Cited by 35Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Research Topics

Comorbid Internalizing and Externalizing Disorders Predict Lability of Negative Emotions Among Children With ADHD

Leaberry, Kirsten D., Rosen, Paul J., Fogleman, Nicholas D., Walerius, Danielle M., Slaughter, Kelly E.·2020·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

Objective: A subset of children with ADHD experience more frequent, sudden, and intense shifts toward negative emotions. The current study utilized ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to provide a valid assessment of the impact of comorbid internalizing and externalizing disorders on negative emotional lability (EL) among children with ADHD. Method: Parents of 58, 8- to 12-year-old children with ADHD were administered a diagnostic interview to assess for ADHD and for the presence of comorbid disorders. Parents completed EMA-based ratings of their child’s negative emotions three times daily for a total of 28 days. Results: Children with a comorbid internalizing disorder or children with comorbid oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) experienced significantly greater EMA-derived negative EL than children without comorbid disorders over time. Children with multiple comorbidities experienced greater EL than children with single comorbidities. Conclusion: Overall, this study suggested that both comorbid ODD and comorbid internalizing disorders contribute to negative EL among children with ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054717734647

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DBT extends CBT to emotional dysregulation, emphasizing mindfulness, distress tolerance, and interpersonal effectiveness.

    “Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) extends this approach to the domain of emotional dysregulation, emphasizing mindfulness, distress tolerance, and interpersonal effectiveness [161].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leaberry, K. D., Rosen, P. J., Fogleman, N. D., Walerius, D. M., & Slaughter, K. E.
Affiliations
University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
Leaberry, Kirsten D.
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2017-10-09
Volume
24
Issue
14
Pages
1989-2001
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2763981635
Cited by
35
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, comorbidities, internalizing disorders, externalizing disorders, oppositional defiant disorder, negative emotions, children, multiple comorbidities
MeSH terms
Affective Symptoms, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Emotions, Humans, Comorbidity, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review