Cited by 17Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyMuscle metabolism and nutritionNutrition and Health in Aging

Will We Ever Agree on Protein Requirements in the Intensive Care Unit?

Open access
Hoffer, L. John, Dickerson, Roland N., Martindale, Robert G., McClave, Stephen A., Ochoa Gautier, Juan B.·2017·Nutrition in Clinical Practice

Abstract

The precise value of the normal adult protein requirement has long been debated. For many reasons—one of them being the difficulty of carrying out long‐term nutrition experiments in free‐living people—uncertainty is likely to persist indefinitely. By contrast, the controlled environment of the intensive care unit and relatively short trajectory of many critical illnesses make it feasible to use hard clinical outcome trials to determine protein requirements for critically ill patients in well‐defined clinical situations. This article suggests how the physiological principles that underlie our understanding of normal protein requirements can be incorporated into the design of such clinical trials. The main focus is on 3 principles: (1) the rate of body nitrogen loss roughly predicts an individual's minimum protein requirement and is thus essential to measure to identify individual patients and clinical situations in which the minimum protein requirement is importantly increased, (2) existing muscle mass sets an upper limit on the rate at which amino acids can be mobilized from muscle for transfer to central proteins and sites of injury and is thus important to monitor to identify patients who are at greatest risk of protein deficiency–related adverse outcomes, and (3) negative energy balance increases the dietary protein requirement, so calorie‐deprived patients—whether obese or not—should be enrolled in hard clinical outcome trials that compare the current practice of “permissive underfeeding” (underprovision of all nutrients, including protein) with hypocaloric nutrition supplemented by a suitably generous amount of protein.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0884533617694613

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some other studies addressing supplemental PN did not show similar findings to the EPaNIC study.

    “Some of the other studies addressing supplemental PN (128, 154, 155) did not show similar findings to the EPaNIC study.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoffer, L. J., Dickerson, R. N., Martindale, R. G., McClave, S. A., & Ochoa Gautier, J. B.
Affiliations
  • Jewish General Hospital (CA)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
Hoffer, L. John
Venue
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03
Volume
32
Issue
1S
Pages
94S-100S
ISSN
  • 0884-5336 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2452
OpenAlex
W2592669004
Cited by
17
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
protein requirements, critically ill patients, intensive care nutrition, nitrogen balance, muscle mass, protein deficiency, negative energy balance, permissive underfeeding, hypocaloric diet, clinical trial design, amino acid mobilization
MeSH terms
Adult, Amino Acids, Dietary Proteins, Energy Metabolism, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Nutritional Requirements, Nutritional Status, Critical Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review