Cited by 433Social and Intergroup PsychologyPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentAcademic Freedom and Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis: Intolerance Among Both Liberals and Conservatives

Brandt, Mark J., Reyna, Christine, Chambers, John R., Crawford, Jarret T., Wetherell, Geoffrey·2014·Current Directions in Psychological Science

DOI 10.1177/0963721413510932

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Decades of research in social and political psychology have demonstrated that political conservatives appear more intolerant toward a variety of groups than do political liberals. Recent work from our three independent labs has challenged this conventional wisdom by suggesting that some of the psychological underpinnings of intolerance are not exclusive to people on either end of the political spectrum. These studies have demonstrated that liberals and conservatives express similar levels of intolerance toward ideologically dissimilar and threatening groups. We suggest directions for future research and discuss the psychological and political implications of our conclusions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721413510932

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · cited 9×
“…indicated that conservatives may have cognitive styles and personality traits (e.g., higher need for closure; lower openness to experience) that may make them more likely to engage in motivated information processing (e.g., Jost et al., 2003), this is not necessarily the case (e.g., Kahan, 2013).”
BackgroundInfluential
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015141 · Cited by 4,560
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x · Cited by 4,344
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10000968 · Cited by 2,254
Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions
Bartels, L. M. (2002) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1021226224601 · Cited by 1,468
Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection
Kahan, D. M. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005271 · Cited by 1,302
Review of Religious Research
(2023) · Review of Religious Research · doi:10.1007/13644.2211-4866 · Cited by 1,160
Personality and Prejudice: A Meta-Analysis and Theoretical Review
Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. H. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868308319226 · Cited by 1,130
Moral Conviction: Another Contributor to Attitude Strength or Something More?
Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Sargis, E. G. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895 · Cited by 828

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Crawford J. T., Xhambazi E. (in press). Predicting political biases against the Occupy Wall Street and Tea Party movements. Political Psychology.

Sorted by citations

Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology
Jost, J. T. (2017) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12407 · Cited by 764
Partisan Polarization Is the Primary Psychological Motivation behind Political Fake News Sharing on Twitter
OSMUNDSEN, M., BOR, A., VAHLSTRUP, P. B., BECHMANN, A., & PETERSEN, M. B. (2021) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055421000290 · Cited by 614
Political diversity will improve social psychological science
Duarte, J. L., Crawford, J. T., Stern, C., Haidt, J., Jussim, L. J., & Tetlock, P. E. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x14000430 · Cited by 604
Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another's opinions
Frimer, J. A., Skitka, L. J., & Motyl, M. S. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.003 · Cited by 383
At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and Conservatives
Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., Celniker, J. B., & Zinger, J. F. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617746796 · Cited by 535
Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries
Imhoff, R., Zimmer, F., Klein, O., António, J. H. C., Babińska, M., Bangerter, A., Bilewicz, M., Blanuša, N., Bovan, K., Bužarovska, R., et al. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01258-7 · Cited by 274
The Limits of Partisan Prejudice
Lelkes, Y., & Westwood, S. J. (2017) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/688223 · Cited by 311
The Politics of Fear: Is There an Ideological Asymmetry in Existential Motivation?
Jost, J. T., Stern, C., Rule, N. O., & Sterling, J. L. (2017) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.324 · Cited by 328
The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity
Hodson, G., & Dhont, K. (2015) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2015.1070018 · Cited by 244
You are fake news: political bias in perceptions of fake news
van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., & Roozenbeek, J. (2020) · Media, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443720906992 · Cited by 235
Psychological Features of Extreme Political Ideologies
van Prooijen, J., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2019) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721418817755 · Cited by 225
Science Denial Across the Political Divide: Liberals and Conservatives Are Similarly Motivated to Deny Attitude-Inconsistent Science
Washburn, A. N., & Skitka, L. J. (2017) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617731500 · Cited by 237
The dark side of social movements: social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories
Sternisko, A., Cichocka, A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.007 · Cited by 197
Tribalism Is Human Nature
Clark, C. J., Liu, B. S., Winegard, B. M., & Ditto, P. H. (2019) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721419862289 · Cited by 185
Are Liberals and Conservatives Equally Motivated to Feel Empathy Toward Others?
Hasson, Y., Tamir, M., Brahms, K. S., Cohrs, J. C., & Halperin, E. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218769867 · Cited by 185
The partisan mind: Is extreme political partisanship related to cognitive inflexibility?
Zmigrod, L., Rentfrow, P. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000661 · Cited by 172
False Equivalence: Are Liberals and Conservatives in the United States Equally Biased?
Baron, J., & Jost, J. T. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691618788876 · Cited by 213
Educationism and the irony of meritocracy: Negative attitudes of higher educated people towards the less educated
Kuppens, T., Spears, R., Manstead, A. S. R., Spruyt, B., & Easterbrook, M. J. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.001 · Cited by 164
Interventions to reduce partisan animosity
Hartman, R., Blakey, W., Womick, J., Bail, C., Finkel, E. J., Han, H., Sarrouf, J., Schroeder, J., Sheeran, P., Van Bavel, J. J., et al. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01442-3 · Cited by 171
People both high and low on religious fundamentalism are prejudiced toward dissimilar groups.
Brandt, M. J., & Tongeren, D. R. V. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000076 · Cited by 156
Hierarchy in the eye of the beholder: (Anti-)egalitarianism shapes perceived levels of social inequality.
Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J. A., & Ho, A. K. (2016) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000097 · Cited by 155
Social divides in the age of globalization
Helbling, M., & Jungkunz, S. (2019) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1674578 · Cited by 148
Identity concerns drive belief: The impact of partisan identity on the belief and dissemination of true and false news
Pereira, A., Harris, E., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302211030004 · Cited by 163
Fear Among the Extremes
van Prooijen, J., Krouwel, A. P. M., Boiten, M., & Eendebak, L. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215569706 · Cited by 145
Polarization in America: two possible futures
Heltzel, G., & Laurin, K. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.008 · Cited by 165
Extreme Political Beliefs Predict Dogmatic Intolerance
van Prooijen, J., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2016) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550616671403 · Cited by 148
From Attention to Action: The Influence of Cognitive and Ideological Diversity in Top Management Teams on Business Model Innovation
Narayan, S., Sidhu, J. S., & Volberda, H. (2020) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12668 · Cited by 141
Tribalism in War and Peace: The Nature and Evolution of Ideological Epistemology and Its Significance for Modern Social Science
Clark, C. J., & Winegard, B. M. (2020) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2020.1721233 · Cited by 128
The dual evolutionary foundations of political ideology
Claessens, S., Fischer, K., Chaudhuri, A., Sibley, C. G., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0850-9 · Cited by 133
Ideological symmetries and asymmetries in political intolerance and prejudice toward political activist groups
Crawford, J. T. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.08.002 · Cited by 132
Moral grandstanding in public discourse: Status-seeking motives as a potential explanatory mechanism in predicting conflict
Grubbs, J. B., Warmke, B., Tosi, J., James, A. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223749 · Cited by 118
Social and economic ideologies differentially predict prejudice across the political spectrum, but social issues are most divisive.
Crawford, J. T., Brandt, M. J., Inbar, Y., Chambers, J. R., & Motyl, M. S. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000074 · Cited by 122
Bounded openness: The effect of openness to experience on intolerance is moderated by target group conventionality.
Brandt, M., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J., Wetherell, G., & Reyna, C. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000055 · Cited by 94
Are Conservatives Really More Simple‐Minded than Liberals? The Domain Specificity of Complex Thinking
Conway, L. G., Gornick, L. J., Houck, S. C., Anderson, C., Stockert, J., Sessoms, D., & McCue, K. (2015) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12304 · Cited by 116
Worldview conflict and prejudice
Brandt, M. J., & Crawford, J. T. (2019) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2019.09.002 · Cited by 125
Are Conservatives More Sensitive to Threat than Liberals? It Depends on How We Define Threat and Conservatism
Crawford, J. T. (2017) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.354 · Cited by 139
Political Conservatives’ Affinity for Obedience to Authority Is Loyal, Not Blind
Frimer, J. A., Gaucher, D. M., & Schaefer, N. K. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167214538672 · Cited by 117
Intergroup Toleration and Its Implications for Culturally Diverse Societies
Verkuyten, M., Yogeeswaran, K., & Adelman, L. (2018) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12051 · Cited by 110
Morally Reframed Arguments Can Affect Support for Political Candidates
Voelkel, J. G., & Feinberg, M. (2017) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617729408 · Cited by 114
Predicting Ideological Prejudice
Brandt, M. J. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617693004 · Cited by 113
A Psychology of Ideology: Unpacking the Psychological Structure of Ideological Thinking
Zmigrod, L. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211044140 · Cited by 135
The Political Domain Appears Simpler to the Politically Extreme Than to Political Moderates
Lammers, J., Koch, A. S., Conway, P. J., & Brandt, M. J. (2016) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550616678456 · Cited by 92
Curbing the Court
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316979754 · Cited by 90
Who Is Prejudiced, and Toward Whom? The Big Five Traits and Generalized Prejudice
Crawford, J. T., & Brandt, M. J. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219832335 · Cited by 88
The Montagu Principle: Incivility decreases politicians’ public approval, even with their political base.
Frimer, J. A., & Skitka, L. J. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000140 · Cited by 93
The Liberal and Conservative Experience Across Academic Disciplines
Honeycutt, N., & Freberg, L. A. (2016) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550616667617 · Cited by 89
The Social Psychology of Intergroup Toleration
Verkuyten, M., & Yogeeswaran, K. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868316640974 · Cited by 103
A comparison of political violence by left-wing, right-wing, and Islamist extremists in the United States and the world
Jaśko, K., Lafree, G. D., Piazza, J. A., & Becker, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2122593119 · Cited by 91
Groups' warmth is a personal matter: Understanding consensus on stereotype dimensions reconciles adversarial models of social evaluation
Koch, A. S., Imhoff, R., Unkelbach, C., Nicolás, G., Fiske, S. T., Terache, J., Carrier, A., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103995 · Cited by 94
More Polarized but More Independent
Twenge, J. M., Honeycutt, N., Prišlin, R., & Sherman, R. A. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167216660058 · Cited by 94
Interpretations and methods: Towards a more effectively self-correcting social psychology
Jussim, L. J., Crawford, J. T., Anglin, S. M., Stevens, S. T., & Duarte, J. L. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.003 · Cited by 84
(Anti-)egalitarianism differentially predicts empathy for members of advantaged versus disadvantaged groups.
Lucas, B. J., & Kteily, N. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000112 · Cited by 93
Moral polarization and out-party hostility in the US political context
Tappin, B. M., & McKay, R. T. (2019) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v7i1.1090 · Cited by 79
The need for intellectual diversity in psychological science: Our own studies of actively open-minded thinking as a case study
Stanovich, K. E., & Toplak, M. E. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.006 · Cited by 83
An Asymmetrical “President-in-Power” Effect
MORISI, D., JOST, J. T., & SINGH, V. (2019) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055418000850 · Cited by 73
A conflict within a conflict: intragroup ideological polarization and intergroup intractable conflict
Orian Harel, T., Maoz, I., & Halperin, E. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.11.013 · Cited by 71
Employee‐CSR Tensions: Drivers of Employee (Dis)Engagement with Contested CSR Initiatives
Hahn, T., Sharma, G., & Glavas, A. (2023) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12923 · Cited by 69
Ideological Responses to the EU Refugee Crisis
van Prooijen, J., Krouwel, A. P. M., & Emmer, J. (2017) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617731501 · Cited by 68
The Groupy Shift: Conformity to Liberal In-Group Norms as a Group-Based Response to Threatened Personal Control
Stollberg, J., Fritsche, I., & Jonas, E. (2017) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.374 · Cited by 66
Protest movements involving limited violence can sometimes be effective: Evidence from the 2020 BlackLivesMatter protests
Shuman, E., Hasan‐Aslih, S., van Zomeren, M., Saguy, T., & Halperin, E. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2118990119 · Cited by 65
People See Political Opponents as More Stupid Than Evil
Hartman, R., Hester, N., & Gray, K. J. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672221089451 · Cited by 66
Social Psychological Perspectives on Political Polarization: Insights and Implications for Climate Change
Cole, J. C., Gillis, A. J., van der Linden, S., Cohen, M. A., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2025) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231186409 · Cited by 61
A Model of Political Bias in Social Science Research
Honeycutt, N., & Jussim, L. J. (2020) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2020.1722600 · Cited by 64
The Problem with Morality: Impeding Progress and Increasing Divides
Kovacheff, C., Schwartz, S., Inbar, Y., & Feinberg, M. (2018) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12045 · Cited by 62
The Negative Implications of Being Tolerated: Tolerance From the Target’s Perspective
Verkuyten, M., Yogeeswaran, K., & Adelman, L. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619897974 · Cited by 70
Studying a Heterogeneous Array of Target Groups Can Help Us Understand Prejudice
Brandt, M. J., & Crawford, J. T. (2019) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721419830382 · Cited by 66
Ideological (A)symmetries in prejudice and intergroup bias
Crawford, J. T., & Brandt, M. J. (2019) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.11.007 · Cited by 57
QTIPs: Questionable theoretical and interpretive practices in social psychology
Brandt, M. J., & Proulx, T. (2015) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x14001149 · Cited by 54
Moral Polarization Predicts Support for Authoritarian and Progressive Strong Leaders via the Perceived Breakdown of Society
Crimston, C. R., Selvanathan, H. P., & Jetten, J. (2021) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12787 · Cited by 58
Moralization and the 2012 U.S. presidential election campaign
Brandt, M. J., Wisneski, D. C., & Skitka, L. J. (2015) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v3i2.434 · Cited by 56
Does Activism in Social Science Explain Conservatives’ Distrust of Scientists?
Cofnas, N., Carl, N., & Menie, M. A. W. O. (2017) · The American Sociologist · doi:10.1007/s12108-017-9362-0 · Cited by 60
Liberalism and Conservatism, for a Change! Rethinking the Association Between Political Orientation and Relation to Societal Change
Proch, J., Elad‐Strenger, J., & Kessler, T. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12559 · Cited by 57
A Uniform Conspiracy Mindset or Differentiated Reactions to Specific Conspiracy Beliefs? Evidence From Latent Profile Analyses
Frenken, M., & Imhoff, R. (2021) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.590 · Cited by 53
Ideological Fit Enhances Interpersonal Orientations
Chopik, W. J., & Motyl, M. S. (2016) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550616658096 · Cited by 53
Toleration and prejudice‐reduction: Two ways of improving intergroup relations
Verkuyten, M., Yogeeswaran, K., & Adelman, L. (2019) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2624 · Cited by 74
Right-Wing Ideology: Positive (andNegative) Relations to Threat
Choma, B. L., & Hodson, G. (2017) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.415 · Cited by 53
Ideological diversity, hostility, and discrimination in philosophy
Peters, U., Honeycutt, N., BLOCK, A. D., & Jussim, L. J. (2020) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2020.1743257 · Cited by 52
Partisan Bias and Its Discontents
Ditto, P. H., Clark, C. J., Liu, B. S., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., Celniker, J. B., & Zinger, J. F. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691618817753 · Cited by 51
The Effect of Ideological Identification on the Endorsement of Moral Values Depends on the Target Group
Voelkel, J. G., & Brandt, M. J. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218798822 · Cited by 57
The functional role of ventral anterior cingulate cortex in social evaluation: disentangling valence from subjectively rewarding opportunities
Rigney, A. E., Koski, J. E., & Beer, J. S. (2017) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsx132 · Cited by 47
Support for asymmetric violence among Arab populations: The clash of cultures, social identity, or counterdominance?
Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Levin, S., Pratto, F., & Obaidi, M. (2015) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430215577224 · Cited by 51
Conceptual, empirical, and practical problems with the claim that intolerance, prejudice, and discrimination are equivalent on the political left and right
Badaan, V., & Jost, J. T. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.007 · Cited by 46
Closing ranks: Ingroup norm conformity as a subtle response to threatening climate change
Barth, M., Masson, T., Fritsche, I., & Ziemer, C.-T. (2018) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430217733119 · Cited by 51
Authoritarianism
Duckitt, J. H. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.013 · Cited by 45
Political ideology shapes the amplification of the accomplishments of disadvantaged vs. advantaged group members
Kteily, N., Rocklage, M. D., McClanahan, K. J., & Ho, A. K. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1818545116 · Cited by 44
Speciesism, generalized prejudice, and perceptions of prejudiced others
Everett, J. A. C., Caviola, L., Savulescu, J., & Faber, N. S. (2019) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430218816962 · Cited by 45
A comparison of extreme religious and political ideologies: Similar worldviews but different grievances
van Prooijen, J., & Kuijper, S. M. H. C. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.109888 · Cited by 43
The Psychology of Intolerance: Unpacking Diverse Understandings of Intolerance
Verkuyten, M., Adelman, L., & Yogeeswaran, K. (2020) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721420924763 · Cited by 43
Empathy and the liberal-conservative political divide in the U.S.
Morris, S. G. (2020) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v8i1.1102 · Cited by 42
When and Why Is Religious Attendance Associated With Antigay Bias and Gay Rights Opposition? A Justification-Suppression Model Approach
Hoffarth, M., Hodson, G., & Molnar, D. S. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000146 · Cited by 38
Investigating the origins of political views: biases in explanation predict conservative attitudes in children and adults
Hussak, L. J., & Cimpian, A. (2017) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12567 · Cited by 47
Stigmatising attitudes towards people who inject drugs, and people living with blood borne viruses or sexually transmissible infections in a representative sample of the Australian population
Broady, T. R., Brener, L., Cama, E. J., Hopwood, M., & Treloar, C. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232218 · Cited by 41
The Realignment of Political Tolerance in the United States
Chong, D., Citrin, J., & Levy, M. E. (2022) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592722002079 · Cited by 41
Curbing the Court
Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2020) · Cited by 41
Partisan ideological attitudes: Liberals are tolerant; the intelligent are intolerant.
Ganzach, Y., & Schul, Y. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000324 · Cited by 40
Cultural threat perceptions predict violent extremism via need for cognitive closure
Obaidi, M., Anjum, G., Bierwiaczonek, K., Dovidio, J. F., Ozer, S., & Kunst, J. R. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2213874120 · Cited by 48
It may be harder than we thought, but political diversity will (still) improve social psychological science
Crawford, J. T., Duarte, J. L., Haidt, J., Jussim, L. J., Stern, C., & Tetlock, P. E. (2015) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x15000035 · Cited by 41
Extremism reduces conflict arousal and increases values affirmation in response to meaning violations
Sleegers, W. W. A., Proulx, T., & van Beest, I. (2015) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.03.012 · Cited by 39
Gender equality, value violations, and prejudice toward Muslims
Moss, A. J., Blodorn, A., Camp, A. R. V., & O’Brien, L. T. (2017) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430217716751 · Cited by 43
Political opposites do not attract: The effects of ideological dissimilarity on impression formation
Mallinas, S. R., Crawford, J. T., & Cole, S. (2018) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v6i1.747 · Cited by 39

Authors: Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G.
Affiliations: Tilburg University (NL)
DePaul University (US)
Saint Louis University (US)
The College of New Jersey (US)
ORCID: Brandt, Mark J.
Reyna, Christine
Crawford, Jarret T.
Wetherell, Geoffrey
Venue: Current Directions in Psychological Science
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Published: 2014-02
Volume: 23
Issue: 1
Pages: 27-34
ISSN: 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
1467-8721
DOI: 10.1177/0963721413510932
OpenAlex: W2146237990
Cited by: 432
References: 35
Citations by year: 2026: 24 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 6
FWCI: 93.37
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations: Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders: Universiteit van Tilburg
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Academic Freedom and Politics
Keywords: political intolerance, intergroup attitudes, political ideology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis: Intolerance Among Both Liberals and Conservatives

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks