Cited by 481Participatory Visual Research MethodsCommunity Health and DevelopmentYouth Development and Social Support

A Systematic Review of Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) in the United States: Methodologies, Youth Outcomes, and Future Directions

Anyon, Yolanda, Bender, Kimberly, Kennedy, Heather, Dechants, Jonah·2018·Health Education & Behavior

Abstract

Objectives. To use a systematic review methodology to describe the state of the youth participatory action research (YPAR) literature and synthesize findings about the youth outcomes reported in these studies. Methods. We screened and coded studies using a process consistent with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Of the 3,724 articles found in the database search, 67 reports of 63 distinct studies were included in the final sample. These reports were coded for reports of YPAR principles and project characteristics, study methods, and reported youth outcomes. Results. The YPAR literature comprises predominantly qualitative studies, with only two randomized trials. The most common outcomes associated with participation in YPAR were those related to agency and leadership (75.0%), followed by academic or career (55.8%), social (36.5%), interpersonal (34.6%), and cognitive (23.1%) outcomes. Conclusions. This systematic review provides emerging evidence of the skills and competencies youth may develop through YPAR and offers methodological recommendations for future research that can provide greater evidence of causality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1090198118769357

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anyon, Y., Bender, K., Kennedy, H., & Dechants, J.
Affiliations
University of Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Anyon, Yolanda
Venue
Health Education & Behavior
Published
2018-05-11
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
865-878
ISSN
  • 1090-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6127
OpenAlex
W2802602444
Cited by
481
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 1
FWCI
12.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Education & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver) (submittedVersion)
  • San José State University ScholarWorks (San Jose State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
Keywords
youth participatory action research, youth outcomes, youth agency, youth leadership, educational outcomes, career outcomes, social outcomes, interpersonal outcomes, cognitive outcomes, research methodology, youth competencies
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Leadership, Schools, Social Change, United States, Community-Based Participatory Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review