Cited by 32LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender, Feminism, and MediaImpact of Technology on Adolescents

A first investigation into gender minority adolescents’ sexting experiences

Open access
Van Ouytsel, Joris, Walrave, Michel, De Marez, Lieven, Vanhaelewyn, Bart, Ponnet, Koen·2020·Journal of Adolescence

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Gender minority adolescents, such as transgender, gender nonconforming, gender diverse and non-binary youth, may face unique challenges with regard to online sexual communication. They may be especially vulnerable for sexting-related risks. The aim of this study is to explore the sexting experiences of gender minority youth among a school-based sample. METHODS: This brief exploratory study reports on a survey that was conducted among 1293 respondents with an average age of 14.79 years old (SD = 1.97) in the Dutch-speaking area of Belgium, and compares engagement in sexting experiences between cisgender and gender minority youth. RESULTS: The results of our exploratory study show that gender minority adolescents were more likely to have ever been pressured to send a sexting image. There were no significant differences with regard to receiving sexts, or receiving forwarded sexts. None of the gender minority youth reported that they had forwarded a sexting image from someone else, as opposed to 9.3% of cisgender youth who had forwarded a sext. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the explorative nature of our study, the results suggest that gender minority youth may be at an increased risk to experience sexting-related pressure. Additional research is needed to investigate the sexting experiences of gender minority adolescents. Gender minority youth may benefit from education about safer sexting, and specifically ways to cope with sexting-related pressure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.09.007

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., De Marez, L., Vanhaelewyn, B., & Ponnet, K.
Affiliations
  • Department of Communication Studies MIOS University of Antwerp Sint‐Jacobsstraat 2 2000 Antwerp Belgium
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Department of Communication Studies IMEC‐MICT‐Ghent University Ghent Belgium
  • Ghent University (BE)
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-09-29
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
213-218
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W3091238350
Cited by
32
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Research Foundation - Flanders (12J8719N)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
sexting, transgender youth, gender nonconforming youth, non-binary youth, cisgender youth, school-based adolescents
MeSH terms
Peer Influence, Sexual and Gender Minorities, Adolescent, Belgium, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review