. ISD Scotland, 2012, Findings from the AHP waiting times census in Scotland
  4. Missiuna C, 2015, Occupation Therapy Now, 17, 13
  5. Polatajko HJ, 2004, Enabling Occupation in Children: The Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) Approach, 60

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Missiuna, C., Pollock, N., Campbell, W., DeCola, C., Hecimovich, C., Sahagian Whalen, S., Siemon, J., Song, K., Gaines, R., Bennett, S., McCauley, D., Stewart, D., Cairney, J., Dix, L., & Camden, C.
Affiliations
  • CanChild Centre for Childhood-onset Disability Research (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Managing Associate with REACH Therapy Services, Canada
  • Hamilton Health Sciences (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Brock University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Corresponding author
Missiuna, Cheryl
Venue
British Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2016-12-23
Volume
80
Issue
3
Pages
145-154
ISSN
  • 0308-0226 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-6006
OpenAlex
W2575437281
Cited by
38
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • Knowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Keywords
service delivery models, developmental coordination disorder, motor coordination deficits, elementary school students, occupational therapy referral, classroom observation, dynamic performance analysis, school participation, waiting lists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review