Cited by 35Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Response-Time Variability Is Related to Parent Ratings of Inattention, Hyperactivity, and Executive Function

Open access
Gómez-Guerrero, Lorena, Martín, Cristina Domínguez, Mairena, María Angeles, Di Martino, Adriana, Wang, Jing, Mendelsohn, Alan L., Dreyer, Benard P., Isquith, Peter K. +3 more·2011·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Individuals with ADHD are often characterized as inconsistent across many contexts. ADHD is also associated with deficits in executive function. We examined the relationships between response time (RT) variability on five brief computer tasks to parents' ratings of ADHD-related features and executive function in a group of children with a broad range of ADHD symptoms from none to full diagnosis. METHODS: We tested 98 children (mean age 9.9 ± 1.4 years; 66 boys) from community clinics on short tasks of executive control (TEC) and the Eriksen Flanker task, while a parent completed the Conners' Parent Rating Scale and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function. RESULTS: Variability for two of the TEC tasks explained significant proportions of the variance of all five ADHD-related Conners' subscales and several executive function subscales. By contrast, variability on the flanker task or mean RTs for any task were not associated with any rating scale. CONCLUSION: The significant dimensional relationships observed between variability measures and parent ratings supported the utility of RT variability as an objective measure in ADHD and aspects of executive functioning that is superior to RT means or accuracy measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054709356379

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reaction time variability correlates with measures of behavioral inattention, and in a minority of studies also with hyperactivity-impulsivity.

    “Where relations between RTV and the ADHD symptom domains have been examined, RTV has correlated with measures of behavioral inattention [48,52,53] but has also been found to correlate with hyperactivityimpulsivity in a minority of studies”

    From Reaction Time Variability in ADHD: A Review (2012) · cites this paper as [54]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gómez-Guerrero, L., Martín, C. D., Mairena, M. A., Di Martino, A., Wang, J., Mendelsohn, A. L., Dreyer, B. P., Isquith, P. K., Gioia, G., Petkova, E., & Castellanos, F. X.
Affiliations
  • Servicio de Psiquiatría, Hospital Provincial de Pontevedra, Santiago de Compostela (La Coruña), Spain
  • Complejo Asistencial de Zamora, Zamora, Spain
  • New York University, New York, NY
  • New York University (US)
  • Dartmouth Medical School, Rockville, MD
  • Children’s National Medical Center, Rockville, MD
Corresponding author
Castellanos, F. Xavier
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2010-08-04
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
572-582
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2167734734
Cited by
35
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
  • RUNA. Repositorio Institucional del Sergas (Servicio Gallego de Salud (SERGAS)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • George Washington University
  • Dartmouth College
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH081218)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, reaction time variability, executive function, inattention, hyperactivity, parent ratings, Conners' Parent Rating Scale, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, flanker task, task switching, children
MeSH terms
Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Hyperkinesis, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Parents, Pilot Projects, Reaction Time, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review