Cited by 73Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsVasculitis and related conditions

Persistent triple antiphospholipid antibody positivity as a strong risk factor of first thrombosis, in a long‐term follow‐up study of patients without history of thrombosis or obstetrical morbidity

Yelnik, C M, Urbanski, G, Drumez, E, Sobanski, V, Maillard, H, Lanteri, A, Morell-Dubois, S, Caron, C +6 more·2017·Lupus

Abstract

Introduction The long-term risk of first thrombosis and benefit of prophylaxis in antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) carriers without history of thrombosis or obstetrical morbidity is poorly known. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term rate and risk factors associated with a first thrombosis in those patients. Patients and methods After a prior study ended in December 2005 and was already published, we extended the follow-up period of our cohort of aPL carriers. Results Ninety-eight of the 103 patients of the previous study were included. The annual first thrombosis rate was 2.3% per patient-year during a median of 13 years (6-17). None of the baseline characteristics was predictive of risk of first thrombosis, but persistent aPL over time were associated with an increased risk. The stronger association was found in triple aPL-positive carriers: OR 3.38 (95% CI: 1.24-9.22). Of note, conversely to our previous findings, no benefit of aspirin prophylaxis was observed. Conclusion The risk of first thrombosis in aPL carriers without history of thrombosis or obstetrical morbidity was significant, persisted linearly over time and was associated with persistent aPL. This risk was especially increased in triple aPL-positive carriers, in whom a close follow-up seems to be necessary. Nevertheless, the benefit of aspirin prophylaxis remained unclear.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0961203316657433

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yelnik, C. M., Urbanski, G., Drumez, E., Sobanski, V, Maillard, H., Lanteri, A., Morell-Dubois, S., Caron, C., Dubucquoi, S., Launay, D., Duhamel, A., Hachulla, E., Hatron, P. Y., & Lambert, M.
Affiliations
  • Université de Lille (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
  • Département de biostatistiques, EA2694, Université Lille 2, CHRU Lille, France
  • Université Lille 2, UFR Médecine, Lille, France
Corresponding author
Lambert, M
Venue
Lupus
Published
2016-07-20
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
163-169
ISSN
  • 0961-2033 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0962
OpenAlex
W2489967110
Cited by
73
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lupus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
Keywords
antiphospholipid antibodies, thrombosis risk factors, long-term follow-up, aspirin prophylaxis, antiphospholipid syndrome, thrombosis incidence
MeSH terms
Adult, Aspirin, Female, Fibrinolytic Agents, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Thrombosis, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Multivariate Analysis, Chi-Square Distribution, Linear Models, Proportional Hazards Models, Odds Ratio, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Treatment Outcome, Antibodies, Antiphospholipid, Disease-Free Survival, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review