Cited by 1,344Cultural Differences and ValuesCategorization, perception, and languageEmotions and Moral Behavior

Culture and the categorization of emotions.

Russell, James A.·1991·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Some writers assume--and others deny--that all human beings distinguish emotions from nonemotions and divide the emotions into happiness, anger, fear, and so on. A review of ethnographic and cross-cultural studies on (a) emotion lexicons, (b) the emotions inferred from facial expressions, and (c) dimensions implicit in comparative judgments of emotions indicated both similarities and differences in how the emotions are categorized in different languages and cultures. Five hypotheses are reviewed: (a) Basic categories of emotion are pancultural, subordinate categories culture specific; (b) emotional focal points are pancultural, boundaries culture specific; (c) emotion categories evolved from a single primitive category of physiological arousal; (d) most emotion categories are culture specific but can be defined by pancultural semantic primitives; and (e) an emotion category is a script with both culture-specific and pancultural components.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.426

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It makes no sense to elevate categories for anger, sadness, fear, disgust and happiness to a common ethological framework for comparing humans with other animals, when there is ample evidence from linguistics, anthropology and psychology that these categories do not offer a robust, universal framework for comparing humans of different cultures.

    “Furthermore, it makes no sense to elevate categories for anger, sadness, fear, disgust and happiness to a common ethological framework for comparing humans with other animals, when there is ample evidence from linguistics, anthropology and psychology that these categories do not offer a robust, universal framework for comparing humans of different cultures (Russell, 1991; Gendron et al., 2014a,b,”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russell, J. A.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Russell, James A.
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1991
Volume
110
Issue
3
Pages
426-450
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2113022628
Cited by
1,344
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 117 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 137 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 33
FWCI
18.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
emotion classification, cross-cultural comparison, emotion lexicon, facial expressions, affective domain, evolutionary origins of emotion, physiological arousal, semantic primitives
MeSH terms
Cross-Cultural Comparison, Emotions, Facial Expression, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Nonverbal Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review