Cited by 162Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBipolar Disorder and TreatmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Mood lability and psychopathology in youth

Open access
Stringaris, A., Goodman, R.·2009·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Mood lability is a concept widely used. However, data on its prevalence and morbid associations are scarce. We sought to establish the occurrence and importance of mood lability in a large community sample of children and adolescents by testing a priori hypotheses. Method: Cross-sectional data were taken from a national mental health survey including 5326 subjects aged 8–19 years in the UK. The outcomes were prevalence and characteristics of mood lability and its associations with psychopathology and overall impairment. Results: Mood lability occurred in more than 5% of the population of children and adolescents, both by parent and self-report. Mood lability was strongly associated with a wide range of psychopathology and was linked to significant impairment even in the absence of psychiatric disorders. Mood lability was particularly strongly associated with co-morbidity between internalizing and externalizing disorders, even when adjusting for the association with individual disorders. The pattern of results did not change after excluding youth with bipolar disorder or with episodes of elated mood. Conclusions: Clinically significant mood lability is relatively common in the community. Our findings indicate that mood lability is not a mere consequence of other psychopathology in that it is associated with significant impairment even in the absence of psychiatric diagnoses. Moreover, the pattern of association of mood lability with co-morbidity suggests that it could be a risk factor shared by both internalizing and externalizing disorders. Our data point to the need for greater awareness of mood lability and its implications for treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291708004662

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stringaris, A., & Goodman, R.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Stringaris, A.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2008-12-11
Volume
39
Issue
8
Pages
1237-1245
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2011853866
Cited by
162
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
emotional lability, children and adolescents, psychopathology, internalizing disorders, externalizing disorders, comorbidities, functional disability, prevalence, bipolar disorder, community mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Anger, Bipolar Disorder, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Female, Happiness, Health Surveys, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Personality Assessment, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review