The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis: Intolerance Among Both Liberals and Conservatives
Abstract
Decades of research in social and political psychology have demonstrated that political conservatives appear more intolerant toward a variety of groups than do political liberals. Recent work from our three independent labs has challenged this conventional wisdom by suggesting that some of the psychological underpinnings of intolerance are not exclusive to people on either end of the political spectrum. These studies have demonstrated that liberals and conservatives express similar levels of intolerance toward ideologically dissimilar and threatening groups. We suggest directions for future research and discuss the psychological and political implications of our conclusions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“by challenging official narratives conspiracy theories can actually undermine people's trust in broader societal structures [cf.56] leading to alienation and anomie [10-12, 57, 58] which in turn is linked to non-normative political activism [17**,18].”
From The dark side of social movements: social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories (2020) · cites this paper as [57]
Citations
Cites
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · cited 9×
“…indicated that conservatives may have cognitive styles and personality traits (e.g., higher need for closure; lower openness to experience) that may make them more likely to engage in motivated information processing (e.g., Jost et al., 2003), this is not necessarily the case (e.g., Kahan, 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialLiberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015141 · Cited by 4,560
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x · Cited by 4,344
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10000968 · Cited by 2,254
Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions
Bartels, L. M. (2002) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1021226224601 · Cited by 1,468
Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection
Kahan, D. M. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005271 · Cited by 1,302
(2023) · Review of Religious Research · doi:10.1007/13644.2211-4866 · Cited by 1,160
Personality and Prejudice: A Meta-Analysis and Theoretical Review
Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. H. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868308319226 · Cited by 1,130
Moral Conviction: Another Contributor to Attitude Strength or Something More?
Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Sargis, E. G. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895 · Cited by 828
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Crawford J. T., Xhambazi E. (in press). Predicting political biases against the Occupy Wall Street and Tea Party movements. Political Psychology.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 433
Rifat, M. R., Ayad, R., Asha, A. Z., Huang, B., Okman, S., Sabie, D., Ferdous, H. S., Soden, R., & Ahmed, S. I. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642821 · Cited by 12
Causal Illusions in the Service of Political Attitudes in Spain and the United Kingdom
Blanco, F., Fortes, B. G., & Matute, H. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01033 · Cited by 11
Baumgartner, J. N., & Morgan, G. S. (2019) · Studia Psychologica · doi:10.21909/sp.2019.01.770 · Cited by 12
Political ideology and moral dilemmas in public good provision
Hoenig, L. C., Pliskin, R., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29512-0 · Cited by 12
Ideological asymmetries in online hostility, intimidation, obscenity, and prejudice
Badaan, V., Hoffarth, M. R., Roper, C., Parker, T., & Jost, J. T. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-46574-2 · Cited by 15
Pathogen disgust requires no defense: a response to Shook, Terrizzi, Clay, & Oosterhoff (2015)
Tybur, J. M., Inbar, Y., Güler, E., & Molho, C. (2015) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.06.004 · Cited by 12
Equalitarianism: A Source of Liberal BiasPreprint
Winegard, B., Clark, C., & Hasty, C. R. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3175680 · Cited by 12
Measuring extremist archetypes: Scale development and validation
Obaidi, M., Skaar, S. W., Ozer, S., & Kunst, J. R. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0270225 · Cited by 11
Hill, T. D., Garcia-Alexander, G., Davis, A. P., Bjorklund, E. T., Vila‐Henninger, L. A., & Cockerham, W. C. (2022) · Discover Social Science and Health · doi:10.1007/s44155-022-00014-0 · Cited by 11
Sklenar, A. M., Frankenstein, A. N., Levy, P. U., & Leshikar, E. D. (2022) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2022.2130179 · Cited by 11
Sociopolitical Values as the Deep Culture in Culturally-Competent Psychotherapy
Redding, R. E., & Cobb, C. L. (2023) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026221126688 · Cited by 14
Ideology and intergroup inequality: emerging directions and trends
Kay, A. C., & Brandt, M. J. (2016) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.07.007 · Cited by 11
Moralization and Intolerance of Ideological Outgroups
Brandt, M. J., Wetherell, G. A., & Crawford, J. T. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315644189-14 · Cited by 12
National Identity as Interethnic (De)mobilization: A Relational Approach
Vetik, R. (2019) · Ethnopolitics · doi:10.1080/17449057.2019.1613065 · Cited by 11
Omission and compromise: The sacredness of moral foundations in political groups in Italy
Battista, S. D., Pivetti, M., Vainio, A., & Berti, C. (2020) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.v16i1.1887 · Cited by 11
Sinclair, S., Nilsson, A., & Agerström, J. (2023) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.9855 · Cited by 10
Minority group favoritism in service encounters
Palmeira, M. M., & Sharifi, S. (2020) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-03-2019-0240 · Cited by 13
Moscato, G., Caricati, L., & Bonetti, C. (2020) · International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social · doi:10.1080/02134748.2020.1840756 · Cited by 10
Rasmussen, S. H. R., Bor, A., Osmundsen, M., & Petersen, M. B. (2023) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123423000042 · Cited by 17
Political ideology and belief change in the face of counterevidence
Kossowska, M., Czarnek, G., & Szwed, P. (2023) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2965 · Cited by 11
Cohen‐Chen, S., Lang, O., Ran, S., & Halperin, E. (2020) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12697 · Cited by 10
Habib, S., Adelman, L., Leidner, B., Pasha, S., & Sibii, R. (2019) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000385 · Cited by 10
Jost, J. T., & Kende, A. (2019) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.12631 · Cited by 13
Conceptual Creep as a Human (and Scientific) Goal
Brandt, M. J., & Proulx, T. (2016) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2016.1109577 · Cited by 11
Rieckhof, S., Sander, C., Speerforck, S., Prestin, E., Angermeyer, M. C., & Schomerus, G. (2021) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03427-4 · Cited by 12
Asymmetry in political polarization at multiple levels of bias
Kluge, A., Adler, E., Nir, L., Halperin, E., Sams, M. E., & Lévy, J. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12967 · Cited by 9
Roussos, G., & Dovidio, J. F. (2019) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12601 · Cited by 9
Toward an Integrated Psychological Model of Violent Extremism
Obaidi, M., Bergh, R., Ozer, S., & Sindermann, C. (2025) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2025.2478735 · Cited by 9
Brandmayr, F. (2021) · European Journal of Social Theory · doi:10.1177/1368431021990965 · Cited by 8
Perceived impacts of a viewpoint diversity law in Florida’s State Universities
Groton, D. B., Barsky, A. E., & Spadola, C. (2023) · Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management · doi:10.1080/1360080x.2023.2191071 · Cited by 8
Relation between College Students’ Conservatism and Negative Stereotypes about Social Groups
Beyer, S. (2020) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci9120224 · Cited by 8
Bai, H. (2022) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302221084850 · Cited by 12
Political Extremism and a Generalized Propensity to Discriminate Among Values
Rigoli, F. (2022) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12839 · Cited by 8
Zacher, H., & Rudolph, C. W. (2022) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12433 · Cited by 8
Similarity to the self influences memory for social targets
Sklenar, A. M., Pérez, J., McCurdy, M. P., Frankenstein, A. N., & Leshikar, E. D. (2023) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2023.2185207 · Cited by 8
Schafer, M. H. (2015) · Social Currents · doi:10.1177/2329496514558629 · Cited by 8
Political Orientation and Belief in Science in a U.S. College Sample
Medlin, M. M., Sacco, D. F., & Brown, M. (2019) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/0033294119889583 · Cited by 8
Are conservatives from Mars and liberals from Venus? Maybe not so much.
Skitka, L. J., & Washburn, A. N. (2016) · Cited by 8
Decety, J., Cohen, M. S., & Cao, Q. (2025) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.70109 · Cited by 9
Sinclair, S., Nilsson, A., & Agerström, J. (2022) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.8017 · Cited by 7
How politics constrain the public’s understanding of terrorism
Haner, M., Sloan, M. M., Pickett, J. T., Cullen, F. T., & O’Neill, V. (2022) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/soac132 · Cited by 8
Political Ideology and Attitudinal Ambivalence: Investigating the Role of Ideological Extremity
Burger, A. M. (2024) · Social Psychology and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506231222958 · Cited by 6
Caricati, L., & Rossi, F. (2024) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.2882 · Cited by 7
Mieriņa, I. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-59007-7_3 · Cited by 7
How I learned to stop fearing: Ideological differences in choice of reappraisal content
Cohen, R., Pliskin, R., & Halperin, E. (2018) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2527 · Cited by 7
Liberals Report Lower Levels of Attitudinal Ambivalence Than Conservatives
Newman, L. S., & Sargent, R. H. (2020) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620939798 · Cited by 7
Errmann, A., Seo, Y., & Septianto, F. (2022) · Journal of the Association for Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/719580 · Cited by 7
Coddled or Engaged? Teaching Political Tolerance to Generation Z Students
McBeth, M. K. (2022) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512169.2022.2097915 · Cited by 13
The relationship between political ideology and judgements of bias in distributional outcomes
Kim, J., & Zauberman, G. S. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01779-3 · Cited by 7
Motivated viewing: Selective exposure to political images when reasoning is not involved
Warren, C., Schneider, S. P., Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109704 · Cited by 8
The Evolutionary Basis of Political Ideology
Claessens, S., Chaudhuri, A., Sibley, C. G., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.003 · Cited by 9
Transforming Neoliberal Social Psychology Into An Emancipatory Science: A Call To Abolish The PolicePreprint
Gampa, A., & Sawyer, J. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4496927 · Cited by 7
How different types of environmentalists are perceived: changing perceptions by the feature
Kibele, K., Rosa, M., & Obaidi, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125617 · Cited by 5
Passini, S., & Villano, P. (2017) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/0033294117742656 · Cited by 6
Upenieks, L. (2022) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231221081641 · Cited by 4
Owuamalam, C. K., & Matos, A. S. (2018) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12351 · Cited by 6
Glasford, D. E. (2022) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12896 · Cited by 7
Ivanov, I., Müller, D., Delmas, F., & Wänke, M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.001 · Cited by 7
State and Religion in Israel: A Philosophical-Legal Inquiry
Sapir, G., & Statman, D. (2019) · Cited by 6
Political ideology and social categorization
Stern, C. (2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2021.11.003 · Cited by 7
Adelman, L., Verkuyten, M., Cárdenas, D., & Yogeeswaran, K. (2021) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104141 · Cited by 5
Development a Measurement of Attitudes about Ideal Government
Prusova, I. (2021) · Social Psychology and Society · doi:10.17759/sps.2021120308 · Cited by 5
Left-wing identity politics and authoritarian attitudes: a correlational study of social media users
Fasce, A., & Avendaño, D. (2023) · Journal of Political Ideologies · doi:10.1080/13569317.2023.2246914 · Cited by 5
Individuating information influences partisan judgments
Price‐Blackshear, M. A., Sheldon, K. M., Corcoran, M. J., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2019) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12595 · Cited by 5
Reiß, S., Klackl, J., Proulx, T., & Jonas, E. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220732 · Cited by 5
Blanchar, J. C., Alonzo, M., Ayoh, C., Blain, K., Espinoza, L., Estrada, M., Gillen, J., Marquez, A., Miao, J., Overbeck, V., et al. (2021) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000448 · Cited by 5
“Just a virus” or politicized virus? Global media reporting of China on COVID-19
Fan, X., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Chinese Sociological Review · doi:10.1080/21620555.2022.2116308 · Cited by 5
The effect of incentives on motivated numeracy amidst COVID-19
Chung, E., Govindan, P., & Pechenkina, A. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2022.32 · Cited by 5
Jussim, L. J., Crawford, J. T., Stevens, S. T., & Anglin, S. M. (2016) · Cited by 5
The Politics of Intergroup Attitudes
(2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.012 · Cited by 5
Political Identity Biases Americans’ Judgments of Outgroup EmotionPreprint
Basyouni, R., Harp, N. R., Haas, I. J., & Neta, M. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104392 · Cited by 7
You’re red, I’m blue, so I don’t like you: the political dis similarity- dis liking effect
Bruchmann, K., Baker, S., Adisu, M., & Zasso, S. A. (2023) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2023.2224760 · Cited by 4
Marx, P. (2025) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00104140251328038 · Cited by 5
The role of intergroup threats for explaining political bias in screening decisions
Hickman, L., & Yang, T. (2025) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.70026 · Cited by 4
Al-Amine, M., & Çakmak, H. (2025) · International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social · doi:10.1177/02134748251364108 · Cited by 5
The Unreasonable Destructiveness of Political Correctness in Philosophy
Doria, M. (2017) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies2030017 · Cited by 6
Fisher, E. L., & Talmage, C. A. (2019) · Community Development · doi:10.1080/15575330.2019.1677733 · Cited by 4
Interregional and intraregional variability of intergroup attitudes predict online hostility
Rosenbusch, H., Evans, A. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2020) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2301 · Cited by 7
Mallinas, S. R., & Conway, P. J. (2021) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2021.1916240 · Cited by 4
van Prooijen, J., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.029 · Cited by 4
Liebenow, H. A., Boucher, K. L., & Cassidy, B. S. (2022) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/03616843221104383 · Cited by 7
Impacts of Viewpoint Diversity Law on Teaching and Learning in Florida’s State Universities
Barsky, A. E., Groton, D. B., & Spadola, C. (2023) · Educational Policy · doi:10.1177/08959048231215485 · Cited by 4
Are political views and religiosity related to facial morphology? Evidence from a Turkish sample
Sarıbay, S. A., & Kleisner, K. (2017) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.035 · Cited by 4
The Nature and Consequences of Ideological Hegemony in American Political Science
Wilson, J. M. (2019) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096519000659 · Cited by 4
Užarević, F., & Saroglou, V. (2019) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2019.1696498 · Cited by 5
Yogeeswaran, K., Nash, K. A., Jia, H., Adelman, L., & Verkuyten, M. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-020-01290-2 · Cited by 4
Chan, L., McFarland, J. D., & Conway, L. G. (2018) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-018-0312-y · Cited by 5
Haas, I. J. (2020) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2020.1721234 · Cited by 4
Political Opposites Do Not Attract: The Effects of Ideological Dissimilarity on Impression FormationPreprint
Mallinas, S. R., Crawford, J. T., & Cole, S. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/p3j8v · Cited by 4
Hodge, D. R. (2021) · Spiritual Psychology and Counseling · doi:10.37898/spc.2021.6.3.154 · Cited by 3
Burns, M. D., Granz, E. L., & Williams, K. D. (2024) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302231219672 · Cited by 3
Ajayi, A. A. (2025) · Journal of Black Psychology · doi:10.1177/00957984251387222 · Cited by 3
Conservatism Negatively Predicts Creativity: A Study Across 28 Countries
Groyecka-Bernard, A., Sorokowski, P., Karwowski, M., Roberts, S. C., Aavik, T., Akello, G., Alm, C., Amjad, N., Asao, K., Atama, C. S., et al. (2024) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/00220221241238321 · Cited by 4
The effects of Muslim immigration and demographic change on group boundaries in Germany
Gereke, J., Helbling, M., Kommol, A., Szafran, D., Ünal, Z., & Visser-Koomson, M. (2025) · European Societies · doi:10.1162/euso_a_00038 · Cited by 4
Leveraging Linguistic Content and Debater Traits to Predict Debate Outcomes
Paxton, A., & Dale, R. A. C. (2014) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 3
Butt, S. M., Dahling, J. J., & Hansel, K. R. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.014 · Cited by 3
How Does Motivation Modulate the Operation of the Mentalizing Network in Person Evaluation?
Nugiel, T., & Beer, J. S. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01501 · Cited by 3
Using think-alouds to understand how students balance free speech and inclusion
Bernstein, J. L., & Armstrong, C. W. (2021) · First Amendment Studies · doi:10.1080/21689725.2021.1884113 · Cited by 3
Determinant factors of partisans’ confirmation bias in social media
Ardi, R., & Pradiri, A. P. (2021) · Humanitas Indonesian Psychological Journal · doi:10.26555/humanitas.v18i1.19664 · Cited by 3
Kemmelmeier, M., Nesbitt, I. S., & Erhart, R. S. (2021) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12246 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G.
- Affiliations
- Tilburg University (NL)
- DePaul University (US)
- Saint Louis University (US)
- The College of New Jersey (US)
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-34
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- OpenAlex
- W2146237990
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 93.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Universiteit van Tilburg
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Academic Freedom and Politics
- Keywords
- political intolerance, intergroup attitudes, political ideology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review