Cited by 433Social and Intergroup PsychologyPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentAcademic Freedom and Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis: Intolerance Among Both Liberals and Conservatives

Brandt, Mark J., Reyna, Christine, Chambers, John R., Crawford, Jarret T., Wetherell, Geoffrey·2014·Current Directions in Psychological Science

DOI 10.1177/0963721413510932

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Decades of research in social and political psychology have demonstrated that political conservatives appear more intolerant toward a variety of groups than do political liberals. Recent work from our three independent labs has challenged this conventional wisdom by suggesting that some of the psychological underpinnings of intolerance are not exclusive to people on either end of the political spectrum. These studies have demonstrated that liberals and conservatives express similar levels of intolerance toward ideologically dissimilar and threatening groups. We suggest directions for future research and discuss the psychological and political implications of our conclusions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721413510932

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · cited 9×
“…indicated that conservatives may have cognitive styles and personality traits (e.g., higher need for closure; lower openness to experience) that may make them more likely to engage in motivated information processing (e.g., Jost et al., 2003), this is not necessarily the case (e.g., Kahan, 2013).”
BackgroundInfluential
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015141 · Cited by 4,560
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x · Cited by 4,344
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10000968 · Cited by 2,254
Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions
Bartels, L. M. (2002) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1021226224601 · Cited by 1,468
Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection
Kahan, D. M. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005271 · Cited by 1,302
Review of Religious Research
(2023) · Review of Religious Research · doi:10.1007/13644.2211-4866 · Cited by 1,160
Personality and Prejudice: A Meta-Analysis and Theoretical Review
Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. H. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868308319226 · Cited by 1,130
Moral Conviction: Another Contributor to Attitude Strength or Something More?
Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Sargis, E. G. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895 · Cited by 828

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Crawford J. T., Xhambazi E. (in press). Predicting political biases against the Occupy Wall Street and Tea Party movements. Political Psychology.

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 433

Strange Bedfellows: The Alliance Theory of Political Belief Systems
Pinsof, D., Sears, D. O., & Haselton, M. G. (2023) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2023.2274433 · Cited by 49
The Balanced Ideological Antipathy Model
Crawford, J. T., Mallinas, S. R., & Furman, B. J. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215603713 · Cited by 39
The moral dimension of politicized identity: Exploring identity content during the 2012 Presidential Elections in the USA
Turner-Zwinkels, F. M., van Zomeren, M., & Postmes, T. (2016) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12171 · Cited by 38
Individual Differences in the Resistance to Social Change and Acceptance of Inequality Predict System Legitimacy Differently Depending on the Social Structure
Brandt, M. J., & Reyna, C. (2017) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2100 · Cited by 43
Competing Norms of Free Expression and Political Tolerance
Chong, D., & Levy, M. E. (2018) · Social research · doi:10.1353/sor.2018.0010 · Cited by 38
Moral grandstanding and political polarization: A multi-study consideration
Grubbs, J. B., Warmke, B., Tosi, J., & James, A. S. (2020) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104009 · Cited by 41
Speaking Out of Both Sides of Their Mouths
Crawford, J. T., Kay, S. A., & Duke, K. E. (2015) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550614566858 · Cited by 40
A meta-analytic integration of research on the relationship between right-wing ideological attitudes and aggressive tendencies
Van Hiel, A., Onraet, E., Bostyn, D. H., Stadeus, J., Haesevoets, T., Van Assche, J., & Roets, A. (2020) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2020.1778324 · Cited by 37
Blind spots in stigma research? Broadening our perspective on mental illness stigma by exploring ‘what matters most’ in modern Western societies
Schomerus, G., & Angermeyer, M. C. (2021) · Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences · doi:10.1017/s2045796021000111 · Cited by 36
Lay Belief in Biopolitics and Political Prejudice
Suhay, E., Brandt, M. J., & Proulx, T. (2016) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550616667615 · Cited by 37
Scientific literacy, optimism about science and conservatism
Carl, N., & Cofnas, N. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.046 · Cited by 37
When ideology meets conflict-related content: Influences on emotion generation and regulation.
Pliskin, R., Halperin, E., Bar‐Tal, D., & Sheppes, G. (2017) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000317 · Cited by 34
Moving Morality Beyond the In-Group: Liberals and Conservatives Show Differences on Group-Framed Moral Foundations and These Differences Mediate the Relationships to Perceived Bias and Threat
Stewart, B. D., & Morris, D. S. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579908 · Cited by 40
How Ideology Has Hindered Sociological Insight
Martin, C. C. (2015) · The American Sociologist · doi:10.1007/s12108-015-9263-z · Cited by 36
Americans hold their political leaders to a higher discursive standard than rank-and-file co-partisans
Frimer, J. A., & Skitka, L. J. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103907 · Cited by 33
Political extremism and distrust: Does radical political orientation predict political distrust and negative attitudes towards European integration?
Kutiyski, Y., Krouwel, A. P. M., & van Prooijen, J. (2019) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2019.03.004 · Cited by 34
Political Ideology and Executive Functioning: The Effect of Conservatism and Liberalism on Cognitive Flexibility and Working Memory Performance
Buechner, B. M., Clarkson, J. J., Otto, A. S., Hirt, E. R., & Ho, M.-C. (2020) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620913187 · Cited by 35
Mapping principal dimensions of prejudice in the United States.
Bergh, R., & Brandt, M. J. (2021) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000360 · Cited by 31
Dealing in hope: Does observing hope expressions increase conciliatory attitudes in intergroup conflict?
Cohen-Chen, S., van Kleef, G. A., Crisp, R. J., & Halperin, E. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.04.002 · Cited by 41
Can intelligence explain the overrepresentation of liberals and leftists in American academia?
Carl, N. (2015) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.10.008 · Cited by 35
The Hateful People: Populist Attitudes Predict Interpersonal and Intergroup Hate
Martínez, C. A., van Prooijen, J., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2022) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506221127491 · Cited by 35
Free speech as a cultural value in the United States
Alvarez, M. J., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2018) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v5i2.590 · Cited by 31
Impulsivity, internalizing symptoms, and online group behavior as determinants of online hate
Kaakinen, M., Sirola, A., Savolainen, I., & Oksanen, A. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231052 · Cited by 37
Implicit bias, ideological bias, and epistemic risks in philosophy
Peters, U. (2018) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12194 · Cited by 32
Worldview Conflict in Daily Life
Brandt, M. J., Crawford, J. T., & Tongeren, D. R. V. (2017) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617733517 · Cited by 33
Why we can’t talk openly about race: The impact of race and partisanship on respondents’ perceptions of intergroup conversations
Appiah, O., Eveland, W. P., Bullock, O. M., & Coduto, K. D. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220967978 · Cited by 29
Are Populists Politically Intolerant? Citizens’ Populist Attitudes and Tolerance of Various Political Antagonists
Bos, L., Wichgers, L., & van Spanje, J. (2021) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00323217211049299 · Cited by 29
At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and ConservativesPreprint
Ditto, P. H., Liu, B., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., & Zinger, J. F. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2952510 · Cited by 31
Trustworthiness and Ideological Similarity (But Not Ideology) Promote Empathy
Stevens, S., Jago, C. P., Jaśko, K., & Heyman, G. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167220972245 · Cited by 13
From Threat to Relief: Expressing Prejudice toward Atheists as a Self-Regulatory Strategy Protecting the Religious Orthodox from Threat
Kossowska, M., Szwed, P., Czernatowicz‐Kukuczka, A., Sekerdej, M. B., & Wyczesany, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00873 · Cited by 31
Persistent beliefs: Political extremism predicts ideological stability over time
Zwicker, M. V., van Prooijen, J., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2020) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220917753 · Cited by 37
Ignorance of History and Political Differences in Perception of Racism in the United States
Zell, E., & Lesick, T. L. (2021) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506211056493 · Cited by 33
Ideological Bias in Social Psychological Research
Jussim, L. J., Crawford, J. T., Anglin, S. M., & Stevens, S. T. (2015) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315717104-12 · Cited by 29
I know that I know nothing: Can puncturing the illusion of explanatory depth overcome the relationship between attitudinal dissimilarity and prejudice?
Voelkel, J. G., Brandt, M. J., & Colombo, M. (2018) · Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/23743603.2018.1464881 · Cited by 28
Hate Speech Is in the Eye of the Beholder: The Influence of Racial Attitudes and Freedom of Speech Beliefs on Perceptions of Racially Motivated Threats of Violence
Roussos, G., & Dovidio, J. F. (2018) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617748728 · Cited by 28
Public Support for the Punishment of Police Use of Force Errors: Evidence of Ideological Divergence and Convergence
Patil, S. V. (2018) · Police Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1098611118766647 · Cited by 26
Liberal-conservative asymmetries in anti-democratic tendencies are partly explained by psychological differences in a nationally representative U.S. sample
Santos, D. D. O., & Jost, J. T. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00096-3 · Cited by 31
Pushing Back Against the Microaggression Pushback in Academic Psychology: Reflections on a Concept-Creep Paradox
Hodson, G. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691621991863 · Cited by 26
Assessing the efficacy of a participant-vetting procedure to improve data-quality on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk
Rivera, E. D., Wilkowski, B. M., Moss, A. J., Rosenzweig, C., & Litman, L. (2022) · Methodology · doi:10.5964/meth.8331 · Cited by 26
Political Bias in the Social Sciences: A Critical, Theoretical, and Empirical Review
Honeycutt, N., & Jussim, L. J. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29148-7_5 · Cited by 27
Right‐ and left‐wing prejudice toward dissimilar groups in cultural and economic domains
Czarnek, G., Szwed, P., & Kossowska, M. (2018) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2548 · Cited by 32
Cultural inertia, identity, and intergroup dynamics in a changing context
Zárate, M. A., Reyna, C., & Álvarez, M. J. (2019) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2018.11.001 · Cited by 31
Respect and political disagreement: Can intergroup respect reduce the biased evaluation of outgroup arguments?
Eschert, S., & Simon, B. C. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211556 · Cited by 30
Ideological reactivity: Political conservatism and brain responsivity to emotional and neutral stimuli.
Tritt, S. M., Peterson, J. B., Page‐Gould, E., & Inzlicht, M. (2016) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000150 · Cited by 32
Basking in detected vice: Outgroup immorality enhances self-view
Sacchi, S., Brambilla, M., & Graupmann, V. (2020) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430219895320 · Cited by 23
The effect of human versus automated interaction on willingness to participate in government programs: The role of representation
Miller, S. M., Song, M., & Keiser, L. R. (2022) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12879 · Cited by 25
Affective Polarization and Political Belief Systems: The Role of Political Identity and the Content and Structure of Political Beliefs
Turner-Zwinkels, F. M., van Noord, J., Kesberg, R., García‐Sánchez, E., Brandt, M. J., Kuppens, T., Easterbrook, M. J., Smets, L., Gorska, P., Marchlewska, M., et al. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672231183935 · Cited by 30
Evidence of decreased system justification among extreme conservatives in non-American samples
Caricati, L. (2019) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2019.1567455 · Cited by 30
Ingroup and outgroup interconnectedness predict and promote political ideology through empathy
Sparkman, D. J., Eidelman, S., & Till, D. F. (2019) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430218819794 · Cited by 23
Profit Versus Prejudice
Stagnaro, M. N., Dunham, Y. C., & Rand, D. G. (2017) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617699254 · Cited by 23
“Social Workers Can’t Be Republicans”: Engaging Conservative Students in the Classroom
Lerner, J. E. (2019) · Journal of Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/10437797.2019.1642274 · Cited by 22
Extreme party animals: Effects of political identification and ideological extremity
Brown, J. K., & Hohman, Z. P. (2022) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12863 · Cited by 23
Bringing critical social psychology to the study of political polarization
Balinhas, D. (2022) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12721 · Cited by 23
Ideological values are parametrically associated with empathy neural response to vicarious suffering
Zebarjadi, N., Adler, E., Kluge, A., Sams, M. E., & Lévy, J. (2023) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsad029 · Cited by 23
Political aspects of shared reality
Stern, C., & Ondish, P. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.11.004 · Cited by 22
Political ideology and health risk perceptions of food
Boeuf, B. (2019) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112405 · Cited by 22
Liberals and Conservatives are Similarly Motivated to Avoid Exposure to One Another’s OpinionsPreprint
Frimer, J. A., Skitka, L. J., & Motyl, M. S. (2017) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/mqzue · Cited by 22
A theoretical framework for polarization as the gradual fragmentation of a divided society
Bliuc, A., Betts, J. M., Vergani, M., Bouguettaya, A., & Cristea, M. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00125-1 · Cited by 38
Unasked questions about stereotype accuracy.
Jussim, L. J., Stevens, S. T., & Honeycutt, N. (2018) · Archives of Scientific Psychology · doi:10.1037/arc0000055 · Cited by 26
Stereotypes about compassion across the political spectrum.
Scheffer, J. A., Cameron, C. D., McKee, S. E., Hadjiandreou, E., & Scherer, A. M. (2020) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000820 · Cited by 20
Breaking barriers or maintaining status quo? Female representation in decision-making group of venture capital firms and the funding of woman-led businesses
Xu, L., Ou, A. Y., Park, H. D., & Jiang, H. (2023) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106368 · Cited by 20
A critical evaluation and research agenda for the study of psychological dispositions and political attitudes
Arceneaux, K., Bakker, B. N., Fasching, N., & Yphtach Lelkes, B. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12958 · Cited by 29
What makes professors appear credible: The effect of demographic characteristics and ideological beliefs.
Zhu, L. L., Aquino, K. F., & Vadera, A. K. (2016) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000095 · Cited by 20
“Trumping” conformity: Urges towards conformity to ingroups and nonconformity to morally opposed outgroups
Stein, R. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.12.007 · Cited by 20
Preregistered Replication of “Feeling Superior Is a Bipartisan Issue: Extremity (Not Direction) of Political Views Predicts Perceived Belief Superiority”
Harris, E. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2021) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620968792 · Cited by 27
Disclosing political partisanship polarizes first impressions of faces
Cassidy, B. S., Hughes, C. S., & Krendl, A. C. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0276400 · Cited by 21
The Great Divide: Neither Fairness Nor Kindness Eliminates Moral Derogation of People With Opposing Political Beliefs
McGarry, P. P., Shteynberg, G., Hulsey, T. L., & Heim, A. S. (2023) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506231194279 · Cited by 19
Both‐Sideology Endangers Democracy and Social Science
Jost, J. T. (2024) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12633 · Cited by 23
Ironic Egalitarianism: When hierarchy-attenuating motives increase hierarchy-enhancing beliefs
de Leon, R. P., & Kay, A. C. (2021) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.02.006 · Cited by 22
The personality of violent Jihadists: Examining violent and nonviolent defense of Muslims
Obaidi, M., Bergh, R., Akrami, N., & Dovidio, J. F. (2023) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12880 · Cited by 26
Is Minority Stress in the Eye of the Beholder? A Test of Minority Stress Theory with Christians
Parent, M. C., Brewster, M. E., Cook, S. W., & Harmon, K. A. (2018) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-017-0550-6 · Cited by 20
Social psychological research on prejudice as collective action supporting emergent ingroup members
Ferguson, M. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Reynolds, K. J. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12294 · Cited by 19
Selling effective violence prevention policies to the public: a nationally representative framing experiment
Pickett, J. T., Ivanov, S., & Wozniak, K. H. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-020-09447-6 · Cited by 18
Malleable liberals and fixed conservatives? Political orientation shapes perceived ability to change
Lassetter, B., & Neel, R. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.01.002 · Cited by 18
Ideological Differences in Race and Gender Stereotyping
Stern, C., & Axt, J. R. (2021) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2021.39.2.259 · Cited by 18
Moral Judgments of COVID-19 Social Distancing Violations: The Roles of Perceived Harm and Impurity
Rosenfeld, D. L., & Tomiyama, A. J. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211025433 · Cited by 18
Motivated Egalitarianism
Kay, A. C., de Leon, R. P., Ho, A. K., & Kteily, N. (2023) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09637214231154810 · Cited by 17
Beyond Threat and Uncertainty: The Underpinnings of Conservatism
Proulx, T., & Brandt, M. J. (2017) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.313 · Cited by 17
Contempt of congress: Do liberals and conservatives harbor equivalent negative emotional biases towards ideologically congruent vs. incongruent politicians at the level of individual emotions?
Steiger, R. L., Reyna, C., Wetherell, G. A., & Iverson, G. (2019) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v7i1.822 · Cited by 22
Defectors’ intolerance of others promotes cooperation in the repeated public goods game with opting out
Vlastimil Křivan, A., & Cressman, R. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76506-3 · Cited by 17
Tolerance and Compromise in Social Networks
Genicot, G. (2021) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/717041 · Cited by 18
Ideological Conflict and Prejudice: An Adversarial Collaboration Examining Correlates and Ideological (A)Symmetries
Stern, C., & Crawford, J. T. (2021) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620904275 · Cited by 22
Political Extremism and Perceived Anomie: New Evidence of Political Extremes’ Symmetries and Asymmetries Within French Samples
Ionescu, O., Tavani, J., & Collange, J. (2021) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.573 · Cited by 16
Ideological homophily in board composition and interlock networks: Do liberal directors inhibit viewpoint diversity?
Hudson, K., & Morgan, R. E. (2021) · Corporate Governance An International Review · doi:10.1111/corg.12406 · Cited by 19
Conspiracy Theories and Foreign Policy Narratives: Globalism in Jair Bolsonaro’s Foreign Policy
Guimarães, F. D. S., Moreira, D. C., Silva, I. D. G. D. O. E., & de Mello, A. C. R. (2023) · Latin American Perspectives · doi:10.1177/0094582x221147504 · Cited by 16
Cooperative and conformist behavioural preferences predict the dual dimensions of political ideology
Claessens, S., Sibley, C. G., Chaudhuri, A., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-31721-6 · Cited by 18
Revisiting the Effects of Societal Threat Perceptions on Conflict-related Positions
Elad‐Strenger, J., & Shahar, G. (2017) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002717703684 · Cited by 16
Are the ethnically tolerant free of discrimination, prejudice and political intolerance?
Bizumić, B., Kenny, A. J., Iyer, R., Tanuwira, J., & Huxley, E. (2017) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2263 · Cited by 16
“How do you like them now?” Expected reactions upon discovering that a friend is a political out-group member
Buliga, E., & MacInnis, C. C. (2020) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407520939191 · Cited by 16
Political coherence and certainty as drivers of interpersonal liking over and above similarity
Zimmerman, F., Garbulsky, G., Dan Ariely, C., Sigman, M., & Navajas, J. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abk1909 · Cited by 14
Asymmetric polarization: The perception that republicans pose harm to disadvantaged groups drives democrats' greater dislike of republicans in social contexts
Nair, K., Anderson, R. A., Spelman, T., Mosleh, M., & Kouchaki, M. (2026) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000495 · Cited by 15
Why moral advocacy leads to polarization and proselytization: The role of self-persuasion
Abeywickrama, R. S., Rhee, J. J.-S., Crone, D. L., & Laham, S. M. (2020) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1346 · Cited by 14
Distinguishing Active and Passive Outgroup Tolerance: Understanding Its Prevalence and the Role of Moral Concern
Adelman, L., Verkuyten, M., & Yogeeswaran, K. (2021) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12790 · Cited by 20
Left Threatened by Right: Political Intergroup Bias in the Contemporary Italian Context
Schepisi, M., Porciello, G., Bufalari, I., Aglioti, S. M., & Panasiti, M. S. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00026 · Cited by 14
When moral identity harms: The impact of perceived differences in core values on helping and hurting
Gotowiec, S. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.032 · Cited by 15
Beliefs About the Strauss-Kahn Case in France and Germany: Political Orientation and Sexual Aggression Myths as Local Versus Global Predictors
Helmke, S., Kobusch, P., Rees, J. H., Meyer, T., & Bohner, G. (2013) · doi:10.4119/ijcv-3052 · Cited by 14
Perceived Value Congruence and Attitudes Toward International Relations and Foreign Policies
Wetherell, G. A., Benson, O., Reyna, C., & Brandt, M. J. (2014) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2014.973108 · Cited by 13
Right-wing authoritarianism and stereotype-driven expectations interact in shaping intergroup trust in one-shot vs multiple-round social interactions
Ponsi, G., Panasiti, M. S., Aglioti, S. M., & Liuzza, M. T. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190142 · Cited by 16
Rejecting Opposite Ideologies without Discriminating against Ideological Opponents? Understanding Nonbelievers’ Outgroup Attitudes
Užarević, F., Saroglou, V., & Pichon, I. (2019) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2019.1689980 · Cited by 13
Targeting our blind spot: A metacognitive intervention ameliorates negative feelings, evaluations, and stereotypes towards conservatives in a liberal sample
Reininger, K. M., Krott, N. R., Hoenisch, M., Scheunemann, J., & Moritz, S. (2020) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1227 · Cited by 14

Authors: Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G.
Affiliations: Tilburg University (NL)
DePaul University (US)
Saint Louis University (US)
The College of New Jersey (US)
ORCID: Brandt, Mark J.
Reyna, Christine
Crawford, Jarret T.
Wetherell, Geoffrey
Venue: Current Directions in Psychological Science
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Published: 2014-02
Volume: 23
Issue: 1
Pages: 27-34
ISSN: 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
1467-8721
DOI: 10.1177/0963721413510932
OpenAlex: W2146237990
Cited by: 432
References: 35
Citations by year: 2026: 24 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 6
FWCI: 93.37
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations: Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders: Universiteit van Tilburg
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Academic Freedom and Politics
Keywords: political intolerance, intergroup attitudes, political ideology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis: Intolerance Among Both Liberals and Conservatives

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks