Cited by 83Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyDigital Media and Philosophy

Screenomics: a new approach for observing and studying individuals’ digital lives.

Open access
Ram, Nilam, Yang, Xiao, Cho, Mu-Jung, Brinberg, Miriam, Muirhead, Fiona, Reeves, Byron, Robinson, Thomas N.·2020·Journal of Adolescent Research

Abstract

AIMS: - for capturing, visualizing, and analyzing screenomes, the record of individuals' day-to-day digital experiences. SAMPLE: Over 500,000 smartphone screenshots provided by four Latino/Hispanic youth, age 14-15 years, from low-income, racial/ethnic minority neighborhoods. METHOD: Screenomes collected from smartphones for one to three months, as sequences of smartphone screenshots obtained every five seconds that the device is activated, are analyzed using computational machinery for processing images and text, machine learning algorithms, human-labeling, and qualitative inquiry. FINDINGS: Adolescents' digital lives differ substantially across persons, days, hours, and minutes. Screenomes highlight the extent of switching among multiple applications, and how each adolescent is exposed to different content at different times for different durations - with apps, food-related content, and sentiment as illustrative examples. IMPLICATIONS: We propose that the screenome provides the fine granularity of data needed to study individuals' digital lives, for testing existing theories about media use, and for generation of new theory about the interplay between digital media and development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0743558419883362

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only 2 previous studies appear to have used within-person analyses and objective measures (smartphone trackers) to examine how screens are associated with youth sleep.

    “Only 2 previous studies appear to have used within-person analyses and objective measures (smartphone trackers) to examine how screens are associated with youth sleep.19,21”

    From Screen Use at Bedtime and Sleep Duration and Quality Among Youths (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Method and Results sections describe objective, repeated smartphone tracking of four adolescents and analyses of each adolescent’s patterns of use. They do not report measuring sleep or analyzing an association between screen use and sleep. The source therefore fits the tracking aspect of the citation, but not its description as a study of youth sleep; it also does not establish the count of two previous studies. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The limited existing research in this area has reported few associations between device use before bed and subsequent sleep, although screen use was measured objectively in just 1 study (smartphones only).

    “The limited existing research in this area has reported few associations between device use before bed and subsequent sleep,19,20,21 although screen use was measured objectively in just 1 study (smartphones only).19”

    From Screen Use at Bedtime and Sleep Duration and Quality Among Youths (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Results (Fast Time-scale Patterning of Use; page unavailable) show that this study objectively recorded smartphone screen activity. The passages do not report associations between device use before bed and subsequent sleep, or establish that this was the only study to measure screen use objectively. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These 2 previous studies reported no significant reduction in total sleep time associated with before-bedtime smartphone use in youths but did not examine devices other than Android smartphones or the shut-eye latency period.

    “They also reported no significant reduction in total sleep time associated with before-bedtime smartphone use in youths but did not examine devices other than Android smartphones or the shut-eye latency period.”

    From Screen Use at Bedtime and Sleep Duration and Quality Among Youths (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Results sections describe four adolescents’ smartphone use and its timing, but do not report sleep outcomes. Searches for total sleep time, before-bedtime use, Android devices, and shut-eye latency found no passage addressing the claimed findings or limitations. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Azjen I (1985). Action-control: From cognition to behavior. New York: Springer.
  2. Bronfenbrenner U, & Morris PA (2006). The bioecological model of human development In Lerner RM (Ed.), Theoretical models of human development. Volume 1 of the Handbook of child psychology (6th ed, pp. 793– 828). Editors-in-Chief: Damon W & Lerner RM. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  3. Glaser BG (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  4. Ko M, Choi S, Yang S, Lee J, & Lee U (2015, 9). FamiLync: facilitating participatory parental mediation of adolescents’ smartphone use. In Proceedings of the 2075 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 867– 878). ACM.
  5. Liaw A & Wiener M (2002). Classification and Regression by randomForest. R News, 2(3), 18– 22.
  6. McCormick CM, Kuo SI-C, & Masten AS (2011). Developmental tasks across the lifespan In Fingerman KF, Smith J, & Antonucci TC (Eds.), Handbook of lifespan development (pp. 117– 140). Ney York: Springer.
  7. Mitkov R (Ed.). (2004). The Oxford handbook of computational linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. Ram N, & Reeves B (2018). Time sampling In Bornstein MH, Arterberry ME, Fingerman KL, & Lansford JE (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Lifespan Human Development (pp. 22472248). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  9. Reeves B, Yeykelis L, & Cummings JJ (2016). The use of media in media psychology. Media Psychology, 19(1), 49– 71.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ram, N., Yang, X., Cho, M.-J., Brinberg, M., Muirhead, F., Reeves, B., & Robinson, T. N.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Research
Published
2019-11-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
16-50
ISSN
  • 0743-5584 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6895
OpenAlex
W2986651361
Cited by
83
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6
FWCI
11.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (T32 AG049676)
  • national institutes of health (UL1 TR002014)
  • stanford university
  • Stanford Child Health Research Institute
  • Stanford University PHIND Center
  • john s. and james l. knight foundation (G-2017-54227)
  • national science foundation
  • social science research institute, pennsylvania state university
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
adolescents, low-income communities, racial and ethnic minority youth, media use, sentiment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review