Cited by 459Mental Health Research TopicsSurvey Methodology and NonresponsePsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The effects of sampling frequency and questionnaire length on perceived burden, compliance, and careless responding in experience sampling data in a student population

Open access
Eisele, Gudrun, Vachon, Hugo, Lafit, Ginette, Kuppens, Peter, Houben, Marlies, Myin-Germeys, Inez, Viechtbauer, Wolfgang·2022·Assessment

Abstract

Currently, little is known about the association between assessment intensity, burden, data quantity, and data quality in experience sampling method (ESM) studies. Researchers therefore have insufficient information to make informed decisions about the design of their ESM study. Our aim was to investigate the effects of different sampling frequencies and questionnaire lengths on burden, compliance, and careless responding. Students ( n = 163) received either a 30- or 60-item questionnaire three, six, or nine times per day for 14 days. Preregistered multilevel regression analyses and analyses of variance were used to analyze the effect of design condition on momentary outcomes, changes in those outcomes over time, and retrospective outcomes. Our findings offer support for increased burden and compromised data quantity and quality with longer questionnaires, but not with increased sampling frequency. We therefore advise against the use of long ESM questionnaires, while high-sampling frequencies do not seem to be associated with negative consequences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073191120957102

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Arslan, R. C., Reitz, A. K., Driebe, J. C., Gerlach, T. M., & Penke, L. (2019, June 27). Routinely randomise the display and order of items to estimate and adjust for biases in subjective reports. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/va8bx · DOI
  2. Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2011). An R Companion to Applied Regression, Third Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved from https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/
  3. Intille, S. S., Haynes, C., Maniar, D., Ponnada, A., & Manjourides, J. (2016). µEMA : Microinteraction-based Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) using a smartwatch. UbiComp '16, 1124-1135. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971717 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1983). The Experience Sampling Method. In H. T. Reis (Ed.), New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science (pp. 41-56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Shrout, P., & Lane, S. (2012). Psychometrics. In Mehl, M., & Conner, T. (Ed.). Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York, NY: Guilford.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eisele, G., Vachon, H., Lafit, G., Kuppens, P., Houben, M., Myin-Germeys, I., & Viechtbauer, W.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Eisele, Gudrun
Venue
Assessment
Published
2020-09-10
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
136-151
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
OpenAlex
W3085273257
Cited by
459
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 87 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
41.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Odysseus grant awarded to Inez Myin-Germeys (Grant)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
ecological momentary assessment, sampling frequency, questionnaire length, perceived burden, compliance, careless responding, data quality, student population, momentary experience
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Retrospective Studies, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review