The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-Serving Justifications: Doing Wrong and Feeling Moral
Open accessAbstract
Unethical behavior by “ordinary” people poses significant societal and personal challenges. We present a novel framework centered on the role of self-serving justification to build upon and advance the rapidly expanding research on intentional unethical behavior of people who value their morality highly. We propose that self-serving justifications emerging before and after people engage in intentional ethical violations mitigate the threat to the moral self, enabling them to do wrong while feeling moral. Pre-violation justifications lessen the anticipated threat to the moral self by redefining questionable behaviors as excusable. Post-violation justifications alleviate the experienced threat to the moral self through compensations that balance or lessen violations. We highlight the psychological mechanisms that prompt people to do wrong and feel moral, and suggest future research directions regarding the temporal dimension of self-serving justifications of ethical misconduct.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Shu, L. L., Mažar, N., Gino, F., Dan Ariely, C., & Bazerman, M. H. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1209746109 · Cited by 353
RetractedA Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach
Becker, G. S. (1968) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259394 · Cited by 13,999
(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,872
Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities
Bandura, A. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3 · Cited by 4,228
Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model
Jones, T. M. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258867 · Cited by 4,135
The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance
Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633 · Cited by 2,875
Deception: The Role of Consequences
Uri Gneezy, B. (2005) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828053828662 · Cited by 1,676
Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, S. B., Green, M. C., & Lerner, J. S. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.853 · Cited by 1,400
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Gibson K. W., 2009, Social decision making: Social dilemmas, social values, and ethics, 265
- 10.5465/amr.1991.4278958 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 421
Teaching AI, Ethics, Law and PolicyPreprint
Wilk, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.12470 · Cited by 14
The Look Over Your Shoulder: Unethical Behaviour Decreases in the Physical Presence of ObserversPreprint
Köbis, N., van der Lingen, S., Cruz, T. D. D., Iragorri-Carter, D., van Prooijen, J., Righetti, F., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gxu96 · Cited by 8
Buck, A. D., & Pauwels, L. J. R. (2022) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/14747049221125105 · Cited by 6
Zhang, B., & Xu, D. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04724-9 · Cited by 9
Cognitive dissonance processes serve an action-oriented adaptive function
Harmon‐Jones, E., & Harmon‐Jones, C. (2020) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x19002176 · Cited by 7
Combining ethics and compliance: A systems psychodynamic inquiry into praxis and outcomes
Klerk, J. J. D. (2021) · Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility · doi:10.1111/beer.12336 · Cited by 7
Gender and deception: Evidence from survey data among adolescent gamblers
Guerra, A., Randon, E., & Scorcu, A. E. (2022) · Kyklos · doi:10.1111/kykl.12305 · Cited by 7
Group moral discount: Diffusing blame when judging group members
Vainapel, S., Weisel, O., Zultan, R., & Shalvi, S. (2018) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2106 · Cited by 7
Self-citationPohl, S., Boelsen, H., & Hildt, E. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.01451 · Cited by 7
Self-portrayed honesty and behavioral dishonesty
Yaniv, G., Tobol, Y., & Siniver, E. (2019) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1080/10508422.2019.1678162 · Cited by 7
Liu, T., Chen, Y., Hu, C., Yuan, X. D., Liu, C.-E., & He, W. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17228371 · Cited by 7
How moral flexibility constrains our moral compass
Francesca Gino, B. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316225608.006 · Cited by 7
Malle, B. F., & Phillips, E. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/dzvn4 · Cited by 7
The science of honesty: A review and research agenda
Shalvi, S., Levine, E. E., Thielmann, I., Jayawickreme, E., van Rooij, B., Teodorescu, K., Schurr, A., Furr, R. M., Aglioti, S. M., Zettler, I., et al. (2025) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2025.04.004 · Cited by 15
Self-citationA Lab Model for Symptom Exaggeration: What do we Need?
Niesten, I. J. M., Merckelbach, H. L. G. J., van Impelen, A., Jelícic, M., Manderson, A., & Cheng, M. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychopathology · doi:10.5127/jep.051815 · Cited by 6
Groups and socially responsible production: An experiment with farmers
Vecchi, M. (2022) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2022.01.020 · Cited by 9
Zhang, J., Zhao, H., Zhang, H., & Guo, M. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04760-5 · Cited by 6
Gorshunov, M. A. (2023) · Managerial Finance · doi:10.1108/mf-11-2022-0522 · Cited by 6
Seeing Through the Fog: The Ability to Resolve Ambiguity Reduces Dishonesty
Puntiroli, M., Kandul, S., Bezençon, V., & Lanz, B. (2025) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672241305687 · Cited by 5
Bliuc, A., & Muntele‐Hendreș, D. (2025) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12878 · Cited by 11
Gender moderates the effect of darkness on ethical behaviors: An explanation of disinhibition
Liu, G., Niu, X., & Lin, L. (2018) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.036 · Cited by 9
Marshall, M. J., Marshall, S., & Goonan, D. (2018) · Housing and Society · doi:10.1080/08882746.2018.1529509 · Cited by 6
New orientation of study on economic psychology and behaviour
You, Y. (2019) · Translational Neuroscience · doi:10.1515/tnsci-2019-0015 · Cited by 6
People imitate others' dishonesty but do not intentionally search information about it
Leib, M. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2296 · Cited by 6
Refounding Law and Economics: Behavioral Support for the Predictions of Standard Economic Analysis
Zamir, E. (2019) · Review of Law & Economics · doi:10.1515/rle-2019-0023 · Cited by 4
Negative externalities of cheating: An experiment with charities
Maggian, V. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815857-9.00012-1 · Cited by 6
Goal-related unethical behaviors and meaning in life: The moderating role of goal state
Zhang, H., Ge, X., Liu, Z., & Li, W. (2020) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103970 · Cited by 7
Misreporting in teams with individual decision making: The impact of information and communication
Feess, E., Schilling, T., & Timofeyev, Y. (2023) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2023.03.027 · Cited by 6
Noval, L. J., Molinsky, A. L., & Stahl, G. K. (2018) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.08.003 · Cited by 6
Editorial overview: Morality and ethics: New directions in the study of morality and ethics
Francesca Gino, B., & Shalvi, S. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.11.001 · Cited by 6
Self-citationRobertson, C. E., Akles, M., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2024) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976241246552 · Cited by 5
Leib, M., Köbis, N., & Soraperra, I. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108709 · Cited by 6
Personal relative deprivation and moral self-judgments: The moderating role of sense of control
Zhang, H., Li, W., Wang, J., & Zhang, W. (2024) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104509 · Cited by 5
Curbing Unethical Behavior at Work: What Role for Nudging?
Decrinis, L. (2024) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2024.0013 · Cited by 5
The polite wiggle‐room effect in charity donation decisions
Juanchich, M., Sirota, M., & Bonnefon, J. (2018) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2103 · Cited by 7
RELIGIOUS ETHICS AND EMPIRICAL ETHICS
Moret, R. (2021) · Journal of Religious Ethics · doi:10.1111/jore.12341 · Cited by 5
Revenge is not blind: Testing the ability of retribution to justify dishonesty
Peleg, D., Hochman, G., Levine, T. R., Klar, Y., & Ayal, S. (2021) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500008536 · Cited by 5
Self-citationHan, K., & Kim, M. Y. (2022) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103575 · Cited by 4
Levati, M. V., & Nardi, C. (2022) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2022.102233 · Cited by 6
Decrop, R., & Docherty, M. (2024) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2024.101165 · Cited by 5
One-by-One or All-at-Once? Self-Reporting Policies and Dishonesty
Rilke, R. M., Schurr, A., Barkan, R., & Shalvi, S. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00113 · Cited by 5
Self-citationA Missing Link Between Job Autonomy and Unethical Behavior
Ahmed, A., Shamsi, A. F., & Aziz, M. (2020) · ETIKONOMI · doi:10.15408/etk.v19i1.12391 · Cited by 7
Indulgent citizens: Bribery in Mexico's bureaucratic procedures
Jaimes, C. M. (2022) · Public Administration and Development · doi:10.1002/pad.1978 · Cited by 5
Effects of Gain/Loss Frames on Telling Lies of Omission and Commission
Swol, L. M. V., Polman, E., Paik, J. E., & Chang, C.-T. (2022) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2022.2105307 · Cited by 6
Eristic Legitimation of Controversial Managerial Decisions
Kurdoglu, R. S., & Islam, G. (2023) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13008 · Cited by 4
Proud to Be Dishonest: Emotional Consequences of Altruistic Versus Egoistic Dishonesty
Shuster, S., Eyal, T., Ayal, S., & Moran, S. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2386 · Cited by 4
Self-citationTu, H., Zhong, W., Gu, Y., & Zhou, W. (2024) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13152 · Cited by 5
Children passively allow other’s rule violations in cooperative situations
Ikeda, A., Okumura, Y., Kobayashi, T., & Itakura, S. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-25210-4 · Cited by 4
Rationalization and self-sabotage
D’Cruz, J. (2020) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x19002231 · Cited by 4
Li, D., Turel, O., Zhang, S., & He, Q. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19106326 · Cited by 4
How the self guides empathy choice
Anderson, S., & Cameron, C. D. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104444 · Cited by 4
Meanness trumps language: Lack of foreign language effect in early bilinguals’ moral choices
Flexas, A., Penadés, R. L., Aguilar-Mediavilla, E. M., & Adrover‐Roig, D. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0294523 · Cited by 4
Perceived outgroup characteristics as antecedents and consequences of moral exclusion
Hadarics, M. (2019) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2019.06.006 · Cited by 5
Counteracting dishonesty strategies: A field experiment in life insurance underwriting
Christodoulou, D., Samuell, D., Slonim, R. L., & Tausch, F. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2302 · Cited by 4
Social Justice and Autism: Links to Personality and Advocacy
Kapp, S. K. (2016) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 4
Neuroscience of Moral Decision Making
Hu, Y., Gao, X., Yu, H., He, Z., & Zhou, X. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819641-0.00151-1 · Cited by 5
Impact of multifaceted morality on employee wellbeing: a systematic literature review
Khushk, A., Zhiying, L., Xu, Y., & Liu, H. (2025) · International journal of organizational analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-03-2024-4326 · Cited by 5
Moral Behavior in Organizations
Ellemers, N., & de Gilder, D. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-84175-1_1 · Cited by 3
Recognizing and correcting positive bias: The salient victim effect
Zitek, E. M., Giurge, L. M., & Smith, I. H. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104522 · Cited by 3
A partner in crime: Revisiting the dispositional basis of unethical loyalty
Seidl, A., Hilbig, B. E., & Thielmann, I. (2024) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/08902070241309392 · Cited by 3
Weiß, A., & Forstmann, M. (2025) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.3139 · Cited by 4
Blind spots: The (social) factors of willful ignorance
Reher, K., Götz, M., & Gross, J. (2025) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102100 · Cited by 3
When honesty checks-out: Willful ignorance and the persistence of unethical environments
Houdek, P., & Bahník, Š. (2025) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102185 · Cited by 3
Think twice before using door-in-the-face tactics in repeated negotiation
Wong, R. S., & Howard, S. (2018) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/ijcma-05-2017-0043 · Cited by 4
Visual experience in self and social judgment: How a biased majority claim a superior minority
Balcetis, E., & Cárdenas, S. A. (2018) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2018.1466724 · Cited by 3
Vranka, M. A., Hudík, M., Frollová, N., Bahník, Š., Sýkorová, M., & Houdek, P. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2021.101730 · Cited by 3
Sexual misconduct amongst evangelical leaders: a practical theological reflection
Hussey, I. (2023) · Practical Theology · doi:10.1080/1756073x.2023.2168228 · Cited by 3
Why people engage in corrupt collaboration: an observation at the multi-brain level
Zhang, D., Zhang, S., Lei, Z., Li, Y., Li, X., & Gu, R. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad132 · Cited by 5
Self-serving bias in fairness perception: Allowing allocators to allocate unfairly
Wang, X., & Liu, Y. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04819-3 · Cited by 3
Rottman, J., Foster‐Hanson, E., & Bellersen, S. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105570 · Cited by 4
Beyond monetary value: how reward type drives cheating in a gender-judgment task
Chen, G.-Z., Zhao, F.-F., Li, H.-M., Wu, Y.-W., & Yan, W. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1290793 · Cited by 3
Feldman, G. (2018) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617737141 · Cited by 3
Comportements (non) éthiques et stratégies morales
Villeval, M. C. (2019) · Revue économique · doi:10.3917/reco.706.1021 · Cited by 3
Propensity to Morally Disengage: The Malevolent Leader Dyad of Andrew Carnegie and Henry Frick
Randolph-Seng, B., Humphreys, J. H., Novičević, M. M., Ingram, K., & Roberts, F. (2020) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1529-209620200000024018 · Cited by 3
Do Advertising Pieces that Portray Brazilian Jeitinho Influence Dishonest Behavior?
Farias, J. E. M., & Pilati, R. (2021) · Psico-USF · doi:10.1590/1413-82712021260212 · Cited by 3
Community Standards of DeceptionPreprint
Levine, E. (2015) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2607590 · Cited by 3
Interrogating the paradox: distributed leadership and 'Sheikhocracy' in Jordanian schools leadership
Hashem, R. (2018) · Figshare · Cited by 3
Hillebrandt, A., & Barclay, L. J. (2021) · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14639523 · Cited by 2
Cheat, cheat, repeat: On the consistency of dishonest behavior in structurally comparable situationsPreprint
Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., Schild, C., & Heck, D. W. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ntg6c · Cited by 3
Giacomantonio, M., Andrighetto, L., & Cristofaro, V. D. (2025) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-025-10124-2 · Cited by 2
The ethics mirror? Comparing LLM and human responses to ethical dilemmas of varying complexity
Tzini, K., Illia, L., & Zyglidopoulos, S. C. (2025) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2025.12.002 · Cited by 2
When fraud becomes routine fuels exhaustion, while professional skepticism counters ethical fatigue
Qaiser, A., & Ahmed, A. (2026) · International Journal of Ethics and Systems · doi:10.1108/ijoes-12-2025-0780 · Cited by 2
Zum Einfluss einer Ehrlichkeitserklärung auf die Authentizität von Beschwerdedarstellungen
Kobelt-Pönicke, A., Walter, F., Lid, N., & Ramien, N. (2020) · Die Rehabilitation · doi:10.1055/a-1195-7986 · Cited by 2
Höchli, B., Brügger, A., & Messner, C. (2021) · International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1612197x.2021.1891000 · Cited by 2
Self-serving dishonesty: The role of confidence in driving dishonesty
Heger, S., Slonim, R. L., & Tausch, F. (2022) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-022-09380-1 · Cited by 2
Concerted Collusion: Studying Multiagency Institutional Cover-Up
Montgomery, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.847376 · Cited by 2
How to cope with the threat to moral self? The perspectives of memory bias in moral contexts
Xiuxin, W. A. N. G., & Yifan, S. H. E. N. (2022) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2022.01604 · Cited by 2
Strategic curiosity: An experimental study of curiosity and dishonesty
Ay, F. C., Berge, J. W., & Nødtvedt, K. B. (2023) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2023.10.039 · Cited by 2
Cognitive empathy boosts honesty in children and young adolescents
Gordon‐Hecker, T., Shalvi, S., Uzefovsky, F., & Bereby‐Meyer, Y. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105869 · Cited by 2
Self-citationRösler, I. K., van Nunspeet, F., & Ellemers, N. (2024) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-024-01164-1 · Cited by 2
Stroube, B. K., & Zavyalova, A. A. (2024) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.16682 · Cited by 2
Pathways for avoiding self‐sanction: How consumers give themselves a PASS on virtue violations
Lin, S. (2025) · Consumer Psychology Review · doi:10.1002/arcp.1106 · Cited by 2
Self-serving regret: experimental evidence from a reciprocity game
Lian, Z., Shen, X., & Zheng, J. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-04314-5 · Cited by 2
Tian, H., Wei, X., Yu, F., & Xu, L. (2025) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-025-05977-z · Cited by 3
The Avatar Effect: The harmful consequences of decision-making through a 'separate' entity.
MacDonald, C. (2020) · Open Science Journal · doi:10.23954/osj.v5i3.2380 · Cited by 2
Being (Un)Ethical in Workplaces: The Theories and the Empirics
Chakrabarti, G., & Chatterjea, T. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-0687-1_2 · Cited by 2
Bhattacharya, P., Nielsen, K., & Sengupta, A. (2020) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/ueaa042 · Cited by 2
Kvalnes, Ø. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15191-1_13 · Cited by 2
Online Deceptive Impression Management: Self-admission and Other Estimates of False Facebook-selves
Möller, T. J., Doms, B., & Stel, M. (2022) · The Open Psychology Journal · doi:10.2174/18743501-v15-e2206090 · Cited by 2
Avatars, disconnecting agents: exploring the nuances of the avatar effect in online discourse
MacDonald, C. (2020) · Open Science Journal · doi:10.23954/osj.v5i2.2385 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Shalvi, S., Gino, F., Barkan, R., & Ayal, S.
- Affiliations
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- Harvard Business School, Harvard University
- Reichman University (IL)
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-130
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- OpenAlex
- W2097587915
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15
- FWCI
- 70.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, FP7/2007, 333745)
- Research Executive Agency (FP7/2007-2013)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Keywords
- moral self, moral dissonance, moral licensing, moral compensation, moral self-presentation, ethical violations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review