Cited by 335Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Help-Seeking Behaviors and Reasons for Help Seeking Reported by a Representative Sample of Women Victims of Intimate Partner Violence in New Zealand

Fanslow, Janet L., Robinson, Elizabeth M.·2010·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

Efforts to understand and support the process of help seeking by victims of intimate partner violence are of considerable urgency if we are to design systems and responses that are capable of actively and appropriately meeting the needs of victims. Using data from the New Zealand Violence Against Women Study, which drew from a representative general population sample of women aged 18 to 64 years, the authors report on the help-seeking behaviors of the women who had ever in their lifetime experienced physical and/or sexual violence by an intimate partner ( n = 956). More than 75% of respondents reported that they had told someone about the violence, indicating that it is not necessarily a “secret and private” problem. However, more than 40% of women indicated that no one had helped them. Informal sources of support (family and friends) were most frequently told about the violence but not all provided helpful responses. Fewer women told formal sources of help such as police, health care providers, and not all provided helpful responses. Women’s reasons for seeking help and for leaving violent relationships were similar and included “could not endure more,” being badly injured, fear or threat of death, and concern for children. Women’s reasons for staying in or returning to violent relationships included perception of the violence as “normal/not serious,” her emotional investment in the relationship, or staying for the sake of the children. The findings suggest that broader community outreach is required to ensure that family and friends are able to provide appropriate support for women in abusive relationships who are seeking help. Continued improvement in institutional responses is also required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260509336963

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fanslow, J. L., & Robinson, E. M.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Fanslow, Janet L.
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2009-07-13
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
929-951
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W2071800020
Cited by
335
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
help-seeking, intimate partner violence, women victims of violence, reasons for staying in abusive relationships, informal support, family and friends, community outreach, New Zealand
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, New Zealand, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Disclosure, Social Environment, Social Support, Spouse Abuse, Women's Health, Battered Women, Crime Victims, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review