Cited by 29Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Are sluggish cognitive tempo, ADHD, and oppositional defiant disorder trait- or state-like constructs from prekindergarten to fourth grade?

Open access
Burns, G. Leonard, Becker, Stephen P., Geiser, Christian, Leopold, Daniel R., Willcutt, Erik G.·2020·Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Abstract

The objective was to determine the proportion of trait (consistency across occasions) and occasion-specific variance in sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT), attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)–inattention (IN), ADHD–hyperactivity/impulsivity (HI), and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptom ratings. A single trait factor-multiple state factors model was applied to parent ratings of SCT, ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and ODD symptoms for 978 children (50% female) across prekindergarten (M = 4.90 years), kindergarten (M = 6.27 years), 1st-grade (M = 7.42 years), 2nd-grade (M = 8.45 years), and 4th-grade (M = 10.45 years) assessments. For the prekindergarten assessment, SCT, ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and ODD contained more occasion-specific than trait variance (54%, 64%, 56%, and 55% occasion-specific variance, respectively). In contrast, SCT, ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and ODD contained more trait than occasion-specific variance for the kindergarten through 4th-grade assessments (62%–72%, 65%–68%, 71%–75%, and 60%–69% trait variance, respectively). SCT, ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and ODD are slightly to moderately more state-like than trait-like during the prekindergarten developmental period but are more stable traits than fluctuating states from kindergarten to 4th grade. Findings indicate that, particularly after children start formal schooling, these psychopathology dimensions are primarily stable traits; implications for assessment are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15374416.2019.1567348

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SCT elevations have been reported in children exposed prenatally to alcohol or maternal smoking, pediatric traumatic brain injury survivors, and youth with spina bifida.

    “SCT elevations were reported in children exposed prenatally to alcohol44,45 or maternal smoking,46 pediatric traumatic brain injury survivors,47 and youth with spina bifida.48”

    From Report of a Work Group on Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Key Research Directions and a Consensus Change in Terminology to Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (2023) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Method (Participants and Procedures; page unavailable) describes a longitudinal study of Colorado twins, and the Discussion (Clinical Implications; page unavailable) addresses assessment of SCT in young children. Neither passage reports SCT elevations after prenatal alcohol or maternal-smoking exposure, traumatic brain injury, or spina bifida; searches for those conditions found no matching passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Muthén LK, & Muthén BO (1998– 2017). Mplus User’s Guide (8th Edition). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burns, G. L., Becker, S. P., Geiser, C., Leopold, D. R., & Willcutt, E. G.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • Utah State University (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Burns, G. Leonard
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2019-04-15
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
460-468
ISSN
  • 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4424
OpenAlex
W2939337081
Cited by
29
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH108603)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50HD027802)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
sluggish cognitive tempo, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, symptom stability, parent ratings, early childhood development, elementary school students, inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review