Cited by 174Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Concurrent and Subsequent Associations Between Daily Digital Technology Use and High-Risk Adolescents’ Mental Health Symptoms

Open access
George, Madeleine J, Russell, Michael A, Piontak, Joy R, Odgers, Candice L·2018·Child Development

Abstract

Abstract Adolescents are spending an unprecedented amount of time using digital technologies (especially mobile technologies), and there are concerns that adolescents’ constant connectivity is associated with poor mental health, particularly among at-risk adolescents. Participants included 151 adolescents at risk for mental health problems (Mage = 13.1) who completed a baseline assessment, 30-day ecological momentary assessment, and 18 month follow-up assessment. Results from multilevel regression models showed that daily reports of both time spent using digital technologies and the number of text messages sent were associated with increased same-day attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and conduct disorder (CD) symptoms. Adolescents’ reported digital technology usage and text messaging across the ecological momentary assessment (EMA) period was also associated with poorer self-regulation and increases in conduct problem symptoms between the baseline and follow-up assessments. The title for this Special Section is Contemporary Mobile Technology and Child and Adolescent Development, edited by Zheng Yan and Lennart Hardell

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdev.12819

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In earlier periods, greater time spent online among adolescents was associated with more self-reported depression and anxiety symptoms.

    “Historically, adolescents who spent more time online were also more likely to report symptoms of depression and anxiety.”

    From Annual Research Review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears, and future directions. (2020) · cites this paper as George, Russell, Piontak, & Odgers, 2018

    The paper’s background section reports that earlier studies associated more time online with greater self-reported depressive symptoms among adolescents. Its Discussion also describes older research linking time online to depressive and broader internalizing symptoms, but our copy does not specifically establish the claimed historical association with anxiety symptoms. The paper’s own findings in high-risk adolescents instead found slightly fewer same-day anxiety symptoms with more time online. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In that prior at-risk adolescent sample, small same-day associations with increased externalizing problems were also observed.

    “although small same day linkages with increased externalizing problems were also observed”
  • In that prior at-risk adolescent sample, more texts sent were associated with less same-day depression.

    “more texts sent were also associated with less same day depression”
  • In prior research with adolescents at risk for substance use and externalizing problems, more time online, more texting, and a greater number of texts sent were associated with less same-day anxiety.

    “more time spent online, texting, and a greater number of texts sent were associated with less same day anxiety”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
George, M. J., Russell, M. A., Piontak, J. R., & Odgers, C. L.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Odgers, Candice L
Venue
Child Development
Published
2018-01-01
Volume
89
Issue
1
Pages
78-88
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2611804237
Cited by
174
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
33.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • William T. Grant Foundation
  • Verizon Foundation
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32 DA017629, P50 DA010075, P50 DA039838)
  • Jacobs Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
digital technology use, mobile technology, at-risk youth, psychiatric symptoms, ADHD symptoms, text messaging, self-regulation, adolescent mental health, ecological momentary assessment
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Ecological Momentary Assessment, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Computers, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Risk, Conduct Disorder, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review