Cited by 422Ethics in Business and EducationPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentEmotions and Moral Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self-Serving Justifications: Doing Wrong and Feeling Moral

Open access

Shalvi, Shaul, Gino, Francesca, Barkan, Rachel, Ayal, Shahar·2015·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Unethical behavior by “ordinary” people poses significant societal and personal challenges. We present a novel framework centered on the role of self-serving justification to build upon and advance the rapidly expanding research on intentional unethical behavior of people who value their morality highly. We propose that self-serving justifications emerging before and after people engage in intentional ethical violations mitigate the threat to the moral self, enabling them to do wrong while feeling moral. Pre-violation justifications lessen the anticipated threat to the moral self by redefining questionable behaviors as excusable. Post-violation justifications alleviate the experienced threat to the moral self through compensations that balance or lessen violations. We highlight the psychological mechanisms that prompt people to do wrong and feel moral, and suggest future research directions regarding the temporal dimension of self-serving justifications of ethical misconduct.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721414553264

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

1 retracted

RETRACTED: Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end
Shu, L. L., Mažar, N., Gino, F., Dan Ariely, C., & Bazerman, M. H. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1209746109 · Cited by 353
Retracted
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach
Becker, G. S. (1968) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259394 · Cited by 13,999
Untitled work
(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,872
Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities
Bandura, A. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3 · Cited by 4,228
Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model
Jones, T. M. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258867 · Cited by 4,135
The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance
Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633 · Cited by 2,875
Deception: The Role of Consequences
Uri Gneezy, B. (2005) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828053828662 · Cited by 1,676
The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals.
Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, S. B., Green, M. C., & Lerner, J. S. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.853 · Cited by 1,400

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

Gibson K. W., 2009, Social decision making: Social dilemmas, social values, and ethics, 265
10.5465/amr.1991.4278958 · DOI · Paper page

Sorted by citations

Information Avoidance
Golman, R., Hagmann, D., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2017) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20151245 · Cited by 835
Assessing the Effect of 'Disputed' Warnings and Source Salience on Perceptions of Fake News Accuracy
Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Collins, E., & Rand, D. G. (2017) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3478 · Cited by 903
Resolving the Meat-Paradox: A Motivational Account of Morally Troublesome Behavior and Its Maintenance
Bastian, B. B., & Loughnan, S. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868316647562 · Cited by 384
Civic honesty around the globe
Cohn, A., Maréchal, M. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Zünd, C. L. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau8712 · Cited by 361
Meat-related cognitive dissonance: A conceptual framework for understanding how meat eaters reduce negative arousal from eating animals
Rothgerber, H. (2019) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.104511 · Cited by 286
WHY DO WE LIE? A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO THE DISHONESTY LITERATURE
Jacobsen, C., Fosgaard, T. R., & Pascual‐Ezama, D. (2017) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12204 · Cited by 236
Moral Judgments
Malle, B. F. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-072220-104358 · Cited by 254
Motivated Bayesians: Feeling Moral While Acting Egoistically
Gino, F., Norton, M. I., & Weber, R. A. (2016) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.30.3.189 · Cited by 208
Bad machines corrupt good morals
Köbis, N., Bonnefon, J., & Rahwan, I. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01128-2 · Cited by 225
Ethical dissonance, justifications, and moral behavior
Barkan, R., Ayal, S., & Dan Ariely, C. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.001 · Cited by 194
Self-citation
Cleansing my abuse: A reparative response model of perpetrating abusive supervisor behavior
Liao, Z., Yam, K. C., Johnson, R. E., Liu, W., & Song, Z. (2018) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000319 · Cited by 151
Memories of unethical actions become obfuscated over time
Kouchaki, M., & Gino, F. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1523586113 · Cited by 147
Justifications Shape Ethical Blind Spots
Pittarello, A., Leib, M., Gordon‐Hecker, T., & Shalvi, S. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615571018 · Cited by 141
Self-citation
The Moral Self-Image Scale: Measuring and Understanding the Malleability of the Moral Self
Jordan, J., Leliveld, M. C., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01878 · Cited by 140
Three Principles to REVISE People’s Unethical Behavior
Ayal, S., Gino, F., Barkan, R., & Dan Ariely, C. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615598512 · Cited by 153
Self-citation
Winning a competition predicts dishonest behavior
Schurr, A., & Ritov, I. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1515102113 · Cited by 138
The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework
C. Köbis, N., Soraperra, I., & Shalvi, S. (2021) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320967740 · Cited by 129
Self-citation
Disentangling Crowdfunding from Fraudfunding
Cumming, D. J., Hornuf, L., Karami, M., & Schweizer, D. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04942-w · Cited by 134
Bounded awareness: Implications for ethical decision making
Bazerman, M. H., & Sezer, O. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.11.004 · Cited by 129
Ethical blind spots: explaining unintentional unethical behavior
Sezer, O., Francesca Gino, B., & Bazerman, M. H. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.030 · Cited by 117
The Role of Power and Incentives in Inducing Fake Reviews in the Tourism Industry
Choi, S., Mattila, A. S., Hoof, H. B. V., & Quadri-Felitti, D. (2016) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287516677168 · Cited by 110
Using Charity Performance Metrics as an Excuse Not to Give
Exley, C. L. (2019) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3268 · Cited by 109
The dark side of experiencing job autonomy: Unethical behavior
Lu, J. G., Brockner, J., Vardi, Y., & Weitz, E. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.05.007 · Cited by 103
Are social desirability scales desirable? A meta‐analytic test of the validity of social desirability scales in the context of prosocial behavior
Lanz, L., Thielmann, I., & Gerpott, F. H. (2021) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12662 · Cited by 101
Laboratory Measure of Cheating Predicts School Misconduct
Cohn, A., & Maréchal, M. A. (2017) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12572 · Cited by 95
A Moral Cleansing Process: How and When Does Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior Increase Prohibitive and Promotive Voice
Wang, Y., Xiao, S. S., & Ren, R. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04697-w · Cited by 90
Unethical employee behaviour: a review and typology
Veetikazhi, R., Kamalanabhan, T. J., Malhotra, P., Arora, R., & Mueller, A. (2020) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2020.1810738 · Cited by 100
Motivated misremembering of selfish decisions
Carlson, R. W., Maréchal, M. A., Oud, B., Fehr, E., & Crockett, M. J. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15602-4 · Cited by 92
Uncertainty about the impact of social decisions increases prosocial behaviour
Kappes, A., Nussberger, A.-M., Faber, N. S., Kahane, G., Savulescu, J., & Crockett, M. J. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0372-x · Cited by 79
Free will beliefs predict attitudes toward unethical behavior and criminal punishment
Martin, N. D., Rigoni, D., & Vohs, K. D. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1702119114 · Cited by 81
General Belief in a Just World Is Positively Associated with Dishonest Behavior
Wenzel, K., Schindler, S., & Reinhard, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01770 · Cited by 78
A Social Psychological View on the Social Norms of Corruption
Köbis, N., Iragorri-Carter, D., & Starke, C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66254-1_3 · Cited by 79
Ethical Free Riding: When Honest People Find Dishonest Partners
Gross, J., Leib, M., Offerman, T., & Shalvi, S. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797618796480 · Cited by 77
Self-citation
“I can see it in your eyes”: Biased Processing and Increased Arousal in Dishonest Responses
Hochman, G., Glöckner, A., Fiedler, S., & Ayal, S. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1932 · Cited by 77
Self-citation
How inferred motives shape moral judgements
Carlson, R. W., Bigman, Y., Gray, K. J., Ferguson, M. J., & Crockett, M. J. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00071-x · Cited by 88
Cheating to get ahead or to avoid falling behind? The effect of potential negative versus positive status change on unethical behavior
Pettit, N. C., Doyle, S., Lount, R. B., & To, C. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.09.005 · Cited by 78
Corrupted by Algorithms? How AI-generated and Human-written Advice Shape (Dis)honesty
Leib, M., Köbis, N., Rilke, R. M., Hagens, M., & Irlenbusch, B. (2023) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/uead056 · Cited by 80
Crafting messages to fight dishonesty: A field investigation of the effects of social norms and watching eye cues on fare evasion
Ayal, S., Celse, J., & Hochman, G. (2019) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.10.003 · Cited by 75
Self-citation
Behavioural Insights for Public Integrity
OECD (2018) · OECD public governance reviews · doi:10.1787/9789264297067-en · Cited by 85
Honesty in the digital age
Cohn, A., Gesche, T., & Maréchal, M. A. (2022) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2021.3985 · Cited by 62
Deliberate honesty
Bereby‐Meyer, Y., & Shalvi, S. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.004 · Cited by 57
Self-citation
Modeling Morality in 3‐D: Decision‐Making, Judgment, and Inference
Yu, H., Siegel, J. Z., & Crockett, M. J. (2018) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12382 · Cited by 65
The effects of extreme rituals on moral behavior: The performers-observers gap hypothesis
Mitkidis, P., Ayal, S., Shalvi, S., Heimann, K. S., Levy, G., Kyselo, M., Wallot, S., Dan Ariely, C., & Roepstorff, A. (2017) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2016.12.007 · Cited by 56
Self-citation
Justifying Dissent
Bursztyn, L., Egorov, G., Haaland, I., Rao, A., & Roth, C. (2022) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjad007 · Cited by 51
The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them)
Wicherts, J. M. (2017) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani7120090 · Cited by 56
Why Does the “Sinner” Act Prosocially? The Mediating Role of Guilt and the Moderating Role of Moral Identity in Motivating Moral Cleansing
Ding, W., Xie, R., Sun, B., Li, W., Wang, D., & Zhen, R. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01317 · Cited by 53
An economic model of the meat paradox
Hestermann, N., Yaouanq, Y. L., & Treich, N. (2020) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103569 · Cited by 56
Rule Orientation and Behavior: Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Individual Acceptance of Rule Violation
Fine, A., van Rooij, B., Feldman, Y., Shalvi, S., Scheper, E., Leib, M., & Cauffman, E. E. (2016) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/law0000096 · Cited by 51
Self-citation
An Economic Analysis of Rebates Conditional on Positive Reviews
Chen, J., Guo, Z., & Huang, J. V. (2018) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2021.1048 · Cited by 50
Can Honesty Oaths, Peer Interaction, or Monitoring Mitigate Lying?
Beck, T., Bühren, C., Frank, B., & Khachatryan, E. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-4030-z · Cited by 49
The evolution of lying in well-mixed populations
Capraro, V., Perc, M., & Vilone, D. (2019) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2019.0211 · Cited by 49
Moral Rationalization Contributes More Strongly to Escalation of Unethical Behavior Among Low Moral Identifiers Than Among High Moral Identifiers
Mulder, L. B., & van Dijk, E. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02912 · Cited by 51
Ethical dissonance in environmental advertising: Moderating effects of self-benefit versus other-benefit appeals
Kim, W.-J., Ryoo, Y., Yoon, S., & Kim, K. K. (2021) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2021.1988218 · Cited by 47
Seeing is Knowing: On the Predictive Accuracy of Self– and Informant Reports for Prosocial and Moral Behaviours
Thielmann, I., Zimmermann, J., Leising, D., & Hilbig, B. E. (2017) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2112 · Cited by 42
Cheating and Feeling Honest: Committing and Punishing Analog versus Digital Academic Dishonesty Behaviors in Higher Education
Friedman, A., Blau, I., & Eshet‐Alkalai, Y. (2016) · Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning · doi:10.28945/3629 · Cited by 42
Ethics education in teacher preparation: a case for stakeholder responsibility
Malone, D. M. (2019) · Ethics and Education · doi:10.1080/17449642.2019.1700447 · Cited by 51
Egocentrism shapes moral judgements
Bocian, K., Baryła, W., & Wojciszke, B. (2020) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12572 · Cited by 48
Is behaving unethically for organizations a mixed blessing? A dual-pathway model for the work-to-family spillover effects of unethical pro-organizational behavior
Chen, H., Kwan, H. K., & Xin, J. (2021) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-021-09776-8 · Cited by 42
No gain without pain: The psychological costs of dishonesty
Thielmann, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2018) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2018.06.001 · Cited by 40
Lying on networks: The role of structure and topology in promoting honesty
Capraro, V., Perc, M., & Vilone, D. (2020) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.101.032305 · Cited by 38
Predicting self-reported research misconduct and questionable research practices in university students using an augmented Theory of Planned Behavior
Rajah-Kanagasabai, C. J., & Roberts, L. D. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00535 · Cited by 47
Tests and academic cheating: do learning tasks influence cheating by way of negative evaluations?
Wenzel, K., & Reinhard, M. (2020) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-020-09556-0 · Cited by 50
Frequency of enforcement is more important than the severity of punishment in reducing violation behaviors
Teodorescu, K., Plonsky, O., Ayal, S., & Barkan, R. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2108507118 · Cited by 39
Self-citation
Nobody is as Blind as Those Who Cannot Bear to See: Psychoanalytic Perspectives on the Management of Emotions and Moral Blindness
de Klerk, J. J. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3114-x · Cited by 35
Dealing with the meat paradox: Threat leads to moral disengagement from meat consumption
Buttlar, B., & Walther, E. (2019) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.02.017 · Cited by 37
Responsibility gaps and self-interest bias: People attribute moral responsibility to AI for their own but not others' transgressions
Dong, M., & Bocian, K. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104584 · Cited by 35
Regulating “Good” People in Subtle Conflicts of Interest Situations
Feldman, Y., & Halali, E. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3468-8 · Cited by 38
Rule Following Mitigates Collaborative Cheating and Facilitates the Spreading of Honesty Within Groups
Gross, J., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167220927195 · Cited by 37
Lying about luck versus lying about performance
Kajackaite, A. (2018) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.07.010 · Cited by 34
The Co-evolution of Honesty and Strategic Vigilance
Heintz, C., Karabegović, M., & Molnár, A. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01503 · Cited by 35
Two-Faced Morality: Distrust Promotes Divergent Moral Standards for the Self Versus Others
Weiß, A., Burgmer, P., & Mussweiler, T. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218775693 · Cited by 35
Meta-nudging honesty: Past, present, and future of the research frontier
Dimant, E., & Shalvi, S. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101426 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
Daring dishonesty: On the role of sanctions for (un)ethical behavior
Thielmann, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.06.009 · Cited by 34
Being “good” or “good enough”: Prosocial risk and the structure of moral self-regard.
Zlatev, J. J., Kupor, D. M., Laurin, K., & Miller, D. T. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000175 · Cited by 32
Lying to appear honest.
Choshen‐Hillel, S., Shaw, A., & Caruso, E. M. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000737 · Cited by 35
Entering an upward spiral: Investigating how and when supervisors' talking about abuse leads to subsequent abusive supervision
Chen, C., Qin, X., Johnson, R. E., Huang, M., Yang, M., & Liu, S. (2021) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2501 · Cited by 36
Regulatory decoupling and the effectiveness of the ISO 9001 quality management system in the construction sector in the UK – a case study analysis
Brooks, T., Gunning, J. G., Spillane, J. P., & Cole, J. (2021) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446193.2021.1983186 · Cited by 32
When and Why People Evaluate Negative Reciprocity as More Fair Than Positive Reciprocity
Shaw, A., Barakzai, A., & Keysar, B. (2019) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12773 · Cited by 31
Why public employees manipulate performance data: prosocial impact, job stress, and red tape
Kroll, A., & Vogel, D. (2021) · International Public Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10967494.2021.1874579 · Cited by 34
Stimulating the Right Temporoparietal Junction with tDCS Decreases Deception in Moral Hypocrisy and Unfairness
Tang, H., Ye, P., Wang, S., Zhu, R., Su, S., Tong, L., & Liu, C. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02033 · Cited by 31
To Give or Not to Give? Choosing Chance Under Moral Conflict
Lin, S., & Reich, T. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1008 · Cited by 30
Common and distinct neural correlates of self‐serving and prosocial dishonesty
Pornpattananangkul, N., Zhen, S., & Yu, R. (2018) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24062 · Cited by 29
Self-Compassion Relates to Reduced Unethical Behavior Through Lower Moral Disengagement
Yang, Y., Guo, Z., Wu, J., & Kou, Y. (2020) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01354-1 · Cited by 29
When negotiators with honest reputations are less (and more) likely to be deceived
SimanTov‐Nachlieli, I., Har-Vardi, L., & Moran, S. (2020) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.11.006 · Cited by 28
The Moral Identity and Immoral Behavior
Stets, J. E., & McCaffree, K. J. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190873066.003.0008 · Cited by 28
Changing Ethically Troublesome Behavior: The Causes, Consequences, and Solutions to Motivated Resistance
Bastian, B. B. (2018) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12048 · Cited by 35
Motivation and the Virtue of Honesty: Some Conceptual Requirements and Empirical Results
Miller, C. (2020) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-019-10055-1 · Cited by 28
Corruption: A cross-country comparison of contagion and conformism
Schram, A. J. H. C., Zheng, J. D., & Zhuravleva, T. (2021) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.11.017 · Cited by 28
Cheating when in the hole: The case of New York city taxis
Rajgopal, S., & White, R. (2019) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2019.101070 · Cited by 25
Between me and we: The importance of self-profit versus social justifiability for ethical decision making
Klein, S. A., Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2017) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500006690 · Cited by 27
Cheating to benefit others? On the relation between Honesty‐Humility and prosocial lies
Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., Klein, S. A., Seidl, A., & Heck, D. W. (2023) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12835 · Cited by 26
What Provides Justification for Cheating—Producing or Observing Counterfactuals?
Bassarak, C., Leib, M., Mischkowski, D., Strang, S., Glöckner, A., & Shalvi, S. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2013 · Cited by 25
Self-citation
Keeping Each Other Safe
Aronie, J., & Lopez, C. E. (2017) · Police Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1098611117710443 · Cited by 27
Motivated empathic choices
Cameron, C. D., Scheffer, J. A., Hadjiandreou, E., & Anderson, S. (2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2022.04.005 · Cited by 27
Doing justice to creative justifications: Creativity, Honesty-Humility, and (un)ethical justifications
Ścigała, K. A., Schild, C., & Zettler, I. (2020) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104033 · Cited by 25
(Dis)honesty in the face of uncertain gains or losses
Steinel, W., Valtcheva, K., Gross, J., Celse, J., Max, S., & Shalvi, S. (2022) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2022.102487 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
The consequences of dishonesty
Wiltermuth, S. S., Newman, D. T., & Raj, M. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.016 · Cited by 24
Unethical amnesia responds more to instrumental than to hedonic motives
Galeotti, F., Saucet, C., & Villeval, M. C. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2011291117 · Cited by 24
Moral currencies: Explaining corrupt collaboration
Weisel, O., & Shalvi, S. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.034 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Paternalistic lies
Lupoli, M. J., Levine, E. E., & Greenberg, A. E. (2018) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.01.001 · Cited by 27

Authors: Shalvi, S., Gino, F., Barkan, R., & Ayal, S.
Affiliations: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Harvard Business School, Harvard University
Reichman University (IL)
ORCID: Shalvi, Shaul
Barkan, Rachel
Ayal, Shahar
Venue: Current Directions in Psychological Science
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Published: 2015-04
Volume: 24
Issue: 2
Pages: 125-130
ISSN: 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
1467-8721
DOI: 10.1177/0963721414553264
OpenAlex: W2097587915
Cited by: 422
References: 44
Citations by year: 2026: 31 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15
FWCI: 70.12
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Licence: journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations: Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Funders: European Commission (2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, FP7/2007, 333745)
Research Executive Agency (FP7/2007-2013)
Topics: Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords: moral self, moral dissonance, moral licensing, moral compensation, moral self-presentation, ethical violations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Self-Serving Justifications: Doing Wrong and Feeling Moral

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks